Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB57)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-27
2015-03-28
Coordinates
-6.1598, 71.5271
Coral cover
43%
± 6.8% SE, n = 18 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
1.2%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
118
50 shown on this page
Site summary

A channel reef off the southeast side of Middle Brother, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, where a thin, algae-covered shallow flat deepens into a high-cover bank of table Acropora and columnar Turbinaria. A giant clam, anemonefish, an eagle ray, and a sea turtle were photographed, alongside a few bleached colonies. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.1 m
sample-sheet maximum (27 Mar 2015 dive)
Water temp. during survey
29.8°Cii
Station CTD reading; 27 Mar 2015 dive
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
ii Station CTD value (LOF station records), not a dive reading: the CTD cast of 27 March 2015, on the first of the station's three dives, recorded 29.8°C and no minimum (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records).
Bottom time
58 min
in at 16:17; 27 Mar 2015 dive

Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Fourteen other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

This page shows 50 of the 118 photographs from this site, including every one cited by image number in the text; the frames the text describes as not shown are not among them.

25 of the 50 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

1259141516192324252728303435363741424344454647

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB57 is a channel reef off the southeast side of Middle Brother in the Three Brothers group, leeward on Anderson's field sheet; it was dived three times, on 27 March (57A and 57B) and 28 March 2015 (57C).

General benthic features

Coral cover builds strongly with depth, from a thin, algae-covered shallow flat to a high-cover deep bank where tabular Acropora and columnar Turbinaria together make up the great majority of the coral present (e.g., Image 22, Image 26, Image 33, Image 38, Image 40).

Most of the coral in the photographs is well pigmented; the frames also show a giant clam (e.g., Image 20), a sea turtle (e.g., Image 61, Image 62), and anemonefish (e.g., Image 69), and an eagle ray was photographed on the 57C dive (photo not shown).

A few isolated bleached colonies were photographed: small stark-white branching colonies beside pigmented ones of the same form on coralline pavement (e.g., Image 8), and a bright-white branching colony beside a pigmented neighbor (e.g., Image 68). Image 52 shows a large table colony with about twenty small stark-white spots on its upper surface, possibly feeding scars; no corallivore is visible, and the cause is unclear.

Anderson's field notes contrast the dives: 57A and 57C crossed Acropora table meadows, Echinopora meadows, and blue coral, while the 57B dive was “unspectacular ... with tons of dead coral,” mostly dead Acropora table framework with lots of recruitment. Overall the reef presents as coral-abundant and structurally complex, particularly at depth (e.g., Image 3, Image 4, Image 6, Image 7, Image 10, Image 11, Image 13, Image 17, Image 21, Image 29, Image 31, Image 32, Image 39).

Anderson's sampling sheet records 24 colonies sampled here at 8.7–29.7 m: six Pocillopora acuta by RFLP; 11 Seriatopora hystrix and one P. acuta by field call; two P. verrucosa, two P. eydouxi and two Pocillopora sp. sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 100% bleached, with some diseased or partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Coral cover

Stressors

The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, two independent stations recorded station-year means of 21–41% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2015; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36004, 1.06 km away, read 21% in 2015.

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'channel reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (channel reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin off the southeast corner of Middle Brother's reef flat, in the channel toward the small islet to its southeast, facing east-southeast (about 110°): leeward for the northwest monsoon winds of the March survey and windward for the southeast trades of April to November; the sheet's 'leeward' matches the monsoon reading.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)42.8
CoralNet44.0n = 111 · SE 1.9
In-house DINOv333.2n = 111 · SE 1.5
CoralSCOP edited36.4n = 111 · SE 1.9
Claude43.4n = 111 · SE 2.1

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 10.8 pp (33.2–44.0%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (42.8%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Dive history

Coral bleached: computer-vision (CoralNet) estimate from the survey images, per dive, as published in Mayfield & Dempsey (2026), supplemental file S1.

DateSub-siteTime inMax depth (m)Bottom time (min)Coral bleached (%)
2015-03-27BITB57A13:0729.0521.2
2015-03-27BITB57B16:1730.15812.2
2015-03-28BITB57C08:1828.9654.6

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 1.89 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. (2025)—1 station, 0.80 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20151 station, 1.06 kmRecords ↓

Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 6 records between 2006 and 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (43%) sits 2 points above the range of these station-year means (21–41%), inside the 7-point method-noise floor (inconclusive); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. One further row in the table has no survey date, so it is listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)Great Chagos Bank200641% (5 records)1.89 kmdoi:10.3354/meps07436
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36004201521%1.06 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Spalding et al. (2025)Great Chagos Bank - Middle Brother, lagoon (E aspect, 1-3 m)pre-bleaching baseline50%0.80 km—

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF
  4. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI