Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Salomon / Blenheim / Speakers Bank and Chagos Archipelago

A windward fore-reef wall (dived to 30.2 m) that is grand to look at but held together more by sponges, sea squirts, meter-wide sea fans, and black wire corals than by coral (26% cover, though 31 genera). White massive colonies on the wall, pale-to-white branching colonies on the reef top, and two anemones with stark-white tentacles point to genuine heat stress. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Three independent survey stations shown with the programโs logo โ click one to see how far it is from this site.
Seven other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5ย km shown in orange โ click a marker to open its page.
๐บ Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Salomon Atoll, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
6 of the 40 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BISA92 is a windward fore reef outside Salomon lagoon, surveyed 25 April 2015 on a dive to 30.2 m (e.g., Image 1, Image 3).
What holds the wall is not coral โ non-coral invertebrates take 27% of the benthos, more than the coral does, with coralline algae a further 20%, and the photographs show sponge- and ascidian-carpeted panels, meter-wide gorgonian sea fans, and black wire corals (e.g., Image 2, Image 4).
Porites leads at 8.3% of the benthos, 32% of all coral, with 24 genera under 1%.
Published bleaching is 9.1% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). Several pale-to-white branching colonies sit among pigmented neighbors at the reef top (e.g., Image 5), encrusting and massive colonies stand stark white among pigmented ones on the wall, and two large sea anemones have stark white tentacles (e.g., Image 39) — genuine thermal stress, though anemones are not scleractinian and enter neither the cover nor the bleaching figures.
No crown-of-thorns or disease. Anderson's sampling sheet records eight colonies sampled here at 8.6–29.8 m: two Seriatopora hystrix by field call; five Pocillopora sp. and one P. verrucosa sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 100% bleached. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.
Perry et al. (2015) surveyed a nearby station (Ile Takamaka, Salomon) in March 2015, 0.47 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Cover values from that work are not among the survey records shown on this page. Within 5 km, three independent stations recorded station-year means of 9.9โ43% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2020; the nearest of these, Lange et al. (2021) at Salomon Atoll, 3.23 km away, read 9.9โ43% between 2006 and 2020.
Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'fore reef', 'windward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'exposed' (fringing reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Salomon atoll; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin off the east-facing outer reef of the eastern island, windward of the southeast trades, consistent with the sheet.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ยฑ SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 25.9 | |
| CoralNet | 29.4 | n = 39 ยท SE 3.1 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 25.6 | n = 39 ยท SE 3.9 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 29.0 | n = 39 ยท SE 2.9 |
| Claude | 18.8 | n = 39 ยท SE 3.3 |
The four computer-vision methods disagree by 10.6 pp (18.8โ29.4%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (25.9%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lange et al. (2021) | 2006โ2020 | 1 station, 3.23 km | Records โ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015 | 2 stations, 4.01โ4.56 km | Records โ |
LOF Global Reef ExpeditionYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 7 records between 2006 and 2020. The one station surveyed in more than one year declined by 17 points between its first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 3.23 km away), went from 29% in 2006 to 12% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (26%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lange et al. (2021) | Salomon Atoll | 2006โ2020 | 9.9โ43% (range of yearly means; 5 records) | 3.23 km | doi:10.1007/s00338-021-02184-w |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36014 | 2015 | 34% | 4.01 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36016 | 2015 | 19% | 4.56 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.