Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA88)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-23
Coordinates
-5.3393, 72.2361
Coral cover
57%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
12.0%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
19
Site summary

A shallow (15 m) sheltered lagoon patch reef inside Salomon, the warmest site in its group at 30.7°C, almost fully covered in coral (56.7%) with 32 genera, including unusually abundant Lobophyllia and free-living mushroom corals. Several sharply white colonies stand out amid the dense, high-relief mix (12% bleached). Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
20.5 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.7°C
+1.6°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
Bottom time
64 min
in at 15:07

Ten independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Eleven other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of these 19 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5678910111213141516171819

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISA88 is a shallow, protected lagoonal patch reef inside Salomon atoll, surveyed 23 April 2015 at 14.8 m and the warmest site in this group at 30.7°C.

General benthic features

Thirty-two genera were recorded, the 8th-highest genus richness in the archipelago, with Acropora, Montipora, Porites, and an unusually abundant Lobophyllia sharing the assemblage and free-living mushroom corals marking the sheltered setting. The four depth transects change leading genus at every station — Acropora, then Lobophyllia, then Porites where cover peaks at 65%, then Montipora holding 60% of the coral where cover falls away.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 57% coral cover against 34.8% algae — 13th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, on a reef almost fully occupied, with bare substrate at just 1.2% (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Image-based methods read this reef 24–30 points lower than the transects (CoralNet 32.6%, Coralscapes 26.4%); the three are not interchangeable and should not be averaged (see the full report).

Stressors

Published bleaching is 12.0%, and the photographs show several sharply white colonies amid dense, high-relief mixed architecture (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).

No crown-of-thorns or disease signs were identified in the 19 stills reviewed. The bleaching percentage is a computer vision figure — CoralNet annotation of the informal survey images, not a diver's field estimate — and human-vs-model agreement is weaker for bleaching (r = 0.40) than for coral cover (r = 0.72).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)56.7
CoralNet45.8
In-house DINOv354.1
CoralSCOP edited43.4
Claude42.7

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)2006–20201 station, 2.79 kmRecords ↓
MERMAID*20201 station, 3.23 kmRecords ↓
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 1.27 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report)20241 station, 3.58 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20156 stations, 2.15–4.83 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%200620152024Sheppard et al. (2008) 2006: 32%Lange et al. (2021) 2006: 39%Lange et al. (2021) 2010: 53%Lange et al. (2021) 2016: 9.9%Lange et al. (2021) 2018: 6.8%Lange et al. (2021) 2019: 19%Lange et al. (2021) 2020: 17%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 19%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 22%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 27%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 28%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 34%MERMAID* 2020: 30%Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report) 2024: 65%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2015: 57%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-0.08 pp per year, not separable from zero; 8 years)
Sheppard et al. (2008) Lange et al. (2021) XL Catlin Seaview Survey MERMAID* Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report) Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 10 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 26 records between 2006 and 2024. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 2.79 km away), went from 39% in 2006 to 17% in 2020. One survey since 2021 recorded 65%. This site's own estimate (57%) sits 8.3 points below the recent value (65%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)Salomon200632% (5 surveys)1.27 kmHeatCRD database
Lange et al. (2021)Salomon Atoll2006–20206.8–53% (10 surveys)2.79 kmHeatCRD database
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36013201528%2.15 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36018201522%2.26 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36015201528%2.56 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36014201534%3.96 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36017201522%4.25 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36016201519%4.83 km—
MERMAID*Salomon 219202030% (4 surveys)3.23 kmMERMAID
Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report)Salomon - Boddam Lagoon (N, 1-4 m)202465%3.58 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF
  4. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF