Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB41)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-22
Coordinates
-6.0300, 71.5490
Coral cover
42%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
7.7%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
13
Site summary

A bank reef outside the Three Brothers lagoon dominated by Porites, with Acropora unusually scarce, over ground of bare rock and sponges rather than the usual coralline pavement. Cover is patchy (28-73% between transects), and some colonies show real but scattered paling. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.2 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.2°C
+0.3°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
Bottom time
50 min
in at 08:41

Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB41 is an intermediate-exposure submerged bank reef outside the lagoon at Three Brothers, surveyed 22 March 2015 at 28 m.

General benthic features

Across 28 genera, 29th of 109, the assemblage is overwhelmingly Porites-led at 17.96% of the benthos, 43% of every coral point and four times the next genus, while Acropora is an unusually minor sixth at 2.03% (e.g., Image 2, Image 5, Image 8, Image 15, Image 16).

One frame captures a coral-on-coral overgrowth margin (e.g., Image 3).

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 41.9% coral against 28.8% algae — 46th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 90th for algae, the lowest fifth of the archipelago — but this is not the usual hard coralline pavement: coralline algae is only 8.6% of the benthos and turf 6.6%, both near the archipelago's bottom, and the space is taken by 15.4% bare substrate and 13.9% non-coral invertebrates (e.g., Image 1, Image 4, Image 6, Image 11, Image 12).

The three depth strata are nearly identical in cover — 44.3%, 40.5%, 41.0% — yet individual transects range 28% to 73%, so patchiness is roughly five times the depth signal and no cover trend can be defended; composition does change, Acropora falling to zero at the deepest stratum while Pachyseris rises from absent to 7.00% and bare substrate climbs to 25.0%. Image methods read 12 to 17 points lower (CoralNet 25.4%, Coralscapes 29.5%) and should not be averaged with the transects. Coral cover: 42%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 28.8% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 41.9% · CoralNet points 25.4% · Coralscapes masks 29.5% (13 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.

Stressors

Bleaching is 7.65% on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, 45th of the 98 sites carrying a value, and the two CoralNet runs agree, so the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) figure is the same. All 13 frames were reviewed: paling is real but patchy, a stark-white branching colony partly overgrown by algae and white branch tips on an otherwise pigmented Pocillopora, but no site-wide field, no crown-of-thorns, and no disease (e.g., Image 9, Image 13).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)41.9
CoralNet31.8
In-house DINOv331.8
CoralSCOP edited39.5
Claude24.9

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.