Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP89)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-24
Coordinates
-4.9517, 72.3830
Coral cover
34%
± 3.7% SE, n = 16 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
9.2%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
13
12 shown on this page
Site summary

A deep lagoonal patch reef on the windward side of Speakers Bank (dived to 30.2 m), with 29 coral genera but more algae than coral (34% coral against 54% algae). Dense branching coral patches alternate with open plate-and-rubble pavement, and stark-white colonies stand beside pigmented tables. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.2 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.9°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.8–30.0°C
+0.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.8–30.0°C.
Bottom time
53 min
in at 09:11

One other CRD dive site with its own page within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

6 of the 12 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

456789

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISP89 is a deep lagoonal patch reef inside Speakers Bank, windward from its position on the southeast side of Speakers Bank relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds (leeward on Anderson's field sheet), surveyed 24 April 2015 on a dive to 30.2 m (see Dive record below).

General benthic features

Twenty-nine coral genera were recorded, and the three depth strata hand the lead over twice: Acropora holds 54% of the coral in the shallowest stratum, Stylophora leads at mid-depth, and Porites leads in the deepest, where cover peaks and algal cover falls away. The photographs show coral-abundant branching patches (e.g., Image 2) alternating with open plate-and-rubble pavement (e.g., Image 3) and mixed fish schools (e.g., Image 11, Image 13).

Stark-white branching colonies and plates stand beside pigmented brown tables, with pale cream-yellow tables behind them in Image 10 and Image 12, as Anderson's dive notes record: all Seriatopora bleached, nearly everything bleached and dying around 15 m, and a black slimy sponge growing on everything (see Dive record below).

Coral cover

Stressors

The published image-based bleaching figure is 9.2%; of the seven colonies Anderson sampled here, five were partly to fully bleached and one more was pale and sickly (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and under 0.1% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's morning dive on 24 April 2015 entered the water at 09:11 and lasted 53 minutes, to a maximum depth of 30.2 m (the field sheet); the notes describe a back-reef pinnacle that looks like a lagoonal patch reef, technically part of the main bank structure, cresting at 12-13 m, with nicer corals at 20-30 m, many bleached or dead corals, nearly everything bleached and dying around 15 m, all Seriatopora bleached, a black slimy sponge growing on everything, and a mild current. Anderson sampled two Pocillopora acuta colonies (confirmed by RFLP): CHPd114 (collected 09:20 at 28.5 m; sickly and pale, uncommon at the site) and CHPd115 (09:39, 19.0 m; 10% bleached and sickly, possibly diseased, the only colony seen at 20 m). Anderson sampled three Seriatopora colonies (field calls): ChSe125 (S. hystrix; 09:15, 30.0 m; pale neon green, 100% bleached, live tissue still evident; most colonies at 25-30 m were 100% bleached), ChSe126 (S. hystrix or S. aculeata; 09:24, 25.9 m; 100% bleached, live tissue still evident), and ChSe127 (likely S. aculeata; 09:35, 21.0 m; very small, 100% bleached, live tissue still evident). For a collaborator Anderson also sampled two Pocillopora sp. colonies: ChJo227 (09:45, 15.3 m; healthy, with some old and new mortality) and ChJo228 (09:50, 15.5 m; in the early stages of bleaching, about 15%). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Anderson's field sheet records the aspect (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'lagoonal patch reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (patch reef). The aspect shown, 'windward', comes from the station's GPS position on the southeast side of Speakers Bank relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds (about 7° off the upwind direction; the reef-edge reading agrees), which takes precedence over slope facing, lagoon shelter, imagery, and field labels. Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Speakers Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin among patch reefs inside the south-east Speakers Bank lagoon, consistent with the sheet.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)33.7
CoralNet17.2*n = 13 · SE 3.4
In-house DINOv321.5*n = 13 · SE 5.8
CoralSCOP edited27.6*n = 13 · SE 5.4
Claude19.9*n = 13 · SE 4.7

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 10.4 pp (17.2–27.6%) and read 6.1–16.5 pp below the in-water transect (33.7%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 13 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.