Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Blenheim (BIBL87)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-23
Coordinates
-5.2320, 72.4430
Coral cover
43%
± 4.0% SE, n = 16 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
9.6%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
35
Site summary

BIBL87 has 37 coral genera, with no single taxon dominating — Acropora leads at just 19%. Cover measured 43% with 9.6% of coral bleached in the published image analysis, and the reef alternates between open pavement and denser branching-and-table habitat. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
29.9 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.7°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.5–30.0°C
+0.6°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.5–30.0°C. Anderson's sampling-sheet note for the dive gives 30-31°C; the CTD cast is the station value shown.
Bottom time
54 min
in at 11:10

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

One other CRD dive site with its own page within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

25 of the 35 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

35911121624262837

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIBL87 is a submerged fore reef at Blenheim, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 23 April 2015 on a dive to 29.9 m.

General benthic features

It holds 37 coral genera and no dominant taxon — Acropora leads at just 19% of the coral present, with Porites, Pocillopora, Pavona, and Montipora close behind (e.g., Image 4, Image 6, Image 10, Image 18, Image 20, Image 21, Image 23, Image 25, Image 30, Image 31).

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 9.6%, and the photographs record pale-to-white table colonies at close range over a reef alternating between open crusted pavement and branching-and-table habitat (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 7, Image 13, Image 15, Image 19, Image 27, Image 29, Image 35).

No crown-of-thorns or disease signs were identified in the 35 stills reviewed. The bleaching percentage is a computer vision figure — CoralNet annotation of the informal survey images, not a diver's field estimate — and human-vs-model agreement is weaker for bleaching (r = 0.40) than for coral cover (r = 0.72). Anderson's sampling sheet records 10 colonies sampled here at 10.3–35.0 m: five Seriatopora hystrix and two S. aculeata by field call; two Pocillopora sp. and one P. verrucosa sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 100% bleached, with some partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and 0.3% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, one independent station, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36019, 3.05 km away, read 29% in 2015.

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'forereef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (fringing reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin on the western side of Blenheim Reef, facing west (about 275°): leeward for the southeast trades that set in during April, as on the sheet, though it would face into the northwest monsoon winds of December to March.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)42.7
CoralNet27.9n = 35 · SE 2.3
In-house DINOv334.0n = 35 · SE 2.1
CoralSCOP edited29.5n = 35 · SE 1.6
Claude30.3n = 35 · SE 2.2

The four computer-vision methods agree within 6.1 pp (27.9–34.0%) and read 8.7–14.8 pp below the in-water transect (42.7%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (43%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36019201529%3.05 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI