Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP101)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-28
Coordinates
-4.7925, 72.3456
Coral cover
52%
± 4.5% SE, n = 15 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
7.1%
Observations
bleachingdiseaserecent mortality
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
13
Site summary

An Acropora-dominated reef: half the bottom is live coral, and 80% of that is Acropora, spread as broad, overlapping golden-brown table corals. Only 13 coral genera were recorded, and the reef looks the same at both depths surveyed. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
25 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.9°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.4–30.4°C
+0.7°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.2°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.4–30.4°C.
Bottom time
47 min
in at 10:17

One other CRD dive site with its own page within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

9 of the 13 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

781013

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISP101 sits just inside the north tip of the Speakers Bank rim, on the lagoon side ('lagoonal' on Anderson's field sheet), surveyed 28 April 2015 on a dive to 25 m (see Dive record below).

General benthic features

BISP101 is compositionally lopsided and Acropora-dominated. Every other genus is small beside it: Montipora 3.6%, Pocillopora 2.7%, Leptastrea 0.5%, Psammocora 0.8%, Porites 0.6%, Astreopora 0.6%, and Favia 0.5%, with Pavona, Favites, Millepora, Cyphastrea, and Montastrea below that. Thirteen coral genera were recorded on the transects. Crustose coralline algae hold 15% of the benthos, turf 10%, bare substrate 8.5%, macroalgae 2.5%, and non-coral invertebrates only 2.5%. The genus order is the same in both depth strata: Acropora, then Montipora. What changes is richness and algal cover, which rises from 34% to 45%. Reef structure is broad and laterally continuous rather than vertically towering. Large golden-brown plates recur from the foreground to the limit of visibility, often overlapping or standing on short central stalks, creating repeated horizontal shelves a short distance above the substrate and leaving open corridors between colony bases (e.g., Image 2).

Two frames show the field extending across the frame; a later run of frames demonstrates that the pattern persists along the photographed route; another gives a close view of living table surfaces (e.g., Image 5, Image 12, Image 6, Image 9, Image 2).

Some plates appear thick and old, with irregular margins or localized dead patches; others retain fine radial branch texture and sharply defined edges. The spaces between the tables matter ecologically. Low rubble, consolidated pavement, and patches of brown or greenish growth form the understory, with occasional small branching and massive colonies (e.g., Image 1, Image 3).

The photographs document an extensive field of overlapping golden-brown tables above low pavement, rubble, and vegetated patches, shaded refuge beneath the plates, and localized bleaching in one pale branching thicket.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 7.1% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). The clearest example is a frame where a compact field of branching colonies is pale lavender to white while surrounding tables retain gold-brown pigmentation (e.g., Image 4).

Anderson's notes record many dead tables where the reef was scoured at about 15 m, and three of the four pocilloporids sampled were sickly or partly dead, possibly from disease (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.4% recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Several plate surfaces carry small dark fishes while others pass through the shaded gaps, so the table canopy provides habitat at multiple horizontal layers. A shark with the form of a nurse shark swims in the open over dead table plates (e.g., Image 11).

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's mid-morning dive on 28 April 2015 entered the water at 10:17 and lasted 47 minutes, to a maximum depth of 25 m (the field sheet); the notes describe more beautiful coral than on the earlier dive that morning (BISP100), with large Acropora tables from 25 to 20 m, a reef scoured at about 15 m with many dead tables, no P. acuta or Seriatopora hystrix, and odd thermoclines at around 15 m where the temperature dropped by 1°C or more. For a collaborator Anderson sampled four Pocillopora sp. colonies: ChJo262 (collected 10:35 at 15.7 m; healthy, green fluorescence in the interior, common at the site), ChJo263 (10:42, 15.6 m; enormous, 5% sickly, with some new mortality possibly from disease), ChJo264 (10:49, 14.8 m; 40% dead, possibly from disease), and ChJo265 (10:56, 14.3 m; huge, sickly, 20% diseased or dying); the notes add that these pocilloporids looked healthier than those on the bank fore reef. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Speakers Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin just inside the north tip of the Speakers Bank rim, on the lagoon side; Anderson's field sheet records only 'lagoonal', so no aspect is printed; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef).

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)52.2
CoralNet39.1*n = 13 · SE 4.5
In-house DINOv332.1*n = 13 · SE 5.0
CoralSCOP edited32.6*n = 13 · SE 3.9
Claude23.0*n = 13 · SE 5.1

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 16.1 pp (23.0–39.1%) and read 13.1–29.2 pp below the in-water transect (52.2%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 13 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.