Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle and Chagos Archipelago

BICC35 is a low-cover reef (13.8%) where the algae underfoot is mostly gray carbonate pavement rather than fleshy weed. Porites and Pocillopora outrank the usually dominant Acropora here, and the reef hosts two gray reef sharks, a hawksbill turtle, and dense surgeonfish schools. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Central Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
3 of these 15 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BICC35 is a submerged lagoonal bank reef in Central Chagos, forereef aspect under intermediate exposure at 29.3 m, surveyed 20 March 2015.
That gray carbonate film, not fleshy weed, is what 54% algal cover means here (e.g., Image 3).
Unusually for Chagos, Acropora does not lead: across 18 genera Porites holds 28% of the coral and Pocillopora 21%, Acropora third at 16%.
Formal transects recorded 13.8% coral against 53.9% algae — 100th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 16th for algae — but the composition of the ground is the story: coralline algae is almost absent at 3.78%, 106th of 109, while turf-plus-sediment takes 25.6%, erect algae 18.3%, and bare substrate 22.4%. The two depth strata carry near-identical cover, 13.3% and 14.2%, yet algae falls from 67.8% to 40.0% between them and the genus order inverts, Acropora leading the shallower and dropping to sixth in the deeper. Image methods read 4-5 points below the transects (CoralNet 9.1%, Coralscapes 9.5%). Coral cover: 14%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 53.9% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.
Published bleaching is 9.0%, 36th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column — and the photographs neither confirm nor dismiss it: one colony shows textbook white branch tips over pigmented bases, another is stark white but may be recent death, so bleached individuals were present in March, yet 9% of coral is far more than 19 frames show (e.g., Image 1).
No disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns.
The vertebrate fauna is the standout: two gray reef sharks, a hawksbill-type turtle, a massed acanthurid aggregation (e.g., Image 2).
No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 13.8 |
| CoralNet | 17.0 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 13.1 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 20.5 |
| Claude | 6.7 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.