Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle and Chagos Archipelago

BICC51 is the single most algae-dominated reef of all 109 Chagos sites surveyed, with 70% algal cover against just 15.4% coral, split fairly evenly between Pocillopora, Acropora, and Porites. A whitetip reef shark rested under a plating colony, with fish traffic notably out of proportion to the modest coral cover. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Central Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
4 of these 17 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BICC51 is a submerged bank reef inside the Central Chagos lagoon at 29 m under intermediate exposure, surveyed 25 March 2015.
Its defining number is not its coral but its algae: at 70.0% algal cover it is the single most algae-dominated of the 109 Chagos sites, 1st of 109, against 15.4% coral, which ranks 98th (e.g., Image 1).
Nearly half that algal budget is sediment-laden turf at 31.6% of the benthos, with coralline algae at 20.8%, while clean fleshy turf is just 3.0% — a figure ranking 104th of 109 that would invert the site's real standing if quoted alone (e.g., Image 2).
The 18 genera divide the small coral budget unusually evenly, no genus reaching a quarter of it: Pocillopora 25%, Acropora 21%, Porites 20%, Stylophora 12%.
Cover peaks at mid-depth, 12.7% to 20.2% and back to 13.3%, the lead genus changing hands at every station — Acropora and Pocillopora tied shallow, Pocillopora clear at mid-depth, Porites deepest — while algal cover never drops below 67.8% anywhere on the profile. No CoralNet or Coralscapes product exists for this site, so the transect figure is the only cover number it has. Coral cover: 15%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 70% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.
Published bleaching is 4.5%, ranked 74th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column, and the 19-frame review found no unambiguous pallor, no disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns.
A whitetip reef shark rests under a plating colony across three frames, and the schooling fish traffic is markedly out of proportion to the coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).
No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 15.4 |
| CoralNet | 21.9 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 24.1 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 27.5 |
| Claude | 20.7 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.