Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB56)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-27
Coordinates
-6.1857, 71.5661
Coral cover
21%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
16.0%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
13
Site summary

An algae-dominated bank reef inside the Three Brothers lagoon, with open pavement and rubble, 21.3% coral (mostly Porites), and nearly 49% algae. A spiny lobster sheltered under a ledge of plate corals, and despite a high published bleaching figure of 16%, the photos show no visibly bleached coral. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
25.7 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.8°C
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
Bottom time
45 min
in at 11:05

Ten other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB56 is a protected, submerged bank reef inside the Three Brothers lagoon, surveyed 27 March 2015.

General benthic features

Porites is by far the dominant coral genus, holding nearly half of all recorded coral, with Acropora, Montipora, Pocillopora, Favites, and Favia trailing well behind (e.g., Image 1, Image 3, Image 9, Image 11).

Coral cover and diversity peak at mid-depth and collapse at the deepest transect to a near two-genus assemblage of Porites and Acropora.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 21% live coral cover against a much higher 48.9% algal cover, making this an algae-dominated hardground of open pavement and rubble rather than a continuous coral wall (e.g., Image 4, Image 6, Image 12, Image 13, Image 16).

Image-based methods read this reef 6–7 points lower than the transects (CoralNet 15.6%, Coralscapes 14.5%); the three are not interchangeable and should not be averaged (see the full report).

Stressors

Despite a notably high published bleaching figure of 16.0%, the surveyed photographs show no visibly bleached coral, and the reef instead stood out for a sheltering spiny lobster found beneath a ledge of large plating corals (e.g., Image 2, Image 5, Image 8, Image 15).

The bleaching percentage is a computer vision figure — CoralNet annotation of the informal survey images, not a diver's field estimate — and human-vs-model agreement is weaker for bleaching (r = 0.40) than for coral cover (r = 0.72). No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)21.3
CoralNet19.9
In-house DINOv320.3
CoralSCOP edited18.0
Claude19.4

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.