Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP90)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-24
Coordinates
-4.9505, 72.4121
Coral cover
44%
± 3.3% SE, n = 16 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
2.1%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
8
Site summary

A submerged bank reef on the windward side of Speakers Bank (dived to 23.1 m), with 44% coral cover and 27 genera, including the Chagos-endemic brain coral Ctenella chagius. Acropora dominates the shallows, then gives way to Montipora and other corals deeper down, and published bleaching was 2.1%, though all four Seriatopora hystrix colonies Anderson sampled here were 95 to 100% bleached. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
23.1 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.6°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.5–29.8°C
+0.5°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.5–29.8°C.
Bottom time
54 min
in at 11:17

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

3 of the 8 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

35678

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISP90 is a submerged bank reef inside Speakers Bank, windward from its position on the southeast side of Speakers Bank relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds (leeward on Anderson's field sheet), the northernmost of the Chagos survey areas, surveyed 24 April 2015 on a dive to 23.1 m (e.g., Image 2, Image 4).

General benthic features

Across 27 genera, Acropora leads at 16% of the benthos, 35% of all coral, ahead of Porites 6.5% and Montipora 4.0%, and the Chagos-endemic brain coral Ctenella chagius is present at 0.4%. The depth finding is a clean handover: the shallower stratum carries 47% coral and is emphatically Acropora ground at 18% of the benthos, 38% of its coral, while the deeper falls to 32% and the ordering inverts entirely — Montipora takes the lead, Acropora collapses to 5.1%, and Goniastrea and Echinopora rise from near-absence.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 2.1% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). The photographs show at least five small stark-white fine-branching colonies among pigmented corymbose, plating, and massive colonies, separate from the cream-tipped corymbose colonies with pigmented bases (e.g., Image 1).

All four Seriatopora hystrix colonies Anderson sampled here were 95-100% bleached, and the notes describe the bleaching as pervasive, though not yet in every colony (see Dive record below). No crown-of-thorns, disease, or predation was seen in the eight frames. The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.5% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's late-morning dive on 24 April 2015 entered the water at 11:17 and lasted 54 minutes, to a maximum depth of 23.1 m (the field sheet); the notes describe a lagoonal back reef with a coral assemblage very similar to that of the earlier dive that morning (BISP89) but with higher recruitment, smooth glassy seas letting very high light reach depth, likely contributing to bleaching that was pervasive but not yet in 100% of the colonies, and Seriatopora hystrix very common at 20-30 m, nearly all of it dying or dead; there was no P. acuta. Anderson sampled four Seriatopora hystrix colonies: ChSe128 (collected 11:22 at 23.2 m; 100% bleached, possibly dead, live tissue not evident), ChSe129 (11:26, 20.9 m; more than 95% bleached, some pigment at the branch bases), ChSe130 (11:33, 19.6 m; 100% bleached with a neon-green fluorescent hue, live tissue not evident), and ChSe131 (11:39, 16.3 m; 100% bleached, rare above 15 m, no live tissue evident). For a collaborator Anderson also sampled four other pocilloporids (species by field call): Pocillopora verrucosa ChJo229 (11:43, 14.9 m; large, healthy, common at all depths), ChJo230 (11:46, 14.3 m; healthy, very dark pigmentation), and ChJo232 (11:52, 14.0 m; healthy, the shallowest coral on the reef), and Pocillopora eydouxi ChJo231 (11:50, 14.2 m; a strange-looking colony, healthy, the only one seen). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Anderson's field sheet records the aspect (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'submerged bank', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Speakers Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin on the lagoon side of the south-east rim of Speakers Bank, consistent with the sheet's 'leeward' and Anderson's note 'a lagoonal backreef'. The aspect shown, 'windward', comes from the station's GPS position on the southeast side of Speakers Bank relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds (about 11° off the upwind direction; the reef-edge reading agrees), which takes precedence over slope facing, lagoon shelter, imagery, and field labels.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)44.4
CoralNettoo few photos (n=8)
In-house DINOv3too few photos (n=8)
CoralSCOP editedtoo few photos (n=8)
Claudetoo few photos (n=8)

CoralNet: this method was run on 8 of 8 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

In-house DINOv3: this method was run on 8 of 8 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

CoralSCOP edited: this method was run on 8 of 8 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Claude: this method was run on 8 of 8 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.