Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos and Chagos Archipelago

A windward fore reef slope on the north-east corner of Peros Banhos with 31 coral genera, dominated by Porites (61% of the coral) with Acropora fourth, at 43% cover. Roughly 23% of coral was bleached on two consecutive dives, with white corymbose and plate colonies scattered throughout and a pale-tentacled host anemone with its anemonefish. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Peros Banhos, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
16 of the 41 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BIPB114 is a windward fore reef slope on the north-east corner of Peros Banhos, facing southeast into the trades, with dives here on 2 May 2015 (to 26.7 m) and 3 May (to 31 m) (e.g., Image 16, Image 20, Image 33, Image 45).
Its defining feature is that Porites holds 61% of all coral while Acropora is only fourth at 5.5% of the coral (e.g., Image 19, Image 46).
Cover falls monotonically with depth, 57% to 39% to 23%, Porites leading every stratum while Acropora thins to 0.7% of the benthos (3% of the coral) at the deepest.
The site was dived twice on consecutive days and both dives were analyzed: published bleaching is 22.6% on 2 May and 22.7% on 3 May (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). The photographs show what that looks like: a fully white corymbose colony beside a pigmented brain colony under one strobe, a survey line laid directly across a stark-white plate, white branching colonies scattered through frame after frame — a serious, broadly distributed but minority signal on a reef whose Porites was largely still pigmented (e.g., Image 9, Image 10, Image 51).
A host anemone with pale tentacles and resident anemonefish was also photographed (e.g., Image 31, Image 52).
No crown-of-thorns or disease. Anderson's sampling sheet records 10 colonies sampled here at 11.0–26.2 m: eight Pocillopora sp. and two P. verrucosa sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 95% bleached, with some partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
Reef type and aspect follow the LOF habitat map: the pin sits inside 'deep fore reef slope' on the north-east corner of the atoll, where the slope faces southeast, windward of the southeast trades; the sheet agrees. Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) records 'fringing reef', 'windward'; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'exposed' (fringing reef).
BIPB114 (Peros Banhos): surveyed twice, 2 May 2015 and 3 May 2015, during the onset of the 2015 bleaching event; up to 22.7% of coral bleached (CoralNet analysis of informal survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans). Surveyed during the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 43.4 | |
| CoralNet | too few photos (n=7) | |
| In-house DINOv3 | 31.7 | n = 29 · SE 3.7 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 35.2 | n = 29 · SE 3.7 |
| Claude | 20.0 | n = 29 · SE 3.9 |
The three computer-vision methods disagree by 15.2 pp (20.0–35.2%) and read 8.2–23.4 pp below the in-water transect (43.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
CoralNet: this method was run on 7 of 29 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
Coral bleached: computer-vision (CoralNet) estimate from the survey images, per dive, as published in Mayfield & Dempsey (2026), supplemental file S1.
| Date | Sub-site | Time in | Max depth (m) | Bottom time (min) | Coral bleached (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-02 | BIPB114 | 16:48 | 26.7 | 48 | 22.6 |
| 2015-05-03 | BIPB114B | 07:27 | 31.0 | 61 | 22.7 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.