Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BICC35)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-20
Coordinates
-6.1838, 71.6403
Coral cover
14%
± 1.5% SE, n = 13 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
9.0%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
19
16 shown on this page
Site summary

BICC35 is a low-cover reef (14%) whose 61% algal cover is mostly sediment-laden turf and erect algae. Porites (24% of the coral) and Acropora (23%) lead, with Pocillopora third (20%), and the photographs show two gray reef sharks, a sea turtle, and dense surgeonfish schools. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.5 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.5°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.3–29.7°C
+0.6°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.3–29.7°C.
Bottom time
54 min
in at 08:20

3 of the 16 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

45678910111213141516

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BICC35 is a submerged lagoonal bank reef in Central Chagos, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 20 March 2015 on a dive to 30.5 m.

General benthic features

Most of the 61% algal cover is sediment-laden turf (31%) and erect algae (20%), with gray carbonate films over pavement (e.g., Image 3).

Across 18 genera, Porites holds 24% of the coral and Acropora 23%, with Pocillopora third at 20%.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 9.0%, and the photographs neither confirm nor dismiss it: one colony shows textbook white branch tips over pigmented bases, another is stark white but may be recent death, so bleached individuals were present in March, yet 9% of coral is far more than the frames show Image 1.

The photographs show no disease lesion, predation, or crown-of-thorns. Anderson's sampling sheet logs both colonies sampled here as 5% pale or sickly (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

The vertebrate fauna is the standout: two gray reef sharks, a hawksbill-type turtle, a massed acanthurid aggregation (e.g., Image 2).

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson sampled two pocilloporid colonies on this dive for a collaborator (species are field calls; the sampling sheet): Pocillopora sp. ChJo98 (collected 08:32 at 30.0 m; a large colony, 5% sickly or pale, healthy part sampled) and ChJo99 (08:43, 20.0 m; a large colony, likely P. verrucosa and very common at the site, 5% pale or sickly, pale part sampled). The dive notes record intense surge, no hard structure above 15 m, and sharks, lobsters, and turtles, and no P. damicornis, P. acuta, or Seriatopora at the site. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'lagoonal bank reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers the Great Chagos Bank) shows open water with no visible bottom at the pin, inside the Great Chagos Bank lagoon, so it cannot test the aspect; the sheet's lagoon position stands.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)13.5
CoralNet17.0*n = 15 · SE 3.4
In-house DINOv313.1*n = 15 · SE 3.3
CoralSCOP edited20.5*n = 15 · SE 3.8
Claude6.7*n = 15 · SE 2.6

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 13.8 pp (6.7–20.5%) and read within 7.0 pp of the in-water transect (13.5%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 15 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.