Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle and Chagos Archipelago

BICC35 is a low-cover reef (14%) whose 61% algal cover is mostly sediment-laden turf and erect algae. Porites (24% of the coral) and Acropora (23%) lead, with Pocillopora third (20%), and the photographs show two gray reef sharks, a sea turtle, and dense surgeonfish schools. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Central Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
3 of the 16 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BICC35 is a submerged lagoonal bank reef in Central Chagos, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 20 March 2015 on a dive to 30.5 m.
Most of the 61% algal cover is sediment-laden turf (31%) and erect algae (20%), with gray carbonate films over pavement (e.g., Image 3).
Across 18 genera, Porites holds 24% of the coral and Acropora 23%, with Pocillopora third at 20%.
Published bleaching is 9.0%, and the photographs neither confirm nor dismiss it: one colony shows textbook white branch tips over pigmented bases, another is stark white but may be recent death, so bleached individuals were present in March, yet 9% of coral is far more than the frames show Image 1.
The photographs show no disease lesion, predation, or crown-of-thorns. Anderson's sampling sheet logs both colonies sampled here as 5% pale or sickly (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.
The vertebrate fauna is the standout: two gray reef sharks, a hawksbill-type turtle, a massed acanthurid aggregation (e.g., Image 2).
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
Anderson sampled two pocilloporid colonies on this dive for a collaborator (species are field calls; the sampling sheet): Pocillopora sp. ChJo98 (collected 08:32 at 30.0 m; a large colony, 5% sickly or pale, healthy part sampled) and ChJo99 (08:43, 20.0 m; a large colony, likely P. verrucosa and very common at the site, 5% pale or sickly, pale part sampled). The dive notes record intense surge, no hard structure above 15 m, and sharks, lobsters, and turtles, and no P. damicornis, P. acuta, or Seriatopora at the site. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).
Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'lagoonal bank reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers the Great Chagos Bank) shows open water with no visible bottom at the pin, inside the Great Chagos Bank lagoon, so it cannot test the aspect; the sheet's lagoon position stands.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 13.5 | |
| CoralNet | 17.0* | n = 15 · SE 3.4 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 13.1* | n = 15 · SE 3.3 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 20.5* | n = 15 · SE 3.8 |
| Claude | 6.7* | n = 15 · SE 2.6 |
The four computer-vision methods disagree by 13.8 pp (6.7–20.5%) and read within 7.0 pp of the in-water transect (13.5%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
*Based on only 15 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.