Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Salomon / Blenheim / Speakers Bank and Chagos Archipelago
Ten independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Six other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Salomon Atoll, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
Assemblage composition from transect data. The transect records nine genera, and the reef is Acropora-led but not Acropora-only: Acropora 38.0% of the benthos (53.5% of live coral), Montipora 12.0% (16.9%), Pachyseris 7.0% (9.9%), Favia 4.0%, Porites 3.0%, then Goniastrea, Lobophyllia, and Montastrea at 2.0% each, and Astreopora 1.0%. H′ = 1.52, Simpson = 0.67, J′ = 0.69. The Montipora figure is the distinctive one — 12% of the benthos and 16.9% of live coral is a far larger plating/encrusting component than most Chagos sites carry, and with Pachyseris at 7% nearly a quarter of this reef's coral is plate-forming rather than branching or massive. Richness of 9 is third-lowest in the dataset, but see flag 2 — that number is not trustworthy. Algae and substrate. Total algae is 20.0% — second-lowest of these eight sites — split evenly between CCA 7.0% and erect algae 7.0% (35% each), with plain turf 5.0% and macroalgae 1.0%. Sediment-laden turf and cyanobacteria both read exactly zero, one of a handful of sites in the survey with no sediment-turf at all. Bare substrate 9.0%, pavement 21.0%, and sand, rubble, and non-coral invertebrates (PITS) all read zero. A high-cover, low-algae, CCA-and-erect-algae forereef with essentially no sediment signal.
The 71.0% headline is 71 points out of 100 on one transect. Coral cover: 71%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 20% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.
Dead coral is 8.0%, recently dead 0% — above the dataset mean of 4.55% but far below BIPB71's 15.67%. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
Replication — the site's central weakness, and it is severe. BISA98 rests on one transect, one depth stratum (D4), 100 points, one of only two single-transect sites in the dataset (the other is BIDI11, also in this pass). Every figure above is one 100-point read — hence the whole integers — and no standard deviation, depth profile, range, or confidence interval can be given for any of them. Marked `Training`. Exactly what a single short transect on a high-cover reef would produce. Among its neighbors, BISA98 is the only Salomon forereef above 40% — the other five run 25–39% on 24–34 genera each — making it doubly anomalous: far higher in cover and far poorer in recorded genera than every comparable reef on the atoll.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lange et al. (2021) | 2006–2020 | 1 station, 0.48 km | Records ↓ |
| MERMAID* | 2020 | 1 station, 1.89 km | Records ↓ |
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | 2006 | 1 station, 3.69 km | Records ↓ |
| Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report) | 2024 | 1 station, 3.81 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015 | 6 stations, 1.25–4.92 km | Records ↓ |
Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)Within 5 km, 10 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 21 records between 2006 and 2024. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 0.48 km away), went from 48% in 2006 to 21% in 2020. One survey since 2021 recorded 65%. This site's own estimate (71%) is indistinguishable from the recent value (65%): the 6.0-point gap is inside the ±7 percentage-point noise between methods; the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lange et al. (2021) | Salomon Atoll | 2006–2020 | 6.8–63% (5 surveys) | 0.48 km | HeatCRD database |
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | Salomon | 2006 | 32% (5 surveys) | 3.69 km | HeatCRD database |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36018 | 2015 | 22% | 1.25 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36013 | 2015 | 28% | 1.35 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36015 | 2015 | 28% | 3.57 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36014 | 2015 | 34% | 4.05 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36016 | 2015 | 19% | 4.61 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36017 | 2015 | 22% | 4.92 km | — |
| MERMAID* | Salomon 219 | 2020 | 30% (4 surveys) | 1.89 km | MERMAID |
| Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report) | Salomon - Boddam Lagoon (N, 1-4 m) | 2024 | 65% | 3.81 km | — |
Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.