Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos (BIPB65)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-15
Coordinates
-5.4108, 71.8035
Coral cover
47%
± 4.0% SE, n = 18 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
8.3%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
35
Site summary

A leeward lagoonal patch reef (dived to 25.2 m), dominated by Acropora (about two-thirds of the coral) at 47% cover, with prominent coralline crust and bare rock. Most colonies in the photographs looked healthy, but several branching corals were white beside pigmented neighbors, the condition notes for the nine colonies Anderson sampled run from healthy to more than 90% bleached, and a shark that resembles a nurse shark rested on the sand near a moray eel. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
25.2 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.5°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 30.0–30.9°C
+1.5°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 30.0–30.9°C.
Bottom time
63 min
in at 14:12

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

3 of the 35 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

3467891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIPB65 is a leeward lagoonal patch reef in Peros Banhos (the nearest class on the LOF habitat map is lagoonal pinnacle reefs, massive coral dominated), surveyed 15 April 2015 on a dive to 25.2 m (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).

General benthic features

The coral community is overwhelmingly dominated by Acropora, which accounts for about two-thirds of all coral cover, with Porites a distant second and twenty-one other genera making up a thin remaining tail. Crustose coralline algae cover 11% of the benthos and bare substrate 17% (LOF transects).

Coral cover

Stressors

In the photographs most colonies appear healthy and normally pigmented, but several branching corals show clear colony-scale white pallor beside fully pigmented neighbors, and a shark that resembles a nurse shark resting on the sand (e.g., Image 5) and a moray eel were also observed on the reef.

Anderson's sampling sheet records nine colonies sampled here at 6.5–25.1 m: six Pocillopora acuta by RFLP; two Seriatopora hystrix by field call; one Pocillopora sp. sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to >90% bleached, with some partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, one independent station, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36007, 3.34 km away, read 29% in 2015.

Other notes

Reef type follows Anderson's field sheet; on the LOF habitat map the pin lies 34 m from 'lagoonal pinnacle reefs - massive coral dominated' (38 m from the branching-coral class) inside the lagoon; a lagoon pin has no rim facing. Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) records 'lagoonal patch reef', 'leeward'; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (patch reef).

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)47.3
In-house DINOv332.3*n = 19 · SE 4.1
CoralSCOP edited27.5*n = 19 · SE 3.0
Claude30.3*n = 19 · SE 5.6

The three computer-vision methods agree within 4.8 pp (27.5–32.3%) and read 15.0–19.8 pp below the in-water transect (47.3%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 19 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Spalding et al. (2025)—4 stations, 2.99–3.46 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20151 station, 3.34 kmRecords ↓

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (47%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km. 4 further rows in the table have no survey date, so they are listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36007201529%3.34 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Spalding et al. (2025)Peros Banhos - lagoon Knoll (N, 9-12 m)pre-bleaching baseline80% best patch3.46 km—
Spalding et al. (2025)Peros Banhos - lagoon Knoll (N, 6-9 m)pre-bleaching baseline70%3.46 km—
Spalding et al. (2025)Peros Banhos - Vache Marine, lagoon (W, 5-10 m)pre-bleaching baseline80% best patch2.99 km—
Spalding et al. (2025)Peros Banhos - Vache Marine, lagoon (W, 2-3 m)pre-bleaching baseline35%2.99 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF
  3. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI