Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB53)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-26
Coordinates
-6.1268, 71.5032
Coral cover
33%
± 3.6% SE, n = 13 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
3.2%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
22
Site summary

A fringing reef off North Brother (dived to 18.2 m), windward on Anderson's field sheet, where large gorgonian sea fans and massive coral bommies shelter dense fish schools, beside open rubble flats with scattered colonies. The reef is Porites-led at 33% cover, with a published bleaching rate of 3.2%. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
18.2 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.5°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.3–29.7°C
+0.6°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.3–29.7°C.
Bottom time
63 min
in at 08:25

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Nine other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

14 of the 22 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

7891215192226

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB53 is a fringing reef off North Brother in the Three Brothers group, windward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 26 March 2015 on a dive to 18.2 m.

General benthic features

Porites is the leading genus, carrying over a third of all coral recorded, followed by Acropora, though the balance shifts with depth: the shallow zone is algae-dominated with the two genera nearly tied, while the deepest stratum, a single transect, is more coral-abundant and clearly Porites-led. Underwater photographs show large gorgonian sea fans and massive coral bommies sheltering dense fish schools, alongside open rubble flats with only scattered colonies (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 3, Image 5, Image 6, Image 10, Image 14, Image 16, Image 18, Image 21, Image 24, Image 25).

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 3.2%. The bleaching percentage is a computer vision figure: CoralNet annotation of the informal survey images, not a diver's field estimate (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). Image 20 shows a small branching colony with its right half stark white, polyp texture still visible, and its left half brown: partial bleaching.

Two of the colonies Anderson sampled here were logged as 10% diseased or bleached (see Dive record below), and no crown-of-thorns is visible in the photographs. Small white bare patches between the branches of a pink-tan colony with extended polyps are recent mortality, cause not stated (e.g., Image 4).

The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, two independent stations recorded station-year means of 21–41% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2015; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36004, 3.76 km away, read 21% in 2015.

Dive record

Anderson's morning dive on 26 March 2015 entered the water at 08:25 and lasted 63 minutes, to a maximum depth of 18.2 m (the field sheet); the notes describe a calm dive on a very gradual slope from 13 to 18 m. The sampling sheet lists one Seriatopora hystrix colony, ChSe45 (about 09:00, logged at 28 m; collected by Andy and photographed only at the surface; appears healthy), and three pocilloporids sampled for a collaborator (Pocillopora sp.): ChJo142 (collected 08:36 at 15.1 m; a large, healthy colony between the candelabrum and P. eydouxi forms, common at the site), ChJo143 (08:41, 15.9 m; 10% diseased or bleached; the sickly part was sampled), and ChJo144 (09:10, 17.7 m; about 500 m from the other two, 10% diseased; the diseased part was sampled). The notes record no Pocillopora damicornis, P. acuta, or Seriatopora hystrix at the depths Anderson dived. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'fringing reef', 'windward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (fringing reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows open water at the pin about 1.1 km north of North Brother, where sun glint covers the water; no bottom or reef edge is visible, so the imagery cannot test the aspect.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)32.5
CoralNet35.2n = 22 · SE 4.7
In-house DINOv330.8n = 22 · SE 5.4
CoralSCOP edited27.4n = 22 · SE 4.3
Claude23.4n = 22 · SE 6.6

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 11.8 pp (23.4–35.2%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (32.5%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 3.76 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. (2025)—1 station, 3.79 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20151 station, 3.76 kmRecords ↓

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 6 records between 2006 and 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (33%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km. One further row in the table has no survey date, so it is listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)Great Chagos Bank200641% (5 records)3.76 kmdoi:10.3354/meps07436
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36004201521%3.76 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Spalding et al. (2025)Great Chagos Bank - Middle Brother, lagoon (E aspect, 1-3 m)pre-bleaching baseline50%3.79 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF
  4. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI