Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos (BIPB67)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-16
Coordinates
-5.2810, 71.7350
Coral cover
42%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
4.9%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
43
Site summary

A Peros Banhos fringing forereef at 29 m with 42% coral cover that shifts from Acropora-dominated shallows to Porites-dominated depths, with relatively little bleaching (4.9%). Dense mixed coral thickets alternate with low pavement and rubble, patrolled by a gray reef shark and a large grouper. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.7 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.1°C
+1.0°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
Bottom time
61 min
in at 10:19

Two other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

1 of these 43 photographs is shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

2345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIPB67 is an emergent fringing forereef on Peros Banhos, surveyed on 16 April 2015 at 29 m under intermediate wave exposure.

General benthic features

Porites and Acropora lead the assemblage at roughly 15% and 13% of the benthos, though the balance shifts strongly with depth, from an Acropora-dominated shallow zone to Porites-dominated deeper ground. The reef alternates between dense multi-genus coral thickets and stretches of low-cover pavement and rubble, with a gray reef shark and a large grouper among the fish recorded (e.g., Image 1).

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 42% coral cover against 37.5% algal cover, with 4.9% of coral colonies showing signs of bleaching, a comparatively low figure for the archipelago. The bleaching percentage is a computer vision figure — CoralNet annotation of the informal survey images, not a diver's field estimate — and human-vs-model agreement is weaker for bleaching (r = 0.40) than for coral cover (r = 0.72). Image-based methods read this reef 15–16 points lower than the transects (CoralNet 26.1%, Coralscapes 26.9%); the three are not interchangeable and should not be averaged (see the full report).

Stressors

No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)41.9
In-house DINOv333.8
CoralSCOP edited29.5
Claude26.1

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.