Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Salomon / Blenheim / Speakers Bank and Chagos Archipelago

A high-cover patch reef in the Salomon lagoon near the north-west channel, leeward on Anderson's field sheet (55% coral), with 28 coral genera: Acropora leads in the shallows, while deeper down Porites, Goniopora, and Merulina share the reef. Compact branching colonies, massive heads, and table fields pack the bottom with little open sand. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Eight independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Twelve other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Salomon Atoll, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
7 of the 18 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BISA97 is a channel patch reef in the Salomon lagoon near the north-west pass, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 26 April 2015 on a dive to 15.5 m; the notes describe a murky lagoon site near the channel with high coral cover and diversity, a mix of back-reef and fore-reef corals, and calm water with no current.
Acropora leads at 19% of the benthos — 34% of all coral — but Porites at 11% and Goniopora at 6.4% are substantial, and the fleshy and massive component is well represented: Merulina 4.9%, Goniastrea 3.0%, Lobophyllia 2.5%, Favia 1.7%, Galaxea 0.9%, and Pavona 0.8%. Sixteen further genera fall below 0.5%, including Isopora, Ctenactis, Halomitra, Pachyseris, and Millepora. Bare substrate and coralline algae hold 10% of the benthos each, non-coral invertebrates 9.5%, turf 8.1%, and macroalgae 3.0%. The reef has strong local continuity. One frame shows numerous compact branching colonies packed across the substrate with little open sand; two others add large massive and lobate colonies; two more show tables and corymbose fields extending into the middle distance; and another shows the assemblage continuing across a broad shallow surface (e.g., Image 3, Image 5).
Crevices remain between colonies, but living coral occupies much of the visible hard bottom in most frames. The benthic palette includes pink and purple encrusting surfaces, brown foliose growth, small meandroid colonies, and smooth massive heads — the visible counterpart to a 9.5% non-coral invertebrate figure and a genus list this long (e.g., Image 2).
The photographs document a densely packed shallow coral garden with massive heads, tables, foliose forms, and heavy encrustation, plus convincing bleaching in both branching colonies and one large table.
Published bleaching is 8.8% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1), and Anderson's notes record very bad bleaching in P. verrucosa, with almost all colonies at the site badly bleached. One frame shows several compact and thick-branched colonies uniformly cream-white while adjacent colonies retain brown, purple, or green pigmentation (e.g., Image 13).
Another frame centers a very large table colony pale to white across nearly the entire plate (e.g., Image 9).
Other wide frames contain scattered white colonies, including pale tables and compact branches. Anderson's sampling sheet records 11 colonies sampled here at 10.5–15.4 m: five Pocillopora acuta and one P. damicornis by RFLP; two Seriatopora hystrix and one Seriatopora sp. by field call; one P. verrucosa and one Pocillopora sp. sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 100% bleached, with some partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). One very large massive colony is partly bleached: its broad upper lobes are cream-white with live tissue, beside tan lobes of the same colony (e.g., Image 15).
The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.3% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.
Fish use the coral relief heavily. Two frames show schools of small fishes concentrated around a large bommie with larger reef fishes above the structure, and a third shows another school in open blue water beyond the coral field (e.g., Image 1).
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, eight independent stations recorded station-year means of 6.8–63% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2020; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36013, 0.86 km away, read 28% in 2015.
Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'channel patch reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (channel reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Salomon atoll; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin inside the Salomon lagoon near the north-west pass, consistent with the sheet.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 55.4 | |
| CoralNet | 51.1* | n = 12 · SE 4.3 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 49.7* | n = 12 · SE 4.7 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 29.4* | n = 12 · SE 4.3 |
| Claude | 51.1* | n = 12 · SE 5.3 |
The four computer-vision methods disagree by 21.7 pp (29.4–51.1%) and read 4.3–26.0 pp below the in-water transect (55.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
*Based on only 12 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lange et al. (2021) | 2006–2020 | 2 stations, 1.95–4.47 km | Records ↓ |
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | 2006 | 1 station, 3.71 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015 | 5 stations, 0.86–4.78 km | Records ↓ |
LOF Global Reef ExpeditionYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)Within 5 km, 8 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 20 records between 2006 and 2020. Of the 2 stations surveyed in more than one year, 2 declined (by 17–27 points) between their first and latest surveys. Two stations share the longest span (2006–2020); one, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 1.95 km away), went from 48% in 2006 to 21% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (55%) sits within the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (6.8–63%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lange et al. (2021) | Salomon Atoll | 2006–2020 | 6.8–63% (range of yearly means; 5 records) | 1.95 km | doi:10.1007/s00338-021-02184-w |
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | Salomon | 2006 | 32% (5 records) | 3.71 km | doi:10.3354/meps07436 |
| Lange et al. (2021) | Salomon Atoll | 2006–2020 | 9.9–43% (range of yearly means; 5 records) | 4.47 km | doi:10.1007/s00338-021-02184-w |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36013 | 2015 | 28% | 0.86 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36014 | 2015 | 34% | 1.88 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36016 | 2015 | 19% | 2.57 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36018 | 2015 | 22% | 3.11 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36015 | 2015 | 28% | 4.78 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.