Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos (BIPB67)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-16
Coordinates
-5.2810, 71.7350
Coral cover
46%
± 3.1% SE, n = 19 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
4.9%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
44
43 shown on this page
Site summary

A leeward fore reef slope on the west rim of Peros Banhos (dived to 30.7 m) with 46% coral cover that shifts from Acropora-dominated shallows to Porites-dominated depths; published bleaching is 4.9%, and the photos show white massive colonies and storm-broken tables. Dense mixed coral thickets alternate with low pavement and rubble, patrolled by a gray reef shark and a large grouper. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.7 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.1°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 30.0–30.2°C
+1.0°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 30.0–30.2°C.
Bottom time
61 min
in at 10:19

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of the 43 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

23467891011121314161718192021222324252627282930313233343637383940414243

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIPB67 is a leeward fore reef slope on the west rim of Peros Banhos (from its position on the atoll's northwest side relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds), dived to 30.7 m on 16 April 2015 (station CTD-cast midpoint 30.1°C); Anderson's notes describe a beautiful, steep wall with mild current and impressive fish schools.

General benthic features

Acropora and Porites lead the assemblage at roughly 16% of the benthos each, though the balance shifts strongly with depth, from an Acropora-dominated shallow zone to Porites-dominated deeper ground. The reef alternates between dense multi-genus coral thickets and stretches of low-cover pavement and rubble, with a gray reef shark and a large grouper among the fish recorded (e.g., Image 1).

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 4.9% of coral (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). The photographs show white massive colonies among pigmented neighbors (e.g., Image 15, Image 35) and broken table plates lying flat on the rubble (e.g., Image 5), matching Anderson's note of storm damage at 10–12 m.

The sheet records some bleached branches on the only Seriatopora colony seen at the site (ChSe70) and 5% bleaching on a sampled pocilloporid (ChJo176) (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and 0.2% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's dive on 16 April 2015 entered the water at 10:19 and lasted 61 minutes, to a maximum depth of 30.7 m (the field sheet); the notes describe a beautiful, steep wall with high coral cover, impressive fish schools, and mild current, with some storm damage at 10–12 m beside areas of high acroporid cover. Anderson sampled the only Seriatopora hystrix colony seen at the site, ChSe70 (collected 10:30 at 26 m; an encrusting mat from 26 to 27 m with some bleached branches; the healthy section was sampled), and three pocilloporid colonies for a collaborator: ChJo174 (Pocillopora meandrina or P. eydouxi; 10:43, 15.2 m; odd blue marks, though likely healthy), ChJo175 (likely P. verrucosa; 10:57, 10.2 m; healthy, with a green fluorescent hue), and ChJo176 (Pocillopora sp.; 11:05, 11 m; 5% bleached, candelabrum morphology). The notes record no P. acuta or P. damicornis at the site. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Reef type follows the LOF habitat map: the pin lies 42 m from 'deep fore reef slope' on the atoll's northwest rim (fore reef slope). Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) records 'fringing reef', 'windward'; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (fringing reef). The rim here faces west to west-northwest: windward of the northwest monsoon (December–March), leeward of the April–November southeast trades; Anderson's sheet label is 'windward'. The aspect shown, 'leeward', comes from the station's GPS position relative to the prevailing wind: the pin lies on the northwest side of Peros Banhos, about 162° off the prevailing southeast trades.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)46.0
In-house DINOv333.8n = 41 · SE 3.2
CoralSCOP edited29.5n = 41 · SE 2.1
Claude26.1n = 41 · SE 3.3

The three computer-vision methods differ by 7.7 pp (26.1–33.8%) and read 12.2–19.9 pp below the in-water transect (46.0%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.