Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA93)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation โ€” Global Reef Expedition
โฌ‡ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-25
Coordinates
-5.2993, 72.2579
Coral cover
39%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
11.9%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021โ€“2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
38
Site summary

A seaward Salomon forereef at 30 m with 34 coral genera, among the most diverse in Chagos and including the endemic Ctenella, plus sea fans, black whip corals, and barrel sponges. Its published bleaching figure is 11.9%, but the photos look considerably worse, with whitening in most frames, including a massive dome bleached across exactly half its surface. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.9 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.0ยฐC
+0.9ยฐC vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1ยฐC)
Bottom time
58 min
in at 10:32

Five independent survey stations shown with the programโ€™s logo โ€” click one to see how far it is from this site.

Seven other CRD dive sites within 5ย km shown in orange โ€” click a marker to open its page.

5 of these 38 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

789101112131416171819202122232425262930313233343536373839404142

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISA93 is an exposed windward emergent forereef on the seaward side of Salomon at 30.4 m, surveyed 25 April 2015.

General benthic features

Genus richness is the site's strength: 34 genera, 5th-highest of the 109, including the Indian Ocean endemic Ctenella, on a reef where Porites alone holds 49% of all coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 39.1% coral against 34.9% algae โ€” 56th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 71st for algae, mid-pack on both โ€” with bare substrate very low at 5.5% and non-coral invertebrates unusually high at 20.5%, visible in the imagery as gorgonian sea fans, black whip corals, and barrel sponges that the transect protocol never resolves to taxon (e.g., Image 2).

The depth profile is a sharp peak and a collapse โ€” 38.0% coral shallow, a 58.6% second stratum where Porites reaches 36.7% of the benthos, then 39.4% at the most genus-diverse band with 26 genera, then a fall to 20.25% at the deepest, where algae takes 40.8%, bare substrate 17.1%, and Acropora is essentially gone at 0.45%. Image methods read 21 to 22 points below the transects (CoralNet 18.3%, Coralscapes 17.1%) and should not be averaged with them. Coral cover: 39%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 34.9% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 39.1% ยท CoralNet points 18.3% ยท Coralscapes masks 17.1% (28 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.

Stressors

Bleaching on the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column is 11.90%, 30th of 110 dives, the worst quintile, and both runs agree โ€” yet all 28 frames were reviewed and the photographs read considerably worse than 12%: colony-scale whitening appears in a substantial majority of them, including bone-white colonies beside fully pigmented neighbors under identical lighting and a massive dome bleached across exactly half its surface (e.g., Image 1, Image 5).

Pale plating Acropora and old exposed skeleton can inflate that impression, but not those cases. No crown-of-thorns, disease band, or fresh predation scar in any frame.

Fish and other fauna

Bluefin trevally were photographed hunting baitfish and a grazing school of thirty-plus parrotfish crossing the reef.

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. โš  The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. โš  SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)39.1
CoralNet38.7
In-house DINOv326.4
CoralSCOP edited26.4
Claude33.0

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)2006โ€“20201 station, 4.79 kmRecords โ†“
MERMAID*20201 station, 3.39 kmRecords โ†“
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20153 stations, 0.66โ€“3.85 kmRecords โ†“
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%200620132020Lange et al. (2021) 2006: 48%Lange et al. (2021) 2010: 63%Lange et al. (2021) 2018: 6.8%Lange et al. (2021) 2019: 23%Lange et al. (2021) 2020: 21%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 19%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 28%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 33%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 34%MERMAID* 2020: 30%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2015: 39%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-2.87 pp per year, not separable from zero; 6 years)
Lange et al. (2021) XL Catlin Seaview Survey MERMAID* Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 5 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 12 records between 2006 and 2020. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 4.79 km away), went from 48% in 2006 to 21% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (39%) sits within the range of these surveys (6.8โ€“63%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)Salomon Atoll2006โ€“20206.8โ€“63% (5 surveys)4.79 kmHeatCRD database
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36016201519%0.66 kmโ€”
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36014201534%1.14 kmโ€”
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36013201528%3.85 kmโ€”
MERMAID*Salomon 219202030% (4 surveys)3.39 kmMERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF