Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos and Chagos Archipelago

A leeward lagoonal patch reef (dived to 25.2 m), dominated by Acropora (about two-thirds of the coral) at 47% cover, with prominent coralline crust and bare rock. Most colonies in the photographs looked healthy, but several branching corals were white beside pigmented neighbors, the condition notes for the nine colonies Anderson sampled run from healthy to more than 90% bleached, and a shark that resembles a nurse shark rested on the sand near a moray eel. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Peros Banhos, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
3 of the 35 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BIPB65 is a leeward lagoonal patch reef in Peros Banhos (the nearest class on the LOF habitat map is lagoonal pinnacle reefs, massive coral dominated), surveyed 15 April 2015 on a dive to 25.2 m (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).
The coral community is overwhelmingly dominated by Acropora, which accounts for about two-thirds of all coral cover, with Porites a distant second and twenty-one other genera making up a thin remaining tail. Crustose coralline algae cover 11% of the benthos and bare substrate 17% (LOF transects).
In the photographs most colonies appear healthy and normally pigmented, but several branching corals show clear colony-scale white pallor beside fully pigmented neighbors, and a shark that resembles a nurse shark resting on the sand (e.g., Image 5) and a moray eel were also observed on the reef.
Anderson's sampling sheet records nine colonies sampled here at 6.5–25.1 m: six Pocillopora acuta by RFLP; two Seriatopora hystrix by field call; one Pocillopora sp. sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to >90% bleached, with some partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, one independent station, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36007, 3.34 km away, read 29% in 2015.
Reef type follows Anderson's field sheet; on the LOF habitat map the pin lies 34 m from 'lagoonal pinnacle reefs - massive coral dominated' (38 m from the branching-coral class) inside the lagoon; a lagoon pin has no rim facing. Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) records 'lagoonal patch reef', 'leeward'; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (patch reef).
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 47.3 | |
| In-house DINOv3 | 32.3* | n = 19 · SE 4.1 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 27.5* | n = 19 · SE 3.0 |
| Claude | 30.3* | n = 19 · SE 5.6 |
The three computer-vision methods agree within 4.8 pp (27.5–32.3%) and read 15.0–19.8 pp below the in-water transect (47.3%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
*Based on only 19 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spalding et al. (2025) | — | 4 stations, 2.99–3.46 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015 | 1 station, 3.34 km | Records ↓ |
Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (47%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km. 4 further rows in the table have no survey date, so they are listed but not part of this summary.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36007 | 2015 | 29% | 3.34 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | Peros Banhos - lagoon Knoll (N, 9-12 m) | pre-bleaching baseline | 80% best patch | 3.46 km | — |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | Peros Banhos - lagoon Knoll (N, 6-9 m) | pre-bleaching baseline | 70% | 3.46 km | — |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | Peros Banhos - Vache Marine, lagoon (W, 5-10 m) | pre-bleaching baseline | 80% best patch | 2.99 km | — |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | Peros Banhos - Vache Marine, lagoon (W, 2-3 m) | pre-bleaching baseline | 35% | 2.99 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.