Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB56)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-27
Coordinates
-6.1794, 71.5684
Coral cover
25%
± 3.0% SE, n = 13 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
16%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
13
Site summary

An algae-dominated submerged bank reef east of South Brother (leeward on Anderson's field sheet) with open pavement, rubble, 25% coral (led by Porites), and nearly 48% algae. A spiny lobster sheltered under a ledge of plate corals, and published bleaching was 16%. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
25.7 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.8°Cii
Station CTD reading
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
ii Station CTD value (LOF station records), not a dive reading: the CTD cast at this station recorded 29.8°C and no minimum (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records).
Bottom time
45 min
in at 11:05

Nine other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Site description

Setting

BITB56 is a submerged bank reef east of South Brother in the Three Brothers group, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 27 March 2015 on a dive to 25.7 m.

General benthic features

Porites is by far the dominant coral genus, holding nearly half of all recorded coral, with Acropora, Montipora, Pocillopora, Favites, and Favia trailing well behind (e.g., Image 1, Image 3, Image 9, Image 11).

Coral cover and diversity peak at mid-depth and collapse at the deepest transect to a near two-genus assemblage of Porites and Acropora.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching was 16% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images, not a diver's field estimate; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1); no bleached colony is visible in the 13 frames, and the three colonies Anderson sampled here were 5–10% pale, bleached, or sickly (see Dive record below). A spiny lobster sheltered beneath a ledge of large plating corals (e.g., Image 2, Image 5, Image 8, Image 15).

The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's morning dive on 27 March 2015 entered the water at 11:05 and lasted 45 minutes, to a maximum depth of 25.7 m (the field sheet); the notes describe an “unspectacular site” with a strong current and Halimeda-dominated ground at 15 m. Anderson sampled three pocilloporid colonies on this dive for a collaborator: ChJo150 (collected 11:09 at 21.3 m; Pocillopora sp., a large, flattened colony partly dead for months or years, 5% pale or sickly; the sickly part was sampled), ChJo151 (11:16, 25.1 m; P. verrucosa, large and healthy overall, some polyps extended; a pale branch, 5% of the colony, was sampled), and ChJo152 (11:29, 15 m; P. verrucosa, large, 10% bleached or sickly, common at the site, especially at 15 m; the healthy portion was sampled). The notes record no Pocillopora damicornis, P. acuta, or Seriatopora hystrix. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'submerged bank', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows open water at the pin about 2.5 km east of South Brother, at the eastern edge of the imaged area; no bottom or reef edge is visible, so the imagery cannot test the aspect.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)25.4
CoralNet19.9*n = 13 · SE 4.0
In-house DINOv320.3*n = 13 · SE 4.0
CoralSCOP edited18.0*n = 13 · SE 3.8
Claude19.4*n = 13 · SE 4.4

The four computer-vision methods agree within 2.3 pp (18.0–20.3%) and read 5.1–7.4 pp below the in-water transect (25.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 13 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.