Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos (BIPB114)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-05-02
2015-05-03
Coordinates
-5.2572, 71.9758
Coral cover
43%
± 2.8% SE, n = 30 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
23%
Computer vision (CoralNet), Mayfield & Dempsey (2026); mean of 2 dives
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
41
Site summary

A windward fore reef slope on the north-east corner of Peros Banhos with 31 coral genera, dominated by Porites (61% of the coral) with Acropora fourth, at 43% cover. Roughly 23% of coral was bleached on two consecutive dives, with white corymbose and plate colonies scattered throughout and a pale-tentacled host anemone with its anemonefish. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
31 m
sample-sheet maximum (3 May 2015 dive)
Water temp. during survey
29.9°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.5–30.3°C; 3 May 2015 dive
+0.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint (LOF station records), not a dive reading: CTD cast of 3 May 2015 (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records).
Bottom time
61 min
in at 07:27; 3 May 2015 dive

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

16 of the 41 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

12357811141518232728303436383941434447484950

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIPB114 is a windward fore reef slope on the north-east corner of Peros Banhos, facing southeast into the trades, with dives here on 2 May 2015 (to 26.7 m) and 3 May (to 31 m) (e.g., Image 16, Image 20, Image 33, Image 45).

General benthic features

Its defining feature is that Porites holds 61% of all coral while Acropora is only fourth at 5.5% of the coral (e.g., Image 19, Image 46).

Cover falls monotonically with depth, 57% to 39% to 23%, Porites leading every stratum while Acropora thins to 0.7% of the benthos (3% of the coral) at the deepest.

Coral cover

Stressors

The site was dived twice on consecutive days and both dives were analyzed: published bleaching is 22.6% on 2 May and 22.7% on 3 May (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). The photographs show what that looks like: a fully white corymbose colony beside a pigmented brain colony under one strobe, a survey line laid directly across a stark-white plate, white branching colonies scattered through frame after frame — a serious, broadly distributed but minority signal on a reef whose Porites was largely still pigmented (e.g., Image 9, Image 10, Image 51).

A host anemone with pale tentacles and resident anemonefish was also photographed (e.g., Image 31, Image 52).

No crown-of-thorns or disease. Anderson's sampling sheet records 10 colonies sampled here at 11.0–26.2 m: eight Pocillopora sp. and two P. verrucosa sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 95% bleached, with some partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Other notes

Reef type and aspect follow the LOF habitat map: the pin sits inside 'deep fore reef slope' on the north-east corner of the atoll, where the slope faces southeast, windward of the southeast trades; the sheet agrees. Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) records 'fringing reef', 'windward'; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'exposed' (fringing reef).

Survey summary

BIPB114 (Peros Banhos): surveyed twice, 2 May 2015 and 3 May 2015, during the onset of the 2015 bleaching event; up to 22.7% of coral bleached (CoralNet analysis of informal survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans). Surveyed during the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)43.4
CoralNettoo few photos (n=7)
In-house DINOv331.7n = 29 · SE 3.7
CoralSCOP edited35.2n = 29 · SE 3.7
Claude20.0n = 29 · SE 3.9

The three computer-vision methods disagree by 15.2 pp (20.0–35.2%) and read 8.2–23.4 pp below the in-water transect (43.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

CoralNet: this method was run on 7 of 29 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Dive history

Coral bleached: computer-vision (CoralNet) estimate from the survey images, per dive, as published in Mayfield & Dempsey (2026), supplemental file S1.

DateSub-siteTime inMax depth (m)Bottom time (min)Coral bleached (%)
2015-05-02BIPB11416:4826.74822.6
2015-05-03BIPB114B07:2731.06122.7

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.