Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA92)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation โ€” Global Reef Expedition
โฌ‡ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-25
Coordinates
-5.3289, 72.2800
Coral cover
26%
ยฑ 2.4% SE, n = 19 transects ยท Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
9.1%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021โ€“2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
40
Site summary

A windward fore-reef wall (dived to 30.2 m) that is grand to look at but held together more by sponges, sea squirts, meter-wide sea fans, and black wire corals than by coral (26% cover, though 31 genera). White massive colonies on the wall, pale-to-white branching colonies on the reef top, and two anemones with stark-white tentacles point to genuine heat stress. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.2 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.8ยฐCii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.8โ€“29.9ยฐC
+0.7ยฐC vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1ยฐC)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.8โ€“29.9ยฐC. Anderson's sampling-sheet note for the dive gives nearly 30ยฐC; the CTD cast is the station value shown.
Bottom time
67 min
in at 08:21

Three independent survey stations shown with the programโ€™s logo โ€” click one to see how far it is from this site.

Seven other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5ย km shown in orange โ€” click a marker to open its page.

6 of the 40 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

78910111214151617181921222324252627283031323334353637384041424344

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISA92 is a windward fore reef outside Salomon lagoon, surveyed 25 April 2015 on a dive to 30.2 m (e.g., Image 1, Image 3).

General benthic features

What holds the wall is not coral โ€” non-coral invertebrates take 27% of the benthos, more than the coral does, with coralline algae a further 20%, and the photographs show sponge- and ascidian-carpeted panels, meter-wide gorgonian sea fans, and black wire corals (e.g., Image 2, Image 4).

Porites leads at 8.3% of the benthos, 32% of all coral, with 24 genera under 1%.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 9.1% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). Several pale-to-white branching colonies sit among pigmented neighbors at the reef top (e.g., Image 5), encrusting and massive colonies stand stark white among pigmented ones on the wall, and two large sea anemones have stark white tentacles (e.g., Image 39) — genuine thermal stress, though anemones are not scleractinian and enter neither the cover nor the bleaching figures.

No crown-of-thorns or disease. Anderson's sampling sheet records eight colonies sampled here at 8.6–29.8 m: two Seriatopora hystrix by field call; five Pocillopora sp. and one P. verrucosa sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 100% bleached. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Perry et al. (2015) surveyed a nearby station (Ile Takamaka, Salomon) in March 2015, 0.47 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Cover values from that work are not among the survey records shown on this page. Within 5 km, three independent stations recorded station-year means of 9.9โ€“43% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2020; the nearest of these, Lange et al. (2021) at Salomon Atoll, 3.23 km away, read 9.9โ€“43% between 2006 and 2020.

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'fore reef', 'windward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'exposed' (fringing reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Salomon atoll; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin off the east-facing outer reef of the eastern island, windward of the southeast trades, consistent with the sheet.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. โš  The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. โš  SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ยฑ SE
Transect mean (all transects)25.9
CoralNet29.4n = 39 ยท SE 3.1
In-house DINOv325.6n = 39 ยท SE 3.9
CoralSCOP edited29.0n = 39 ยท SE 2.9
Claude18.8n = 39 ยท SE 3.3

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 10.6 pp (18.8โ€“29.4%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (25.9%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)2006โ€“20201 station, 3.23 kmRecords โ†“
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20152 stations, 4.01โ€“4.56 kmRecords โ†“
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%12%24%36%48%200620132020Lange et al. (2021) 2006: 29%Lange et al. (2021) 2010: 43%Lange et al. (2021) 2016: 9.9%Lange et al. (2021) 2019: 14%Lange et al. (2021) 2020: 12%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 19%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 34%LOF Global Reef Expedition 2015: 26%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)
Lange et al. (2021) XL Catlin Seaview Survey LOF Global Reef ExpeditionYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 7 records between 2006 and 2020. The one station surveyed in more than one year declined by 17 points between its first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 3.23 km away), went from 29% in 2006 to 12% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (26%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)Salomon Atoll2006โ€“20209.9โ€“43% (range of yearly means; 5 records)3.23 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-021-02184-w
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36014201534%4.01 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36016201519%4.56 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF
  3. Perry CT, Murphy GN, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Januchowski-Hartley FA, East HK (2015). Remote coral reefs can sustain high growth potential and may match future sea-level trends. Scientific Reports 5:18289. DOI
  4. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI