Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA93)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-25
Coordinates
-5.2993, 72.2579
Coral cover
41%
± 4.2% SE, n = 19 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
12%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
29
Site summary

A seaward Salomon forereef (dived to 30.9 m) with 34 coral genera, including the endemic Ctenella, plus sea fans, black whip corals, and barrel sponges. Published bleaching was 12%, and one photo shows a massive dome bleached across half its surface. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.9 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.0°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint; the cast read 30.0°C throughout
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.96–29.99°C.
Bottom time
58 min
in at 10:32

Four independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Seven other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

10 of the 29 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

78911141617181920212223252630313233

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISA93 is a fore reef on the seaward side of Salomon, windward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 25 April 2015 on a dive to 30.9 m.

General benthic features

Genus richness is the site's strength: 34 genera, including the Indian Ocean endemic Ctenella, on a reef where Porites alone holds 52% of all coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 12% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). Stark-white plating and massive colonies stand beside pigmented plates, massive and branching colonies in many of the photographs (e.g., Image 1, Image 5, Image 12, Image 29), and one massive colony is white across half its surface (e.g., Image 10).

No crown-of-thorns, disease band, or fresh predation scar in any frame. Anderson's sampling sheet records eight colonies sampled here at 10.0–30.9 m: three Seriatopora hystrix and one Seriatopora sp. by field call; three Pocillopora sp. and one P. verrucosa sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 100% bleached. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.3% cyanobacteria and under 0.1% recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Bluefin trevally were photographed hunting baitfish and a grazing school of thirty-plus parrotfish crossing the reef (e.g., Image 13, Image 24).

Comparisons with other data

Perry et al. (2015) surveyed a nearby station (Ile de Passe, Salomon) in March 2015, 0.28 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, four independent stations recorded station-year means of 6.8–63% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2020; the nearest of these, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36016, 0.66 km away, read 19% in 2015.

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'fore reef', 'windward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'exposed' (fringing reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Salomon atoll; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin about 100 m off the outer reef at the north-north-east tip of Salomon, facing north-north-east: side-on or leeward for the southeast trades (about April to November) and closer to windward for the northwest monsoon winds (about November to March); the aspect shown is the sheet's label.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)41.3
CoralNet38.7n = 27 · SE 3.8
In-house DINOv326.4n = 28 · SE 3.5
CoralSCOP edited26.4n = 28 · SE 2.7
Claude33.0n = 27 · SE 4.0

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 12.3 pp (26.4–38.7%) and read 2.6–14.9 pp below the in-water transect (41.3%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)2006–20201 station, 4.79 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20153 stations, 0.66–3.85 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%200620132020Lange et al. (2021) 2006: 48%Lange et al. (2021) 2010: 63%Lange et al. (2021) 2018: 6.8%Lange et al. (2021) 2019: 23%Lange et al. (2021) 2020: 21%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 19%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 28%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 34%LOF Global Reef Expedition 2015: 41%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)
Lange et al. (2021) XL Catlin Seaview Survey LOF Global Reef ExpeditionYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)

Within 5 km, 4 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 8 records between 2006 and 2020. The one station surveyed in more than one year declined by 27 points between its first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 4.79 km away), went from 48% in 2006 to 21% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (41%) sits just over 7 points above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (19–34%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)Salomon Atoll2006–20206.8–63% (range of yearly means; 5 records)4.79 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-021-02184-w
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36016201519%0.66 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36014201534%1.14 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36013201528%3.85 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF
  3. Perry CT, Murphy GN, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Januchowski-Hartley FA, East HK (2015). Remote coral reefs can sustain high growth potential and may match future sea-level trends. Scientific Reports 5:18289. DOI
  4. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI