Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BICC51)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-25
Coordinates
-6.3002, 71.5696
Coral cover
15%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
4.5%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
17
Site summary

BICC51 is the single most algae-dominated reef of all 109 Chagos sites surveyed, with 70% algal cover against just 15.4% coral, split fairly evenly between Pocillopora, Acropora, and Porites. A whitetip reef shark rested under a plating colony, with fish traffic notably out of proportion to the modest coral cover. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
29.2 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.7°C
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.8°C)
Bottom time
55 min
in at 10:56

4 of these 17 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011121314151617

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BICC51 is a submerged bank reef inside the Central Chagos lagoon at 29 m under intermediate exposure, surveyed 25 March 2015.

General benthic features

Its defining number is not its coral but its algae: at 70.0% algal cover it is the single most algae-dominated of the 109 Chagos sites, 1st of 109, against 15.4% coral, which ranks 98th (e.g., Image 1).

Nearly half that algal budget is sediment-laden turf at 31.6% of the benthos, with coralline algae at 20.8%, while clean fleshy turf is just 3.0% — a figure ranking 104th of 109 that would invert the site's real standing if quoted alone (e.g., Image 2).

The 18 genera divide the small coral budget unusually evenly, no genus reaching a quarter of it: Pocillopora 25%, Acropora 21%, Porites 20%, Stylophora 12%.

Coral cover

Cover peaks at mid-depth, 12.7% to 20.2% and back to 13.3%, the lead genus changing hands at every station — Acropora and Pocillopora tied shallow, Pocillopora clear at mid-depth, Porites deepest — while algal cover never drops below 67.8% anywhere on the profile. No CoralNet or Coralscapes product exists for this site, so the transect figure is the only cover number it has. Coral cover: 15%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 70% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.

Stressors

Published bleaching is 4.5%, ranked 74th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column, and the 19-frame review found no unambiguous pallor, no disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns.

Fish and other fauna

A whitetip reef shark rests under a plating colony across three frames, and the schooling fish traffic is markedly out of proportion to the coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)15.4
CoralNet21.9
In-house DINOv324.1
CoralSCOP edited27.5
Claude20.7

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.