Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Salomon / Blenheim / Speakers Bank and Chagos Archipelago

A deep (33 m) exposed forereef outside Salomon atoll where anemones with anemonefish, soft corals, sponges, gorgonians, and giant clams cover slightly more ground than the coral itself (30.9%). Bleaching ranked among the worst in Chagos (19.2%), with stark-white colonies beside pigmented ones, and a silvertip-type shark, two giant morays, and an octopus were photographed. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Five independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Salomon Atoll, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
3 of these 43 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BISA102 is a deep exposed emergent forereef outside Salomon atoll at 32.8 m, surveyed 28 April 2015 (e.g., Image 1).
Across 24 genera the assemblage is Porites-led rather than Acropora-led, Porites holding 46% of all coral, Pocillopora 20%, and Acropora only 11%. Down the profile the Porites share climbs steadily — 39%, 34%, 52%, 58% — while genus richness collapses from 22 genera at the best transect to just five at the deepest, where invertebrates take 39.0% of the ground.
Formal transects recorded 30.9% coral against 30.6% algae — 75th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 87th for algae — but the number that defines the site is neither: non-coral invertebrate cover is 31.3% of the benthos, slightly more than the coral itself, and the photographs identify it as anemones with resident anemonefish, soft corals, encrusting sponges, gorgonians, and giant clams. Image methods read about 11 points below the transects (CoralNet 20.0%, Coralscapes 20.1%). Coral cover: 31%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 30.6% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 30.9% · CoralNet points 20% · Coralscapes masks 20.1% (35 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.
Published bleaching is 19.2%, 8th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column, and the imagery agrees: a branching colony stark white across every branch beside pigmented neighbors of the same size, three adjacent white colonies in another frame, a white corymbose colony against a healthy massive Porites (e.g., Image 3).
No crown-of-thorns, disease, or predation was seen.
A silvertip-type shark, two giant morays, and an octopus were photographed, and one frame is a blue-light fluorescence shot that must be kept out of any color-based scoring (e.g., Image 2).
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 30.9 |
| CoralNet | 31.1 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 30.1 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 34.4 |
| Claude | 21.5 |
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | 2006 | 1 station, 3.61 km | Records ↓ |
| Spalding et al. (2024) | 2024 | 1 station, 1.48 km | Records ↓ |
| Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report) | 2024 | 1 station, 1.48 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015 | 3 stations, 0.43–3.82 km | Records ↓ |
Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 10 records between 2006 and 2024. Surveys since 2021 average 65% (range 65%, n=2). This site's own estimate (31%) sits 34.1 points below the recent range (65%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | Salomon | 2006 | 32% (5 surveys) | 3.61 km | HeatCRD database |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36017 | 2015 | 22% | 0.43 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36015 | 2015 | 28% | 1.63 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36018 | 2015 | 22% | 3.82 km | — |
| Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report) | Salomon - Boddam Lagoon (N, 1-4 m) | 2024 | 65% | 1.48 km | — |
| Spalding et al. (2024) | Salomon - Boddam Lagoon (N, 1-4 m) | 2024 | 65% | 1.48 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.