Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP96)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-26
Coordinates
-4.9659, 72.2362
Coral cover
82%
± 3.3% SE, n = 15 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
4.2%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
18
Site summary

A Speakers Bank rim reef with 82% live coral (92% in the deeper depth stratum) and 12% algal cover (LOF transects, 2015). Overlapping Acropora tables form a multi-layered canopy that is largely healthy and well pigmented. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.7 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.9°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.8–30.0°C
+0.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.8–30.0°C.
Bottom time
48 min
in at 10:26

11 of the 18 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

4678141718

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISP96 is a rim reef on the west side of Speakers Bank, surveyed 26 April 2015 on a dive to 30.7 m (see Dive record below); Anderson's notes describe a very gradual slope from 30 m up to a reef crest at 13 m.

General benthic features

Almost nothing here is not coral: non-coral invertebrates hold 1.8% of the benthos, coralline algae 4.4%, turf 4.3%, bare substrate 3.5%, erect algae 2.0%, and macroalgae 1.3%. The assemblage is overwhelmingly one genus across 21 non-zero codes. Acropora holds 66% of the benthos — 80% of all coral recorded — with Porites a distant second at 6.3%, then Favia 1.6%, Montipora and Pocillopora 1.5% each, Astreopora 1.3%, Leptastrea 1.2%, Platygyra 0.8%, and Goniastrea 0.7%. Eleven further genera fall below 0.5%, among them Ctenella, Cantharellus, Echinopora, and Gardineroseris — so the reef is not literally monospecific, but it is close. Algal cover halves from 14% to 7.0%. Canopy structure is the defining habitat feature. Tables overlap at several levels, creating broad shaded refuges, narrow corridors, and a complex understory. One frame shows very large tables filling the foreground, the next run of frames shows how plate edges repeat across the field, and a later run shows contiguous tables broken only by small coral heads and encrusted substrate (e.g., Image 3, Image 9, Image 10, Image 13, Image 15).

Beneath it, red-purple encrusting material, massive colonies, smaller corymbose branches, and occasional sand or rubble pockets add the structural and taxonomic diversity that the smaller published categories record. Formal surveys give 82% coral, 12% algae, and 1.8% non-coral invertebrates, the coral 80% Acropora and rising to 86% of coral at D4. The photographs document an extensive multi-layered table canopy, encrusted understory framework, abundant schooling fishes, and two white colonies.

Coral cover

Stressors

Colony margins are often intact and pale-tipped and most surfaces remain gold-brown or olive, indicating retained pigmentation across the photographed canopy (e.g., Image 2).

Published bleaching is 4.2% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). One frame shows a small branching colony wholly white beside pigmented tables and darker neighboring branches (e.g., Image 12).

Another shows a wholly white corymbose colony beneath pigmented tables (e.g., Image 5).

Anderson's notes record badly bleached colonies within several meters of a healthy colony sampled, and the one Seriatopora hystrix found here was 50% bleached (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Fish abundance is visually notable. Two frames show streams of yellow-striped fusilier-like fishes above the tables and a third records another dense school over the canopy, with darker surgeonfish-like silhouettes and small reef fishes throughout (e.g., Image 11, Image 16, Image 1).

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's morning dive on 26 April 2015 entered the water at 10:26 and lasted 48 minutes, to a maximum depth of 30.7 m (the field sheet); the notes describe a gorgeous site dominated by healthy table Acropora, a very gradual slope from 30 to 13 m, where the reef crested, and no P. acuta or P. damicornis. Anderson sampled one Seriatopora hystrix, ChSe142 (collected 10:50 at 15.5 m; 50% bleached, pigmented at the base, likely still healthy; the only colony seen at the site). For a collaborator Anderson also sampled three pocilloporids (species by field call): Pocillopora verrucosa ChJo247 (10:37, 25.6 m; diseased; the diseased tissue was sampled), and Pocillopora sp. ChJo248 (10:50, 20.5 m; pale, likely still healthy) and ChJo249 (10:56, 14.7 m; healthy, with badly bleached colonies within several meters). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Anderson's sampling sheet calls it a "gorgeous site dominated by table Acropora"; the numbers bear it out. Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) labels this dive both 'rim reef', 'windward' and 'channel patch reef', 'leeward', so no aspect is shown; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Speakers Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin on the outer west rim of Speakers Bank, facing west: leeward for the southeast trades (about April to November) and windward for the northwest monsoon winds (about November to March).

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)82.4
CoralNet55.6*n = 18 · SE 4.9
In-house DINOv349.3*n = 18 · SE 4.4
CoralSCOP edited48.2*n = 18 · SE 5.8
Claude51.5*n = 18 · SE 5.1

The four computer-vision methods differ by 7.4 pp (48.2–55.6%) and read 26.8–34.2 pp below the in-water transect (82.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 18 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.