Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB42)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-22
Coordinates
-6.0576, 71.5213
Coral cover
36%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
7.7%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
79
Site summary

A silt-laden bank forereef outside the Three Brothers lagoon, where sediment-covered turf outweighs coralline crust and Acropora peaks at mid-depth. Two colonies show clean bone-white skeleton that could be severe bleaching or very recent death, and gray reef sharks appear in four frames. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
21.7 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.7°C
+0.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
Bottom time
51 min
in at 10:48

Four other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

10 of these 79 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

36791014151617181920212324252627282932333536373839404142434445464748495051525355565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB42 is an intermediate-exposure submerged bank forereef outside the lagoon at Three Brothers, surveyed 22 March 2015 at 25 m.

General benthic features

This is a sediment-loaded reef rather than a coralline-paved one, with 16.7% non-coral invertebrates (e.g., Image 1, Image 5, Image 8, Image 22, Image 31, Image 34).

Across 26 genera, Acropora leads at 13.0% of the benthos, 36% of all coral, with Porites 9.5% and Montipora 4.3% making up three-quarters of the coral between them.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 36.2% coral against 33.3% algae — 63rd of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 78th for algae — but the algal budget is the departure: turf-with-sediment alone takes 14.8% of the benthos, more than the coralline algae at 8.6%, which is 89th of 109. The depth profile peaks in the middle and reshuffles at the bottom: 29.0% coral at the shallowest stratum with 45% algae and only four genera recorded, a 42.0% Acropora-dominated mid-depth peak where the genus holds 46% of the coral, then 37.6% at the deepest where Acropora collapses to 18% of coral, genus count reaches 23, and a quarter of the benthos is bare rock. Image methods read 13 points below the transects (CoralNet 23.3%, Coralscapes 22.4%) and should not be averaged. Coral cover: 36%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 33.3% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 36.2% · CoralNet points 23.3% · Coralscapes masks 22.4% (46 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.

Stressors

Bleaching on the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column is 7.73%, 52nd of 110 dives, mid-range and identical to the first run. Thirty of 51 frames were reviewed: two colonies show sharply demarcated bone-white skeleton, still clean and unfouled, though one still cannot separate severe bleaching from very recent tissue loss; other frames show much older, already overgrown mortality. No crown-of-thorns or disease; one frame holds a long-spined Diadema urchin that an automated pass could mistake for one.

Fish and other fauna

Gray reef sharks appear in four frames (e.g., Image 2, Image 4, Image 11, Image 12).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)36.2
CoralNet31.1
In-house DINOv324.4
CoralSCOP edited35.4
Claude22.6

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.