Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos (BIPB61)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-14
Coordinates
-5.3912, 71.7497
Coral cover
20%
± 2.0% SE, n = 15 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
12%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
26
25 shown on this page
Site summary

A windward channel reef on the west rim of Peros Banhos (dived to 30.2 m), with just 20% coral against 50% algae. Its slopes carry dense stands of large yellow-green sea fans and whip corals, which the coral transects never recorded, and Anderson filmed a manta ray on the dive. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.2 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.9°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.7–30.1°C
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.7–30.1°C.
Bottom time
47 min
in at 10:47

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

15 of the 25 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

47812131617212430

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIPB61 is a low-cover, algae-dominated windward channel reef on the west rim of Peros Banhos, dived to 30.2 m on 14 April 2015 (station CTD-cast midpoint 29.9°C).

General benthic features

Turf takes 24% of the benthos. Non-coral invertebrates take another 22%. Crustose coralline algae hold 15%, bare substrate 7.5%, turf-with-sediment 6.2%, erect algae 3.9%, and macroalgae 1.5%. This is a reef whose surface is largely turf, sessile invertebrates, and coralline pavement, with coral as the minority occupant. The coral that is present is a Porites assemblage with a thin tail. Porites alone holds 8.9% of the benthos — 45% of all coral recorded — followed by Acropora 4.5%, Pocillopora 2.3%, and Montipora 1.6%. Below that the list falls away fast: Leptastrea 0.5%, Astreopora, Favites, Favia, and Pavona 0.3% each, Montastrea 0.2%, and Gardineroseris, Symphyllia, Acanthastrea, and Millepora 0.1% each, then Goniastrea at <0.1% and a seven-genus floor at <0.1% each — Coscinaraea, Fungia, Galaxea, Heliopora, Oxypora, Scolymia, and Stylophora. Twenty-two genera are non-zero, but sixteen of them together account for under 2.5% of the benthos. The depth pattern is a shallow-to-deep genus handover, and the middle band is the poorest. D2 carries 24% coral and is the only band Acropora leads — 8.0% against Porites' 7.4%, with Pocillopora at 4.8%. D3 drops to 15%, the site's minimum, and the order inverts hard: Porites 9.0% against Acropora 2.6%. D4 recovers to 21% with Porites at its site maximum of 11% and Acropora at 3.1%. Genus richness runs the other way from cover — 9 genera at D2, 11 at D3, 18 at D4 — so the deepest band is the most genus-diverse, while Acropora is scarcest at D3 (2.6% of the benthos, against 3.1% at D4 and 8.0% at D2). Algal cover is high in all three bands (50%, 53%, 47%) and barely varies, which is the clearest signal that the algal dominance here is a site property rather than a depth effect. Gorgonian sea fans are the most conspicuous non-scleractinian element of this reef. One frame shows a slope falling into blue water carrying a dense stand of large yellow-green gorgonians and whip corals, with a haze of small planktivores above and only pale, sparsely colonized pavement beneath (e.g., Image 29).

Two frames show the same fans and dark whip corals along the slope, another catches them beside a deployed transect tape with a diver working above, and a fourth places them across a broad, low-relief mixed bottom of small massive domes, digitate colonies, foliose plates, and black finger sponges (e.g., Image 10, Image 15, Image 18).

None of these octocorals appear anywhere in the transect data, which records only scleractinians plus Millepora and Heliopora — so the 22% non-coral invertebrate figure is the only place they are counted, and their contribution is not resolved to taxon. Where coral does concentrate, it is Acropora in the shallows. Two frames show near-continuous corymbose and tabular Acropora thickets working with sergeant majors, black triggerfish, humbug damsels, and dense orange anthias — matching the D2 stratum, the only one Acropora leads (e.g., Image 19, Image 27).

Away from those patches the ground is exactly what the cover figure implies: two frames show wide pale pavement and rubble carrying widely spaced small massive domes and ruffled foliose colonies, and a third shows the same at depth with a scrawled filefish over largely bare substrate (e.g., Image 5, Image 9, Image 14).

Genus variety can be high within a single patch: a large massive Porites dome, encrusting and foliose plates, a clearly meandroid brain coral, small branching Acropora, orange sponges, red encrusting algae, and a pink sea whip occur together in one downward view. The site's other habitat is cryptic. Three frames are a sequence under a ledge or overhang holding a large aggregation of golden sweepers, with the ceiling carrying red and maroon encrusting algae and sponges, yellow encrusting sponges, ascidians, and green calcified algae; orange anthias and a reddish soldierfish or bigeye share the shelter, and two nurse sharks rest on the sand beneath the ledge (e.g., Image 2, Image 3, Image 6, Image 23).

Another frame covers the same habitat with a yellow-green whip coral and a scarred massive Porites dome on the sand at the overhang mouth (e.g., Image 20).

Formal surveys give 20% coral, 50% algae, and 22% non-coral invertebrates, the coral 45% Porites and led by Acropora only in the shallowest stratum.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 12% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). One image is unambiguous: a top-down frame of a single large, entirely white massive colony, its lobed surface fully pigment-free, sitting on dark turf-covered pavement among small unbleached colonies (e.g., Image 28).

One frame holds a white digitate colony on the pavement beside a pale cream soft coral, and two others each contain broad pale-to-white massive and plating colonies on the slope. The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded under 0.1% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Two nurse sharks rest under a ledge (e.g., Image 3). One frame adds a large emperor or snapper at close range. Anderson's field notes also record a manta ray on this dive, filmed ('MANTA RAY! Got great footage').

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, one independent station, Sheppard et al. (2008) at Peros Banhos, 3.20 km away, read a mean of 44% in 2006.

Dive record

Anderson's dive on 14 April 2015 entered the water at 10:47 and lasted 47 minutes, to a maximum depth of 30.2 m (the field sheet); the notes describe calm, slightly murky water, low coral cover, and a high-flow environment, and record a manta ray, filmed on the dive. Anderson sampled two pocilloporid colonies for a collaborator: ChJo162 (likely Pocillopora verrucosa; collected 11:04 at 24.6 m; large and healthy) and ChJo163 (Pocillopora sp.; 11:28, 12 m, as shallow as sampling was possible because the site has no 10 m depth; fairly healthy, candelabrum morphology). The notes record no Pocillopora damicornis, P. acuta, or Seriatopora at the site. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Reef type and aspect follow Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'channel reef', 'windward'): the LOF habitat map has no reef polygon within 65 m of the pin (nearest 'deep fore reef slope' 130 m); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (channel reef). The rim here faces west to west-northwest: windward of the northwest monsoon (December–March), leeward of the April–November southeast trades; the printed 'windward' is Anderson's sheet label.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)19.7
In-house DINOv322.1*n = 14 · SE 4.7
CoralSCOP edited32.5*n = 14 · SE 5.2
Claude17.0*n = 14 · SE 3.6

The three computer-vision methods disagree by 15.5 pp (17.0–32.5%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (19.7%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 14 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 3.20 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. (2025)—2 stations, 2.90 kmRecords ↓

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2006. The most recent nearby survey is from 2006, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (20%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km. 2 further rows in the table have no survey date, so they are listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)Peros Banhos200644% (5 records)3.20 kmdoi:10.3354/meps07436
Spalding et al. (2025)Peros Banhos - lagoon Knoll (N, 9-12 m)pre-bleaching baseline80% best patch2.90 km—
Spalding et al. (2025)Peros Banhos - lagoon Knoll (N, 6-9 m)pre-bleaching baseline70%2.90 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF