Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank North (BINI80)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-21
Coordinates
-5.7125, 72.0457
Coral cover
43%
Benthic surveys
Observations
not yet tagged for this site
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
25
Site summary

An Acropora-dominated bank reef on the northern Great Chagos Bank caught in an active crown-of-thorns outbreak, with at least eleven starfish in five frames, including a group of six or more on freshly killed white skeleton. Coral cover is 43%, halving from about 53% in the shallows to 24% at depth. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
29.8 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.8°C
+0.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
Bottom time
54 min
in at 09:09

4 of these 25 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5678910111213141516171819202122232425

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BINI80 is a protected submerged bank reef on the north of the Great Chagos Bank, filed to Nelson Island, dived twice on 21 April 2015; the published site-depth cell is blank, so the reef has no absolute depth on record.

General benthic features

The assemblage is overwhelmingly monogeneric: across 20 genera, Acropora alone is 32.2% of the benthos, 75% of every coral on the site (e.g., Image 2, Image 3).

Unusually there is no genus handover with depth — Acropora leads every station, 79%, 77%, and 62% of transect coral — while absolute cover halves, from 53.0% shallow to 24.0% deep.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 42.8% coral against 39.5% algae — 41st of 109 Chagos sites for cover — with fleshy turf at 19.4% of the benthos, 7th-highest of 109, only 8.4% coralline algae and 16.4% bare substrate (e.g., Image 1).

No CoralNet or Coralscapes product exists for this site, so the transect figure is its only cover number. Coral cover: 43%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 39.5% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.

Stressors

Crown-of-thorns predation is the finding, and it is unambiguous: at least eleven sightings across five frames in one day, including an aggregation of six or more animals on freshly exposed white skeleton and one starfish sitting exactly on the boundary between living plate tissue and fresh kill, on a reef three-quarters composed of their preferred prey (e.g., Image 4).

The published bleaching cell is blank, one of 11 of 109 Chagos sites with no value in either CoralNet run, and no substitute was computed — which here is just as well, since white Acropora on a reef with active feeding fronts cannot be told from bleached tissue in a single still.

Fish and other fauna

Whitetip reef sharks appear on both dives.

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)42.8
CoralNet26.8
In-house DINOv336.9
CoralSCOP edited34.9
Claude29.4

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.