Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank North (BINI80)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-21
Coordinates
-5.7125, 72.0457
Coral cover
49%
± 5.6% SE, n = 18 transects · Benthic surveys
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
24
22 shown on this page
Site summary

An Acropora-dominated bank reef on the northern Great Chagos Bank caught in an active crown-of-thorns outbreak, with at least eleven starfish in five frames, including about three on freshly killed white skeleton. Coral cover is 49%, halving from about 53% in the shallows to 24% at depth. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.4 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.8°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint; the cast read 29.8°C throughout
+0.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records).
Bottom time
51 min
in at 11:31

6 of the 22 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011121314171819202122

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BINI80 is a protected submerged bank reef on the north of the Great Chagos Bank, filed to Nelson Island, dived twice on 21 April 2015.

General benthic features

The assemblage is overwhelmingly monogeneric: across 20 genera, Acropora alone is 38% of the benthos, 77% of every coral on the site (e.g., Image 2, Image 3).

There is no genus handover with depth — Acropora leads every station, 79%, 77%, and 63% of transect coral — while absolute cover halves, from 53% shallow to 24% deep.

Coral cover

Stressors

Crown-of-thorns predation is the finding, and it is unambiguous: at least eleven sightings across five frames in one day, including about three animals on freshly exposed white table skeleton and one starfish sitting exactly on the boundary between living plate tissue and fresh kill, on a reef where their preferred prey, Acropora, makes up three-quarters of the coral (e.g., Image 4).

No bleaching figure was published for this site, and none is estimated here, since white Acropora on a reef with active feeding fronts cannot be told from bleached tissue in a single still. The expedition's field report describes an active crown-of-thorns outbreak at this station (NI80): 194 starfish were counted within a 10 × 50 m area, concentrated around the large table corals, and about 30% of the tables showed recent crown-of-thorns feeding, 10% were dead and 10% had white syndrome (Bruckner 2015, LOF Global Reef Expedition BIOT Field Report, p. 15). Anderson's sampling sheet records four colonies sampled here: Seriatopora hystrix ChSe96 (28.9 m, 50% bleached (outer branches)), ChSe97 (26.8 m, >90% bleached), ChSe98 (30.2 m, >90% bleached, likely unhealthy), and ChSe99 (25.0 m, >90% bleached). It also records four other pocilloporids sampled for a collaborator (species by field call): Pocillopora sp. ChJo205 (15.6 m, 20% bleached), ChJo207 (13.0 m, 25% bleached), and ChJo208 (13.0 m, large, healthy, unscathed in a crown-of-thorns-damaged area); Pocillopora verrucosa ChJo206 (13.8 m, 70% bleached). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.2% recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

One large shark rests among the tables on the first dive (e.g., Image 15, Image 16): a stout body with two similar-sized dorsal fins set far back and no white fin tips, the shape of a nurse shark; no shark appears in the second dive's frames.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)49.1
CoralNet26.8*n = 14 · SE 3.3
In-house DINOv336.9n = 24 · SE 3.1
CoralSCOP edited34.9n = 24 · SE 2.5
Claude29.4n = 24 · SE 3.3

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 10.1 pp (26.8–36.9%) and read 12.2–22.3 pp below the in-water transect (49.1%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 14 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Bruckner AW (2015). Global Reef Expedition: British Indian Ocean Territory. Field Report. Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation, Annapolis, MD. 36 pp. PDF