Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle and Chagos Archipelago

BICC51 is algae-dominated, with 70% algal cover against just 17% coral, led by Pocillopora, ahead of Porites and Acropora. A whitetip reef shark rested under a plating colony, with fish traffic notably out of proportion to the modest coral cover. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Central Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
4 of the 19 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BICC51 is a submerged bank reef inside the Central Chagos lagoon (dived to 29.2 m), leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 25 March 2015.
Its defining number is not its coral but its algae: 70% algal cover against 17% coral (e.g., Image 1).
About half that algal budget is sediment-laden turf at 35% of the benthos, with coralline algae at 15%, while clean fleshy turf is just 3.7% and bare substrate 7.5% (e.g., Image 2).
Among the 18 genera, Pocillopora holds 27% of the coral, Porites 19%, Acropora 18%, and Stylophora 10%.
Published bleaching is 4.5%, and the 19 photographs show no unambiguous pallor, no disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns. Anderson's sampling sheet logs one of the two colonies sampled here as 5% bleached (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.
A whitetip reef shark rests under a plating colony across three frames, and the schooling fish traffic is markedly out of proportion to the coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
Anderson sampled two pocilloporid colonies on this dive for a collaborator (species are field calls; the sampling sheet): Pocillopora sp. ChJo138 (collected 11:10 at 20.8 m; a large, healthy colony, polyps extended, among the few common corals at the site) and ChJo139 (11:18, 14.6 m; 5% bleached, an unusual growth form Anderson could not assign to a species, bleached part sampled). The dive notes record a slope from 13 to 30 m, some unusual Seriatopora-like Stylophora colonies at 25 m, and no P. damicornis, P. acuta, or Seriatopora hystrix at the site. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).
Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'submerged bank', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (patch reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers the Great Chagos Bank) shows open water with no visible bottom at the pin, inside the Great Chagos Bank lagoon, so it cannot test the aspect; the sheet's lagoon position stands.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 16.9 | |
| CoralNet | 21.9* | n = 17 · SE 3.4 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 24.1* | n = 17 · SE 4.3 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 27.5* | n = 17 · SE 3.3 |
| Claude | 20.7* | n = 17 · SE 2.7 |
The four computer-vision methods agree within 6.8 pp (20.7–27.5%) and read 3.8–10.6 pp above the in-water transect (16.9%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
*Based on only 17 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.