Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB39)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-21
Coordinates
-6.1715, 71.5349
Coral cover
52%
± 2.4% SE, n = 19 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
4.2%
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
61
50 shown on this page
Site summary

A forereef off South Brother in the Three Brothers group with 52% coral cover and 34 coral genera, including the endemic brain coral Ctenella. The shallows are a zone of massive Porites with Acropora dominating below, and fish are the standout: fusilier and baitfish schools, bluefin trevally, a moray, and a giant clam. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.2 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.6°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.2–29.9°C
+0.7°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.2–29.9°C.
Bottom time
62 min
in at 10:23

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Thirteen other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

This page shows 50 of the 61 photographs from this site, including every one the text cites.

12 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

13478121415161718202126272829303334353637394041424344454647484950515253

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB39 sits on the emergent fringing forereef off South Brother in the Three Brothers group, windward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 21 March 2015 on a dive to 30.2 m.

General benthic features

Genus richness is the other headline: 34 genera, including the Chagos-endemic brain coral Ctenella at trace level. Acropora leads at 22% of the benthos, 43% of all coral, ahead of Porites 6.3% (e.g., Image 2, Image 11).

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 4.2% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1), and the frames show partly bleached branching colonies: Image 10 holds a brown branching pocilloporid with several stark-white branch clusters whose polyps are still visible, and a second frame on file shows the same pattern.

The other colonies mostly hold normal pigmentation, and the conspicuous white areas elsewhere are exposed framework and rubble rather than pale tissue, though some pallor observations are left unresolved (e.g., Image 6, Image 24).

No crown-of-thorns, disease front, or predation scarring appears in the photographs from the 21 March dive. The expedition's BIOT-1 crown-of-thorns sheet lists 11 starfish (13 to 31 cm) under BITB39, with no date recorded. Anderson's sampling sheet records one of the six colonies sampled on 21 March, a Pocillopora acuta at 24 m, as 40% bleached, "possibly due to disease", and another as healthy though relatively pale. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Fish are the standout, with fusilier and baitfish schools, two bluefin trevally, a giant clam, and a moray (e.g., Image 5, Image 19, Image 22, Image 31, Image 38).

Comparisons with other data

Social Ecological Research Frontiers (SERF) and Thriving Oceans surveyed a nearby station (GCB South Brother Out E2) in 2010, 2019, and 2023, 0.22 km from the pin. Cover values from that work are not among the survey records shown on this page. Within 5 km, two independent stations recorded station-year means of 21–41% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2015; the nearest of these, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36004, 2.48 km away, read 21% in 2015.

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'fringing reef', 'windward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (fringing reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin off the western tip of South Brother, facing west (about 265°): windward for the northwest monsoon winds of the March survey and leeward for the southeast trades of April to November.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)52.2
CoralNet40.1n = 60 · SE 2.2
In-house DINOv331.7n = 61 · SE 1.8
CoralSCOP edited44.4n = 61 · SE 1.9
Claude36.7n = 60 · SE 2.5

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 12.7 pp (31.7–44.4%) and read 7.8–20.5 pp below the in-water transect (52.2%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 3.04 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. (2025)—1 station, 2.31 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20151 station, 2.48 kmRecords ↓

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 6 records between 2006 and 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (52%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km. One further row in the table has no survey date, so it is listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)Great Chagos Bank200641% (5 records)3.04 kmdoi:10.3354/meps07436
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36004201521%2.48 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Spalding et al. (2025)Great Chagos Bank - Middle Brother, lagoon (E aspect, 1-3 m)pre-bleaching baseline50%2.31 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF
  4. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI