Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition

Overview of 112 dive sites. Figures are averages across the sites that report them (n = sites with a value); each site's own page has its individual values. Regional summaries: Egmont / Danger Island / Cauvin Bank, Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle, Victory Bank / Great Chagos Bank North, Salomon / Blenheim / Speakers Bank, Peros Banhos.

⬇ Download this overview as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics — Chagos Archipelago - Egmont (BIEG05)
Country
Chagos Archipelago
Sites
112
each linked below
Hard coral cover (overview mean)
39% ± 17% (std. dev.)
n = 109 of 112 sites. range 4.2–82%; Chagos Archipelago - Danger Island (BIDI16.5) (informal station, no transect) not counted
Water temp. during surveys (overview mean)
29.8°C
n = 108 of 112 sites; surveyed Mar 2015–May 2015; 107 of these are station CTD values, not dive readings
Coral Health Index (overview mean)
3.28 / 5
n = 8 of 112 sites; scale of zero to five, higher is healthier
Coral bleached (overview mean)
8.5%
n = 100 of 112 sites, published % bleached (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026); Chagos Archipelago - Danger Island (BIDI16.5) (informal station, no transect), Chagos Archipelago - Eagle Island (BIEA24.5) (informal station, no transect), Chagos Archipelago - Three Brothers lagoon (BITB34.5) (informal station, no transect) not counted
Most recent water temperature record
26 Oct 2026 · Chagos Archipelago, UK
Most recent heat stress record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
Mean annual max degree heating weeks (DHW), last 5 years
2021–2025 · Chagos Archipelago, UK
Highest annual heat stress
in 2016 · Chagos Archipelago, UK
Severe heat-stress years
1985–2025 · 2 in the last 10 years
Heat-stress figures: NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos Archipelago, UK 5-km virtual station. Each pill links its source record and carries the values behind it.

Heat stress

04812Week of 2023-04-02: DHW 0.5°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.96°CWeek of 2023-04-09: DHW 1.8°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.32°CWeek of 2023-04-16: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.08°CWeek of 2023-04-23: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.59°CWeek of 2023-04-30: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.37°CWeek of 2023-05-07: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.33°CWeek of 2023-05-14: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.10°CWeek of 2023-05-21: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.13°CWeek of 2023-05-28: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.06°CWeek of 2023-06-04: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.13°CWeek of 2023-06-11: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.85°CWeek of 2023-06-18: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.41°CWeek of 2023-06-25: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.37°CWeek of 2023-07-02: DHW 2.0°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.42°CWeek of 2023-07-09: DHW 0.6°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.67°CWeek of 2024-02-04: DHW 0.2°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.77°CWeek of 2024-02-11: DHW 0.5°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.85°CWeek of 2024-02-18: DHW 1.2°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.10°CWeek of 2024-02-25: DHW 2.0°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.03°CWeek of 2024-03-03: DHW 3.2°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.25°CWeek of 2024-03-10: DHW 4.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.15°CWeek of 2024-03-17: DHW 5.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.11°CWeek of 2024-03-24: DHW 6.6°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.43°CWeek of 2024-03-31: DHW 8.0°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.34°CWeek of 2024-04-07: DHW 9.1°C-weeks (Alert Level 2+: severe bleaching and significant mortality likely); SST 30.13°CWeek of 2024-04-14: DHW 10.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 2+: severe bleaching and significant mortality likely); SST 30.10°CWeek of 2024-04-21: DHW 10.4°C-weeks (Alert Level 2+: severe bleaching and significant mortality likely); SST 29.73°CWeek of 2024-04-28: DHW 10.4°C-weeks (Alert Level 2+: severe bleaching and significant mortality likely); SST 29.71°CWeek of 2024-05-05: DHW 10.5°C-weeks (Alert Level 2+: severe bleaching and significant mortality likely); SST 29.85°CWeek of 2024-05-12: DHW 10.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 2+: severe bleaching and significant mortality likely); SST 29.70°CWeek of 2024-05-19: DHW 9.3°C-weeks (Alert Level 2+: severe bleaching and significant mortality likely); SST 29.06°CWeek of 2024-05-26: DHW 8.6°C-weeks (Alert Level 2+: severe bleaching and significant mortality likely); SST 28.95°CWeek of 2024-06-02: DHW 7.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.18°CWeek of 2024-06-09: DHW 6.5°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.32°CWeek of 2024-06-16: DHW 5.4°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.11°CWeek of 2024-06-23: DHW 3.9°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.06°CWeek of 2024-06-30: DHW 2.5°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.38°CWeek of 2024-07-07: DHW 1.4°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.24°CWeek of 2024-07-14: DHW 0.3°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.18°CWeek of 2024-07-21: DHW 0.3°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.01°CWeek of 2024-07-28: DHW 0.2°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.70°CWeek of 2025-03-30: DHW 1.2°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.13°CWeek of 2025-04-06: DHW 2.3°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.15°CWeek of 2025-04-13: DHW 3.4°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.11°CWeek of 2025-04-20: DHW 4.6°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.20°CWeek of 2025-04-27: DHW 5.8°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.14°CWeek of 2025-05-04: DHW 6.1°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.93°CWeek of 2025-05-11: DHW 6.1°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.80°CWeek of 2025-05-18: DHW 6.9°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.11°CWeek of 2025-05-25: DHW 7.5°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.05°CWeek of 2025-06-01: DHW 7.5°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.58°CWeek of 2025-06-08: DHW 7.5°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.12°CWeek of 2025-06-15: DHW 7.5°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.01°CWeek of 2025-06-22: DHW 7.4°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 28.87°CWeek of 2025-06-29: DHW 6.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.07°CWeek of 2025-07-06: DHW 5.0°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 28.81°CWeek of 2025-07-13: DHW 3.9°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.71°CWeek of 2025-07-20: DHW 2.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.75°CWeek of 2025-07-27: DHW 1.6°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.57°CWeek of 2025-08-03: DHW 1.4°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.53°CWeek of 2025-08-10: DHW 1.3°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.61°CWeek of 2025-08-17: DHW 0.5°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.59°CWeek of 2026-03-15: DHW 0.5°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.87°CWeek of 2026-03-22: DHW 1.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.20°CWeek of 2026-03-29: DHW 2.2°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.93°CWeek of 2026-04-05: DHW 2.3°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 29.87°CWeek of 2026-04-12: DHW 3.4°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 30.15°CWeek of 2026-04-19: DHW 4.7°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.30°CWeek of 2026-04-26: DHW 6.1°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.40°CWeek of 2026-05-03: DHW 7.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 30.24°CWeek of 2026-05-10: DHW 7.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.65°CWeek of 2026-05-17: DHW 7.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.46°CWeek of 2026-05-24: DHW 7.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 29.59°CWeek of 2026-05-31: DHW 7.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 28.98°CWeek of 2026-06-07: DHW 7.2°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 28.98°CWeek of 2026-06-14: DHW 6.6°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 28.91°CWeek of 2026-06-21: DHW 5.4°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 28.96°CWeek of 2026-06-28: DHW 5.1°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 28.94°CWeek of 2026-07-05: DHW 4.8°C-weeks (Alert Level 1: significant bleaching likely); SST 28.93°CWeek of 2026-07-12: DHW 3.7°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.74°CWeek of 2026-07-19: DHW 2.4°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.48°CWeek of 2026-07-26: DHW 0.9°C-weeks (below the bleaching alert threshold); SST 28.52°C272829303132Bleaching threshold 30.0°C2023202420252026SST (°C)DHW (°C-weeks)
sea surface temperature (SST) (left axis)DHW under 2DHW 2–3DHW 3–5DHW 5–8DHW 8–10DHW over 10 (🔥 above 12)
Daily SST (line) and weekly maximum Degree Heating Weeks (bars), Jan 2023–Oct 2026, NOAA Coral Reef Watch 5-km Chagos Archipelago, UK virtual station. Dashed line: bleaching threshold (maximum monthly mean 29.0°C + 1°C). DHW ≥ 4: bleaching likely; ≥ 8: severe bleaching and mortality likely. A bar is drawn only where DHW exceeds zero, so a stretch with no bar is accumulated heat stress of zero, not missing data — the SST line runs the full period.

Long-term record: 3 years from 1985 through 2025 reached 8 or more °C-weeks at NOAA’s Chagos Archipelago, UK station. Download the annual DHW data (CSV).

112 sites in this region — click a marker to open that site.

Overview

Between 9 March and 3 May 2015, the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition surveyed 112 stations across the Chagos Archipelago: Egmont atoll, Danger Island, and Cauvin Bank; the western Great Chagos Bank, including the Three Brothers and Eagle Island; the northern Great Chagos Bank and Victory Bank; Salomon, Blenheim Reef, and Speakers Bank; and Peros Banhos. The Great Chagos Bank is a mostly submerged atoll of about 13,000 km², the largest atoll structure in the world (Spalding et al. 2001). The archipelago formed over the trace of the Réunion hotspot at the southern end of the Chagos–Laccadive Ridge, about 500 km from the Maldives. It holds some 220 scleractinian species, including Ctenella chagius, which may be found nowhere else, and its remote, largely uninhabited atolls lie inside the British Indian Ocean Territory marine protected area. Before 1998, coral typically covered 50–80% of seaward and lagoon slopes, and that year's bleaching is estimated to have removed 80–85% of it on seaward reefs.

The survey ran in two legs. From 9 to 28 March the team worked Egmont, Danger Island, Cauvin Bank, and the western Great Chagos Bank (59 stations). From 14 April to 3 May it worked the northern atolls and banks: Peros Banhos (20 stations), the Nelson Island lagoon and Victory Bank (8), and Salomon, Blenheim, and Speakers Bank (25). Most stations are sheltered lagoon, bank, and channel reefs, with forereefs on the outer rims of the atolls and off the Brothers. Logged maximum depths ran from 4.8 m at BIDI16.5 on Danger Island to 31.2 m at BIPB75 on Peros Banhos and BIVB99 on Victory Bank.

Hard coral cover averaged 39% across the 109 stations with a value, and 26 held 50% or more. Peros Banhos averaged 49% (n = 20) and Salomon, Blenheim, and Speakers Bank 46% (n = 25), with Speakers Bank alone at 52% (n = 7). Victory Bank and the northern Great Chagos Bank averaged 41% (n = 8), Egmont, Danger Island, and Cauvin Bank 37% (n = 8), and the western Great Chagos Bank 32% (n = 48). BIDI12, a seagrass meadow off Danger Island, had 4.2%, and Cauvin Bank (BICA01) had 4.6%. Recorded values included 82% at BISP96 on Speakers Bank, 77% at BIPB72, 71% at BISA98 (a single transect), and 67% at BITB58 on the Three Brothers. Most reefs are Acropora-led, with tiered tables and staghorn in the lagoons, while Porites leads on some forereefs, blue coral (Heliopora) dominates BIVB99, and algal cover ranged from 12% at BISP96 to 70% at BICC51.

The expedition coincided with the onset of the 2015 bleaching. A Coral Health Index was scored at only eight stations (mean 3.28/5). Published bleaching values averaged 8.5% across the 100 formal survey stations that have one (Mayfield and Dempsey 2026, S1), rising from 6.6% on the March leg (n = 52) to 10.6% in April and May (n = 48). By region, the western Great Chagos Bank averaged 6.7% (n = 45) and Egmont, Danger Island, and Cauvin Bank 6.2% (n = 7), against 10.7% at Peros Banhos (n = 19), 11.0% at Salomon, Blenheim, and Speakers Bank (n = 22), and 9.1% at Victory Bank and the northern Great Chagos Bank (n = 7). The three informal '.5' stations, surveyed from photographs only rather than transects, are reported separately: BIDI16.5 19.7%, BIEA24.5 27.8%, and BITB34.5 17.1%. Published values of 30% or more were recorded at BIPB112 on Peros Banhos (38%) and at BISA84 (34%) and BISA104 (31%) on forereefs outside Salomon atoll (leeward and side-on, respectively, by their GPS positions), and on the early-May repeat dives at BIPB72, BIPB69, and BIPB70 (37%, 36.5%, and 33%). Repeat dives at Peros Banhos tracked the event directly: BIPB69 rose from 0% on 16 April to 36.5% on 2 May, and BIPB72 from 10% to 37% in 13 days, with tabular Acropora worst affected. Several published values do not match the photographs, in both directions. Crown-of-thorns starfish were rare except for an active outbreak at BINI80, with at least eleven starfish in five frames; single animals were photographed at BIEG02, BIEA52, and BITB55. A clean white lesion of unresolved cause was photographed on one brain coral at BIDI10.

Two things stand out: the number of coral genera recorded and a reef system caught mid-bleaching. BIBL87 on Blenheim carries 37 coral genera, and the endemic Ctenella was recorded on the transects at 39 of the 109 stations, on Danger Island, Eagle Island, the Three Brothers, Central Chagos, Nelson Island, Peros Banhos, Victory Bank, Salomon, and Speakers Bank. An abandoned fishing net was photographed draped over live coral at BISA107, inside the no-take protected area. Sharks were seen throughout, including silvertip, gray reef, whitetip reef, and nurse sharks. Anderson saw and filmed a whale shark at BIPB112, and manta rays were recorded at BIPB66 and BIPB61; hawksbill turtles and spotted eagle rays were also seen.

Highlights

Notable observations (14)

Coral cover over time (pooled)

One point per year: the mean of every hard coral cover value available for this region that year — Anderson’s own dives and every independent survey station within 5 km of them. The vertical bar is the full range behind that mean. Different programs use different methods at different stations, so this is a regional summary, not a single comparable series. Records listed only for Three Brothers lagoon (BITB34.5) are also left out, because that pin is outside the regional mean. Years resting on fewer than three values are drawn as smaller points (2010, 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020). Non-CRD/LOF points are from XL Catlin Seaview Survey (University of Queensland), Sheppard et al. (2008), and Lange et al. (2021). Marker shape: Anderson’s own dives, other organizations’ surveys, a mix of both, that year, the year includes Global Reef Expedition dives made with the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation (CRD+LOF data).
0%22%44%66%88%2006201320202006: mean 35% of 6 values (range 19–48%)2010: mean 53% of 2 values (range 43–63%)2015: mean 36% of 138 values (range 3.4–82%)2015: includes Anderson’s dives on the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition2016: mean 9.9% of 1 value2018: mean 6.8% of 1 value2019: mean 19% of 2 values (range 14–23%)2020: mean 16% of 2 values (range 12–21%)
Sites in this region (112)

* Based on only 10–19 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

% coral cover by method

Pooled across 101 dive sites

MethodMean % coral coverStd. dev. between dive sitesn dive sitesNote
Manual point count (author)37%±10186 of these 18 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
CoralNet automated point classifier33%±117240 of these 72 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos33%±7.68743 of these 87 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
Claude (Anthropic), blind point count27%±108743 of these 87 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
In-house DINOv3 point classifier30%±108743 of these 87 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
In-water diver transect (line/point intercept)39%±16101—

The mean is an UNWEIGHTED mean of the dive site values — each dive site counts once, whatever its photo count — which is the convention of the published tables and of every other figure on this page. Each value is the one printed on that dive site's own page; a page that prints no value for a method (fewer than 10 photographs) is left out of that method's mean.

Closest to the reference

Over the dive sites where an independent reference exists, Manual point count (author) sits closest to it — a mean absolute deviation of 16.3 pp across 4 dive sites, then CoralNet automated point classifier 20.5 pp (n=4), Claude (Anthropic), blind point count 23.3 pp (n=4). Not in this ranking: Coralscapes v1, Coralscapes v2, and CoralSCOP (edited), which measure coral area rather than points; DINOv3, which counts points over a different denominator. A mean absolute deviation is not an accuracy score: a model with a consistent offset is correctable, while one with the same deviation scattered in both directions is not.

By dive site

Dive siteManual point countCoralNetCoralSCOP (edited)ClaudeDINOv3Diver transectCoralscapes v1Coralscapes v2
BIBL82too few photos
n=4
28%*
n=18
36%
n=22
28%
n=22
26%
n=22
42%42%
n=22
50%
n=22
BIBL83too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=6
41%*
n=15
24%*
n=15
25%*
n=15
33%42%*
n=15
45%*
n=15
BIBL86—32%
n=27
25%
n=27
34%
n=27
36%
n=27
43%51%
n=27
49%
n=27
BIBL87—28%
n=35
29%
n=35
30%
n=35
34%
n=35
43%42%
n=35
48%
n=35
BICC35—17%*
n=15
20%*
n=15
6.7%*
n=15
13%*
n=15
14%21%*
n=15
24%*
n=15
BICC36—19%*
n=15
25%*
n=15
6.4%*
n=15
18%*
n=15
8.6%21%*
n=15
27%*
n=15
BICC50—29%*
n=11
29%*
n=11
16%*
n=11
30%*
n=11
15%37%*
n=11
48%*
n=11
BICC51—22%*
n=17
28%*
n=17
21%*
n=17
24%*
n=17
17%27%*
n=17
28%*
n=17
BIDI08—36%
n=35
39%
n=35
35%
n=35
29%
n=35
61%50%
n=35
53%
n=35
BIDI09—38%
n=30
32%
n=30
34%
n=30
24%
n=30
38%56%
n=30
61%
n=30
BIDI10—27%*
n=13
33%*
n=13
23%*
n=13
16%*
n=13
23%44%*
n=13
49%*
n=13
BIDI12—10%*
n=14
18%*
n=14
2.9%*
n=14
11%*
n=14
4.2%8.2%*
n=14
10%*
n=14
BIDI13—20%*
n=11
25%*
n=11
18%*
n=11
18%*
n=11
7.2%22%*
n=11
24%*
n=11
BIDI14—too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
17%too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
BIDI15—too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
20%too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
BIDI16—26%*
n=13
31%*
n=13
24%*
n=13
22%*
n=13
27%32%*
n=13
36%*
n=13
BIEA18—22%
n=35
28%
n=35
18%
n=35
15%
n=35
21%33%
n=35
32%
n=34
BIEA19—27%*
n=14
39%*
n=14
31%*
n=14
25%*
n=14
28%42%*
n=14
45%*
n=14
BIEA20—25%*
n=19
27%*
n=19
22%*
n=19
16%*
n=19
13%31%*
n=19
35%*
n=19
BIEA22—49%
n=23
50%
n=23
31%
n=23
45%
n=23
27%44%
n=23
46%
n=23
BIEA23—36%
n=24
40%
n=24
29%
n=24
29%
n=24
26%44%
n=24
49%
n=24
BIEA24—41%*
n=11
39%*
n=11
37%*
n=11
41%*
n=11
16%49%*
n=11
49%*
n=11
BIEA25—29%*
n=19
30%*
n=19
16%*
n=19
26%*
n=19
18%31%*
n=19
33%*
n=19
BIEA26—21%
n=30
27%
n=30
15%
n=30
14%
n=30
24%23%
n=30
28%
n=30
BIEA52—38%
n=22
39%
n=22
35%
n=22
22%
n=22
37%50%
n=22
50%
n=22
BIEG0225%
n=21
—24%
n=21
18%
n=21
24%
n=21
37%31%
n=21
35%
n=21
BIEG0324%
n=36
—26%
n=36
17%
n=36
18%
n=36
40%32%
n=36
34%
n=36
BIEG0434%*
n=19
—28%*
n=19
26%*
n=19
35%*
n=19
33%36%*
n=19
39%*
n=19
BIEG0541%
n=35
58%
n=24
41%
n=59
39%
n=59
40%
n=59
44%61%
n=59
64%
n=59
BIEG06—44%
n=30
23%
n=30
32%
n=30
34%
n=30
49%46%
n=30
46%
n=30
BIEG07too few photos
n=8
—too few photos
n=8
too few photos
n=8
too few photos
n=8
48%too few photos
n=8
too few photos
n=8
BINI77—30%*
n=11
34%*
n=11
26%*
n=11
26%*
n=11
42%38%*
n=11
41%*
n=11
BINI78—24%*
n=16
28%*
n=16
25%*
n=16
29%*
n=16
22%27%*
n=16
29%*
n=16
BINI79—19%*
n=15
21%*
n=15
18%*
n=15
22%*
n=15
34%27%*
n=15
25%*
n=15
BINI8038%*
n=10
27%*
n=14
35%
n=24
29%
n=24
37%
n=24
49%42%
n=24
46%
n=24
BIPB110—37%
n=45
37%
n=44
29%
n=45
37%
n=45
42%44%
n=43
50%
n=43
BIPB11244%*
n=14
—38%*
n=14
29%*
n=14
44%*
n=14
46%51%*
n=14
55%*
n=14
BIPB11429%
n=22
too few photos
n=7
35%
n=29
20%
n=29
32%
n=29
43%37%
n=29
38%
n=29
BIPB6039%
n=38
—42%
n=38
30%
n=38
33%
n=38
42%55%
n=38
57%
n=38
BIPB6118%*
n=14
—32%*
n=14
17%*
n=14
22%*
n=14
20%41%*
n=14
43%*
n=14
BIPB6248%*
n=19
—32%*
n=19
34%*
n=19
35%*
n=19
59%58%*
n=18
58%*
n=18
BIPB6347%
n=29
—38%
n=29
35%
n=29
33%
n=29
56%66%
n=29
67%
n=29
BIPB6423%
n=21
—33%
n=21
23%
n=21
26%
n=21
33%34%
n=21
41%
n=21
BIPB6533%*
n=19
—28%*
n=19
30%*
n=19
32%*
n=19
47%52%*
n=19
55%*
n=19
BIPB66too few photos
n=6
—too few photos
n=6
too few photos
n=6
too few photos
n=6
7.8%too few photos
n=6
too few photos
n=6
BIPB6736%
n=41
—29%
n=41
26%
n=41
34%
n=41
46%49%
n=41
52%
n=41
BIPB6845%
n=43
—39%
n=43
37%
n=43
39%
n=43
59%72%
n=43
74%
n=43
BIPB6954%
n=110
too few photos
n=6
43%
n=116
39%
n=116
47%
n=116
73%74%
n=116
75%
n=116
BIPB7045%
n=28
45%
n=27
36%
n=55
35%
n=55
40%
n=55
70%57%
n=55
59%
n=55
BIPB7251%
n=41
56%
n=34
40%
n=75
44%
n=75
49%
n=75
77%64%
n=75
69%
n=75
BIPB73—45%
n=45
47%
n=45
38%
n=45
45%
n=45
50%48%
n=45
51%
n=45
BIPB74too few photos
n=8
56%*
n=13
47%
n=21
51%
n=21
49%
n=21
63%64%
n=21
66%
n=21
BIPB75—too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
46%too few photos
n=9
too few photos
n=9
BIPB76—30%
n=20
29%
n=20
21%
n=20
32%
n=20
40%35%
n=20
40%
n=20
BISA102—31%
n=27
34%
n=27
22%
n=27
30%
n=27
32%33%
n=27
35%
n=27
BISA103—28%*
n=19
36%*
n=19
30%*
n=19
37%*
n=19
33%41%*
n=19
44%*
n=19
BISA104—44%*
n=16
41%*
n=16
36%*
n=16
46%*
n=16
36%46%*
n=16
51%*
n=16
BISA105—24%*
n=19
23%*
n=19
28%*
n=19
36%*
n=19
52%42%*
n=19
47%*
n=19
BISA107—18%*
n=12
22%*
n=12
18%*
n=12
21%*
n=12
25%32%*
n=12
41%*
n=12
BISA84too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=7
too few photos
n=7
too few photos
n=7
49%too few photos
n=7
too few photos
n=7
BISA88—46%*
n=13
43%*
n=13
43%*
n=13
54%*
n=13
60%55%*
n=13
60%*
n=13
BISA91—47%*
n=13
44%*
n=13
40%*
n=13
56%*
n=13
57%58%*
n=13
65%*
n=13
BISA92—29%
n=39
29%
n=39
19%
n=39
26%
n=39
26%33%
n=39
34%
n=39
BISA93—39%
n=27
26%
n=28
33%
n=27
26%
n=28
41%58%
n=26
61%
n=27
BISA94—too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=2
52%too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=2
BISA97—51%*
n=12
29%*
n=12
51%*
n=12
50%*
n=12
55%68%*
n=12
69%*
n=12
BISP100—too few photos
n=7
too few photos
n=7
too few photos
n=7
too few photos
n=7
41%too few photos
n=7
too few photos
n=7
BISP101—39%*
n=13
33%*
n=13
23%*
n=13
32%*
n=13
52%42%*
n=13
44%*
n=13
BISP89—17%*
n=13
28%*
n=13
20%*
n=13
22%*
n=13
34%29%*
n=13
30%*
n=13
BISP90—too few photos
n=8
too few photos
n=8
too few photos
n=8
too few photos
n=8
44%too few photos
n=8
too few photos
n=8
BISP95—22%
n=26
23%
n=25
18%
n=26
20%
n=26
61%28%
n=26
28%
n=26
BISP96—56%*
n=18
48%*
n=18
51%*
n=18
49%*
n=18
82%69%*
n=18
73%*
n=18
BITB27—34%*
n=16
38%*
n=16
24%*
n=16
24%*
n=16
36%46%*
n=16
48%*
n=16
BITB28—27%
n=43
29%
n=43
18%
n=43
20%
n=43
31%34%
n=43
37%
n=43
BITB29—30%
n=49
26%
n=49
19%
n=49
24%
n=49
30%40%
n=49
42%
n=49
BITB30—30%*
n=12
30%*
n=12
14%*
n=12
18%*
n=12
43%34%*
n=12
38%*
n=12
BITB32—17%*
n=19
20%*
n=19
12%*
n=19
12%*
n=19
30%18%*
n=19
20%*
n=19
BITB33—20%
n=27
22%
n=27
7.9%
n=27
11%
n=27
21%18%
n=26
18%
n=26
BITB34—41%*
n=11
47%*
n=11
37%*
n=11
35%*
n=11
62%56%*
n=11
67%*
n=10
BITB37—37%
n=56
42%
n=57
29%
n=56
30%
n=57
40%51%
n=55
54%
n=55
BITB38—34%
n=44
31%
n=44
26%
n=44
28%
n=44
58%54%
n=44
56%
n=44
BITB39—40%
n=60
44%
n=61
37%
n=60
32%
n=61
52%53%
n=59
57%
n=59
BITB40—too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
45%too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
BITB41—32%*
n=13
40%*
n=13
25%*
n=13
32%*
n=13
43%40%*
n=13
42%*
n=13
BITB42—31%
n=49
35%
n=51
23%
n=49
24%
n=51
40%40%
n=50
43%
n=51
BITB43—36%*
n=12
37%*
n=12
22%*
n=12
15%*
n=12
30%47%*
n=12
50%*
n=12
BITB44—33%
n=36
39%
n=36
27%
n=36
29%
n=36
39%44%
n=36
47%
n=36
BITB45—45%*
n=13
36%*
n=13
33%*
n=13
39%*
n=13
45%51%*
n=13
52%*
n=13
BITB46—28%*
n=11
31%*
n=11
18%*
n=11
15%*
n=11
32%35%*
n=10
38%*
n=10
BITB47—too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=2
53%too few photos
n=2
too few photos
n=2
BITB53—35%
n=22
27%
n=22
23%
n=22
31%
n=22
33%41%
n=22
42%
n=22
BITB54—34%
n=99
31%
n=99
30%
n=99
21%
n=99
56%50%
n=97
54%
n=97
BITB55—43%*
n=14
38%*
n=14
33%*
n=14
34%*
n=14
51%47%*
n=14
51%*
n=14
BITB56—20%*
n=13
18%*
n=13
19%*
n=13
20%*
n=13
25%25%*
n=13
26%*
n=13
BITB57—44%
n=111
36%
n=111
43%
n=111
33%
n=111
43%66%
n=111
68%
n=111
BITB58—too few photos
n=1
too few photos
n=1
too few photos
n=1
too few photos
n=1
67%too few photos
n=1
too few photos
n=1
BIVB108too few photos
n=1
25%*
n=10
28%*
n=11
12%*
n=11
24%*
n=11
47%23%*
n=10
18%*
n=11
BIVB109too few photos
n=1
35%
n=32
25%
n=33
35%
n=33
39%
n=33
48%67%
n=33
66%
n=33
BIVB81—too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
43%too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
BIVB99—21%*
n=11
19%*
n=11
35%*
n=11
25%*
n=11
60%64%*
n=11
63%*
n=11
BICA01too few photos
n=1
—too few photos
n=1
too few photos
n=1
too few photos
n=1
4.6%too few photos
n=1
too few photos
n=1
BIDI16.5 (not in the regional mean)46%*
n=13
39%*
n=11
30%*
n=11
26%*
n=11
42%*
n=11
—37%*
n=11
39%*
n=11
BIEA24.5 (not in the regional mean)—too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
—too few photos
n=5
too few photos
n=5
BITB34.5 (not in the regional mean)—too few photos
n=3
too few photos
n=3
too few photos
n=3
too few photos
n=3
—too few photos
n=3
too few photos
n=3

n under each value is the number of photographs that method scored at that dive site. ⚠ marks a cell that is not an independent check. * marks a value resting on only 10–19 photographs, which is less certain.

Reference: IN-WATER DIVER TRANSECT, independent of the imagery (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans 7:1). Denominator: line/point intercept along the transect; not a photo-point denominator. Source: the mean of all of each station's transects (Living Oceans Foundation per-transect benthic data); the published station values, which weight each depth equally, are in Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans 7:1, suppl. S1 (formal 38.7% cover / 30.5% bleaching, tourist-diver 35.1% / 31.8%) ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea. Those are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is the mean of all of each station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data.

Nearby external survey stations

58 independent survey records within 5 km of a site in this region (each record counted once; 43 lines, and a line that pools several records says how many).

Show all 58 records

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, XL Catlin Seaview Survey (University of Queensland), Sheppard et al. (2008), and Lange et al. (2021).

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Spalding MD, Ravilious C, Green EP (2001). World Atlas of Coral Reefs. University of California Press, Berkeley. PDF
  3. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  4. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF