Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB55)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-26
Coordinates
-6.1753, 71.5397
Coral cover
51%
± 3.1% SE, n = 10 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
8.1%
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
30
Site summary

A coral-dense forereef off South Brother, windward on Anderson's field sheet, with 51% coral cover. Tabular and corymbose Acropora in the shallows give way to massive Porites on the deepest transect. Published bleaching was 8.1%, the sampling sheet logs one colony as 35% sickly or diseased, and one crown-of-thorns starfish, the only one seen at the site, was photographed, as was an octopus (the field notes record a mating octopus). Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.5 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.0°Cii
Station CTD reading
+1.1°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
ii Station CTD value (LOF station records), not a dive reading: the CTD cast at this station recorded 29.98°C and no minimum (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records).
Bottom time
58 min
in at 13:48

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Thirteen other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

17 of the 30 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

26914161820222325262734

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB55 is a coral-abundant fringing forereef off South Brother in the Three Brothers group, windward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 26 March 2015 on a dive to 30.5 m.

General benthic features

The reef is a mix of Porites and Acropora, with Porites edging out overall; shallower ground is dominated by tabular and corymbose Acropora, while the deepest stratum, a single transect, is led by massive Porites (e.g., Image 3, Image 4, Image 15, Image 17, Image 24, Image 33).

Photographs show a structurally complex reef (e.g., Image 1, Image 5, Image 8, Image 10, Image 12, Image 30, Image 32).

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 8.1%. The bleaching percentage is a computer vision figure: CoralNet annotation of the informal survey images, not a diver's field estimate (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). A crown-of-thorns starfish was photographed beside a gloved hand holding forceps (e.g., Image 21); Anderson's sampling sheet notes it as the only one seen at the site.

One of the colonies sampled here was 35% sickly or diseased (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

An octopus was photographed (e.g., Image 11, Image 13, Image 29); Anderson's field notes for this dive record a “mating octopus.”

Comparisons with other data

Sannassy Pilly et al. (2024) surveyed a nearby station (South Brother), 0.20 km from the pin. Cover values from that work are not among the survey records shown on this page. Within 5 km, two independent stations recorded station-year means of 21–41% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2015; the nearest of these, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36004, 3.08 km away, read 21% in 2015.

Dive record

Anderson's afternoon dive on 26 March 2015 entered the water at 13:48 and lasted 58 minutes, to a maximum depth of 30.5 m (the field sheet), on a near-vertical wall with current and surge; the notes call the coral at 5–10 m spectacular. Anderson sampled two Pocillopora damicornis colonies: CHPd48 (collected 14:22 at 14.6 m; a small colony one to two years old, identity not certain in the field, on a survey transect next to the only crown-of-thorns seen at the site; confirmed as P. damicornis by RFLP) and CHPd49 (about 14:00, 15 m; collected by Sam). Anderson also sampled three pocilloporids for a collaborator: ChJo147 (13:59, 29.2 m; likely P. verrucosa, 35% sickly or diseased; tissue next to the diseased part was sampled), ChJo148 (14:05, 20.3 m; Pocillopora sp., healthy, with 50% old mortality), and ChJo149 (14:30, 8.5 m; Pocillopora sp., a huge, healthy colony of candelabrum form, common at the site). The notes record P. damicornis as present but very rare, and no P. acuta or Seriatopora. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'fringing reef', 'windward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (fringing reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin off the south-southwest side of South Brother, facing south-southwest (about 200°): side-on (close to the leeward cutoff) for the northwest monsoon winds of the March survey and side-on (close to the windward cutoff) for the southeast trades of April to November, so the imagery reads this station as side-on rather than windward; the aspect shown is the sheet's label.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)51.3
CoralNet43.3*n = 14 · SE 5.8
In-house DINOv333.8*n = 14 · SE 4.4
CoralSCOP edited38.3*n = 14 · SE 4.2
Claude33.2*n = 14 · SE 6.1

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 10.1 pp (33.2–43.3%) and read 8.0–18.1 pp below the in-water transect (51.3%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 14 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 3.70 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. (2025)—1 station, 2.98 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20151 station, 3.08 kmRecords ↓

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 6 records between 2006 and 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (51%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km. One further row in the table has no survey date, so it is listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)Great Chagos Bank200641% (5 records)3.70 kmdoi:10.3354/meps07436
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36004201521%3.08 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Spalding et al. (2025)Great Chagos Bank - Middle Brother, lagoon (E aspect, 1-3 m)pre-bleaching baseline50%2.98 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Sannassy Pilly S, Roche RC, Lange ID, Perry CT, Mogg AOM, Dawson K, et al. (2024). Coral carbonate production across depth: homogenisation after bleaching? Coral Reefs 43:1803-1818. DOI
  4. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF
  5. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI