Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos and Chagos Archipelago

One of Chagos's highest-cover reefs (62.4%), a sheltered lagoon patch reef at 26 m that is effectively all Acropora. In April only a handful of tables were white, but an unscored revisit two weeks later showed a visibly worse mosaic of whitened Acropora, Pocillopora, and mushroom corals, with a hawksbill turtle resting on a bed of pale tables. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Two other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Peros Banhos, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
8 of these 20 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BIPB74 is a protected submerged lagoonal patch reef inside Peros Banhos at 26 m, and one of the highest-cover reefs in the whole archipelago: 62.4% living coral against 32.0% algae, 7th of 109 Chagos sites, with bare substrate almost absent at 2.2% (e.g., Image 1).
Across 25 genera it is effectively a single-genus reef, Acropora holding 70% of all coral, Pavona the only other genus above 2.3% (e.g., Image 3, Image 8, Image 11).
The depth profile splits that average three ways: the shallowest transect is the mixed one, Acropora under half the coral and Pavona a quarter of it; the middle is a near-monoculture at 71% cover with Acropora at 86%; the deepest brings in Porites and Montipora.
The image cover figures (CoralNet 32.8%, Coralscapes 33.7%) pool both dives and so describe neither.
On 18 April published bleaching was 5.35%, in the lower third of the archipelago on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run, and the photographs matched — a handful of stark-white tables among pigmented neighbors (e.g., Image 2).
Its 16 reviewed frames show a reef visibly worse, a mosaic of whitened tabular and branching Acropora and wholly white Pocillopora and free-living fungiids, while the dark maroon foliose plates stay fully pigmented throughout (e.g., Image 4, Image 5, Image 9).
No crown-of-thorns or disease in either dive.
A hawksbill turtle was photographed resting on a bed of pale tables.
No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
The site was dived twice.
The 1 May revisit thirteen days later was photographed but never scored: no BIPB74B row exists in any published table, so the correct entry for May bleaching here is "not scored".
BIPB74 (Peros Banhos): surveyed twice, Apr–May 2015; 5.3% of coral bleached at the mid-April baseline (CoralNet analysis of informal survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans); revisited 1 May 2015 during the onset of the 2015 bleaching event (photo documentation only). Surveyed during the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 62.4 |
| CoralNet | 56.0 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 48.9 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 47.1 |
| Claude | 51.1 |
Coral bleached: computer-vision (CoralNet) estimate from the survey images, per dive, as published in Mayfield & Dempsey (2026), supplemental file S1.
| Date | Time in | Max depth (m) | Bottom time (min) | Coral bleached (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-04-18 | 14:21 | — | 48 | 5.3 |
| 2015-05-01 | — | — | — | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.