Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BICC51)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-25
Coordinates
-6.3002, 71.5696
Coral cover
17%
± 2.2% SE, n = 11 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
4.5%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
19
Site summary

BICC51 is algae-dominated, with 70% algal cover against just 17% coral, led by Pocillopora, ahead of Porites and Acropora. A whitetip reef shark rested under a plating colony, with fish traffic notably out of proportion to the modest coral cover. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
29.2 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.7°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.2–30.2°C
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.8°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.2–30.2°C.
Bottom time
55 min
in at 10:56

4 of the 19 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5678910111213141516171819

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BICC51 is a submerged bank reef inside the Central Chagos lagoon (dived to 29.2 m), leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 25 March 2015.

General benthic features

Its defining number is not its coral but its algae: 70% algal cover against 17% coral (e.g., Image 1).

About half that algal budget is sediment-laden turf at 35% of the benthos, with coralline algae at 15%, while clean fleshy turf is just 3.7% and bare substrate 7.5% (e.g., Image 2).

Among the 18 genera, Pocillopora holds 27% of the coral, Porites 19%, Acropora 18%, and Stylophora 10%.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 4.5%, and the 19 photographs show no unambiguous pallor, no disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns. Anderson's sampling sheet logs one of the two colonies sampled here as 5% bleached (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

A whitetip reef shark rests under a plating colony across three frames, and the schooling fish traffic is markedly out of proportion to the coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson sampled two pocilloporid colonies on this dive for a collaborator (species are field calls; the sampling sheet): Pocillopora sp. ChJo138 (collected 11:10 at 20.8 m; a large, healthy colony, polyps extended, among the few common corals at the site) and ChJo139 (11:18, 14.6 m; 5% bleached, an unusual growth form Anderson could not assign to a species, bleached part sampled). The dive notes record a slope from 13 to 30 m, some unusual Seriatopora-like Stylophora colonies at 25 m, and no P. damicornis, P. acuta, or Seriatopora hystrix at the site. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'submerged bank', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (patch reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers the Great Chagos Bank) shows open water with no visible bottom at the pin, inside the Great Chagos Bank lagoon, so it cannot test the aspect; the sheet's lagoon position stands.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)16.9
CoralNet21.9*n = 17 · SE 3.4
In-house DINOv324.1*n = 17 · SE 4.3
CoralSCOP edited27.5*n = 17 · SE 3.3
Claude20.7*n = 17 · SE 2.7

The four computer-vision methods agree within 6.8 pp (20.7–27.5%) and read 3.8–10.6 pp above the in-water transect (16.9%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 17 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.