Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos (BIPB114)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-05-02
2015-05-03
Coordinates
-5.2572, 71.9758
Coral cover
40%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
22.7%
Computer vision (CoralNet), Mayfield & Dempsey (2026); mean of 2 dives
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
54
Site summary

A windward Peros Banhos forereef with 31 coral genera that is unusual for Chagos in being dominated by Porites rather than Acropora, at 40% cover. Roughly 23% of coral was bleached on two consecutive dives, with white corymbose and plate colonies scattered throughout and even a bleached host anemone with its anemonefish. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
26.7 m
dive-log maximum
Bottom time
54 min
in at 16:48

Two other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

17 of these 54 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

12357811141518232728303436383943444748495053545556575859606162636465

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIPB114 is an exposed, windward emergent fringing forereef outside Peros Banhos; the published survey-depth cell is blank, so the reef carries no depth on record (e.g., Image 16, Image 20, Image 33, Image 45).

General benthic features

Its defining feature is that Porites holds 61% of all coral while Acropora is only fourth at 5%, unusual for a Chagos forereef (e.g., Image 19, Image 46).

Cover falls monotonically with depth, 56.7% to 38.8% to 23.2%, Porites leading every transect while Acropora thins to 0.72% at the deepest.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 39.6% coral against 33.8% algae — 54th of 109 Chagos sites for cover — across 31 genera, the 14th-highest genus count of the 109, with more than a quarter of the reef neither coral nor algae (12.8% bare substrate, 13.9% invertebrates) (e.g., Image 4, Image 12, Image 24, Image 25, Image 40).

The image cover figures (CoralNet 19.6%, Coralscapes 18.9%) pool both dives. Coral cover: 40%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 33.8% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 39.6% · CoralNet points 19.6% · Coralscapes masks 18.9% (41 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.

Stressors

The site was dived twice on consecutive days and both were scored: under the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column it reads 22.6% on 2 May and 22.7% on 3 May, indistinguishable across 15 hours, as an already-established bleaching state should be. The site table's Mean(%bleaching) gives 2.5% for the same dive, the first training run and not canonical. The photographs support the higher figure: a fully white corymbose colony beside a pigmented brain colony under one strobe, a survey line laid directly across a stark-white plate, white branching colonies scattered through frame after frame — a serious, broadly distributed but minority signal on a reef whose Porites was largely still pigmented (e.g., Image 9, Image 10, Image 41, Image 51).

A bleached host anemone with resident anemonefish was also photographed (e.g., Image 31, Image 52).

No crown-of-thorns or disease.

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Survey summary

BIPB114 (Peros Banhos): surveyed twice, 2 May 2015 and 3 May 2015, during the onset of the 2015 bleaching event; up to 22.7% of coral bleached (CoralNet analysis of informal survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans). Surveyed during the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)39.6
CoralNet34.4
In-house DINOv331.7
CoralSCOP edited35.2
Claude20.0

Dive history

Coral bleached: computer-vision (CoralNet) estimate from the survey images, per dive, as published in Mayfield & Dempsey (2026), supplemental file S1.

DateTime inMax depth (m)Bottom time (min)Coral bleached (%)
2015-05-0216:48—4822.6
2015-05-03———22.7

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.