Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA98)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Survey date(s)
2015-04-26
Coordinates
-5.3242, 72.2190
Coral cover
71%
Benthic surveys
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Water temp. during survey
30.7°C
+1.6°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)

Ten independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Six other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Site description

General benthic features

Assemblage composition from transect data. The transect records nine genera, and the reef is Acropora-led but not Acropora-only: Acropora 38.0% of the benthos (53.5% of live coral), Montipora 12.0% (16.9%), Pachyseris 7.0% (9.9%), Favia 4.0%, Porites 3.0%, then Goniastrea, Lobophyllia, and Montastrea at 2.0% each, and Astreopora 1.0%. H′ = 1.52, Simpson = 0.67, J′ = 0.69. The Montipora figure is the distinctive one — 12% of the benthos and 16.9% of live coral is a far larger plating/encrusting component than most Chagos sites carry, and with Pachyseris at 7% nearly a quarter of this reef's coral is plate-forming rather than branching or massive. Richness of 9 is third-lowest in the dataset, but see flag 2 — that number is not trustworthy. Algae and substrate. Total algae is 20.0% — second-lowest of these eight sites — split evenly between CCA 7.0% and erect algae 7.0% (35% each), with plain turf 5.0% and macroalgae 1.0%. Sediment-laden turf and cyanobacteria both read exactly zero, one of a handful of sites in the survey with no sediment-turf at all. Bare substrate 9.0%, pavement 21.0%, and sand, rubble, and non-coral invertebrates (PITS) all read zero. A high-cover, low-algae, CCA-and-erect-algae forereef with essentially no sediment signal.

Coral cover

The 71.0% headline is 71 points out of 100 on one transect. Coral cover: 71%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 20% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.

Stressors

Dead coral is 8.0%, recently dead 0% — above the dataset mean of 4.55% but far below BIPB71's 15.67%. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

Other notes

Replication — the site's central weakness, and it is severe. BISA98 rests on one transect, one depth stratum (D4), 100 points, one of only two single-transect sites in the dataset (the other is BIDI11, also in this pass). Every figure above is one 100-point read — hence the whole integers — and no standard deviation, depth profile, range, or confidence interval can be given for any of them. Marked `Training`. Exactly what a single short transect on a high-cover reef would produce. Among its neighbors, BISA98 is the only Salomon forereef above 40% — the other five run 25–39% on 24–34 genera each — making it doubly anomalous: far higher in cover and far poorer in recorded genera than every comparable reef on the atoll.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)2006–20201 station, 0.48 kmRecords ↓
MERMAID*20201 station, 1.89 kmRecords ↓
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 3.69 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report)20241 station, 3.81 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20156 stations, 1.25–4.92 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%20%40%60%80%200620152024Lange et al. (2021) 2006: 48%Lange et al. (2021) 2010: 63%Lange et al. (2021) 2018: 6.8%Lange et al. (2021) 2019: 23%Lange et al. (2021) 2020: 21%Sheppard et al. (2008) 2006: 32%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 19%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 22%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 22%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 27%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 28%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 34%MERMAID* 2020: 30%Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report) 2024: 65%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2015: 71%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-0.46 pp per year, not separable from zero; 7 years)
Lange et al. (2021) Sheppard et al. (2008) XL Catlin Seaview Survey MERMAID* Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report) Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 10 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 21 records between 2006 and 2024. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 0.48 km away), went from 48% in 2006 to 21% in 2020. One survey since 2021 recorded 65%. This site's own estimate (71%) is indistinguishable from the recent value (65%): the 6.0-point gap is inside the ±7 percentage-point noise between methods; the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)Salomon Atoll2006–20206.8–63% (5 surveys)0.48 kmHeatCRD database
Sheppard et al. (2008)Salomon200632% (5 surveys)3.69 kmHeatCRD database
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36018201522%1.25 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36013201528%1.35 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36015201528%3.57 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36014201534%4.05 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36016201519%4.61 km—
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36017201522%4.92 km—
MERMAID*Salomon 219202030% (4 surveys)1.89 kmMERMAID
Spalding et al. 2025 (Chagos 2024 bleaching report)Salomon - Boddam Lagoon (N, 1-4 m)202465%3.81 km—

Data & links

Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF
  4. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF