Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA102)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-28
Coordinates
-5.3694, 72.2138
Coral cover
32%
± 2.4% SE, n = 16 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
19%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
36
Site summary

A deep fore reef outside Salomon atoll (dived to 29.7 m) where anemones with anemonefish, soft corals, sponges, and gorgonians cover nearly as much ground as the coral itself (32%). Bleaching was 19%, with stark-white colonies beside pigmented ones, and a silvertip-type shark, two giant morays, and an octopus were photographed. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
29.7 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.7°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.0–30.4°C
+0.6°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.0–30.4°C.
Bottom time
54 min
in at 15:04

Four independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

3 of the 36 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

4578910111213141516171819202122232526272829303132333536373840

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISA102 is a deep side-on fore reef outside Salomon atoll, surveyed 28 April 2015 on a dive to 29.7 m (e.g., Image 1).

General benthic features

Across 24 genera the assemblage is Porites-led rather than Acropora-led, Porites holding 40% of all coral, Pocillopora 21%, and Acropora only 10%. Down the profile the Porites share rises from 34–39% in the two shallower strata to 52–58% in the two deeper ones, while genus richness collapses from 22 genera in one stratum to just five in the deepest, where invertebrates take 39% of the ground.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 19%, and the imagery agrees: a branching colony stark white across every branch beside pigmented neighbors of the same size, three adjacent white colonies in another frame, a white corymbose colony against a healthy massive Porites (e.g., Image 3).

No crown-of-thorns, disease, or predation was seen. The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded under 0.1% cyanobacteria and under 0.1% recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

A silvertip-type shark, two giant morays, and an octopus were photographed, and one frame is a blue-light fluorescence shot (e.g., Image 2).

Comparisons with other data

The XL Catlin Seaview Survey covered a nearby station (transect 36017) in 2015, 0.43 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, four independent stations recorded station-year means of 22–32% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2015; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36017, 0.43 km away, read 22% in 2015.

Dive record

Anderson's afternoon dive on 28 April 2015 entered the water at 15:04 and lasted 54 minutes, to a maximum depth of 29.7 m (the field sheet); the notes call it a “spectacular wall dive” and record extensive bleaching of digitate acroporids and pocilloporids, at least 50% of each. Anderson sampled two pocilloporid colonies (Pocillopora sp.) for a collaborator: ChJo266 (collected 15:26 at 16 m; 50% bleached, at the edge of the thermocline; in a random survey of about 30 colonies, about half of the pocilloporids were bleached) and ChJo267 (15:32, 14 m; more than 90% bleached, pigmented only in the interior, near 30°C above the thermocline). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) records 'forereef' and leaves the aspect blank; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'exposed' (fringing reef). No LOF habitat map covers Salomon atoll (the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos), the field sheet gives no aspect, and the station's GPS position does not settle the aspect (relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds, it reads side-on from the atoll's center and windward from the nearest reef edge), so the aspect printed above is read from the station's position on satellite imagery (Esri World Imagery): the pin lies off the southwest tip of the atoll's outer reef, which faces southwest, side-on to the prevailing southeast trade winds.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)32.4
CoralNet31.1n = 27 · SE 3.9
In-house DINOv330.1n = 27 · SE 3.9
CoralSCOP edited34.4n = 27 · SE 3.1
Claude21.5n = 27 · SE 3.9

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 12.9 pp (21.5–34.4%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (32.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 3.61 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. (2025)—1 station, 1.48 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20153 stations, 0.43–3.82 kmRecords ↓

Within 5 km, 4 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 8 records between 2006 and 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (32%) sits 4 points above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (22–28%), inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. One further row in the table has no survey date, so it is listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)Salomon200632% (5 records)3.61 kmdoi:10.3354/meps07436
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36017201522%0.43 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36015201528%1.63 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36018201522%3.82 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Spalding et al. (2025)Salomon - Boddam Lagoon (N, 1-4 m)pre-bleaching baseline65%1.48 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF
  4. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI