Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BICC35)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-20
Coordinates
-6.1838, 71.6403
Coral cover
14%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
9.0%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
15
Site summary

BICC35 is a low-cover reef (13.8%) where the algae underfoot is mostly gray carbonate pavement rather than fleshy weed. Porites and Pocillopora outrank the usually dominant Acropora here, and the reef hosts two gray reef sharks, a hawksbill turtle, and dense surgeonfish schools. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.5 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.5°C
+0.6°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
Bottom time
54 min
in at 08:20

3 of these 15 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

456789101112131415

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BICC35 is a submerged lagoonal bank reef in Central Chagos, forereef aspect under intermediate exposure at 29.3 m, surveyed 20 March 2015.

General benthic features

That gray carbonate film, not fleshy weed, is what 54% algal cover means here (e.g., Image 3).

Unusually for Chagos, Acropora does not lead: across 18 genera Porites holds 28% of the coral and Pocillopora 21%, Acropora third at 16%.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 13.8% coral against 53.9% algae — 100th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 16th for algae — but the composition of the ground is the story: coralline algae is almost absent at 3.78%, 106th of 109, while turf-plus-sediment takes 25.6%, erect algae 18.3%, and bare substrate 22.4%. The two depth strata carry near-identical cover, 13.3% and 14.2%, yet algae falls from 67.8% to 40.0% between them and the genus order inverts, Acropora leading the shallower and dropping to sixth in the deeper. Image methods read 4-5 points below the transects (CoralNet 9.1%, Coralscapes 9.5%). Coral cover: 14%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 53.9% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.

Stressors

Published bleaching is 9.0%, 36th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column — and the photographs neither confirm nor dismiss it: one colony shows textbook white branch tips over pigmented bases, another is stark white but may be recent death, so bleached individuals were present in March, yet 9% of coral is far more than 19 frames show (e.g., Image 1).

No disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns.

Fish and other fauna

The vertebrate fauna is the standout: two gray reef sharks, a hawksbill-type turtle, a massed acanthurid aggregation (e.g., Image 2).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)13.8
CoralNet17.0
In-house DINOv313.1
CoralSCOP edited20.5
Claude6.7

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.