Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank (BIVB99)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-27
Coordinates
-5.5310, 72.2451
Coral cover
60%
± 4.0% SE, n = 16 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
6.8%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
11
Site summary

A blue-coral reef: Heliopora makes up more than four-fifths of all coral here, at 60% cover. Photos show dense thickets of upright folded blades standing at many heights. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
31.2 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.9°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint; the cast read 29.9°C throughout
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.89–29.90°C. Anderson's sampling-sheet note for the dive gives nearly 30°C; the CTD cast is the station value shown.
Bottom time
55 min
in at 07:27

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

6 of the 11 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567911

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIVB99 is a lagoonal patch reef on Victory Bank, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 27 April 2015 on a dive to 31.2 m (see Dive record below).

General benthic features

BIVB99 is a blue-coral reef. Heliopora holds 49% of the benthos — 82% of all coral recorded. Every other genus is marginal: Stylophora 4.7%, Acropora 2.4%, Pocillopora 1.5%, Montipora 0.4%, Gardineroseris and Favia 0.3% each, and Pavona, Hydnophora, and Echinopora 0.2% each, with a further tail below that across 17 non-zero codes. Coralline algae hold 14% of the benthos, turf 9.8%, erect algae 8.0%, bare substrate 3.7%, macroalgae 3.3%, and non-coral invertebrates only 0.9%. Both depth strata are Heliopora stands and the shallower one is nearly a monoculture. Algal cover is high and steady in both bands (34% and 38%). Here the thicket is the subject. Two frames show extensive vertical relief where upright folded sheets occupy most of the available hard surface (e.g., Image 2); another shows repeated ridges and folded blades standing at multiple heights (e.g., Image 3); a short later run of frames retains that dense structure, interrupted by compact branching colonies and bright red-purple encrusting material.

The sequence begins at a sandier margin, with open sand and scattered low colonies beside a table in the foreground, then moves quickly into the thicket (e.g., Image 1).

The upright, folded, blade-like growth form in these frames is exactly what a blue coral (Heliopora) stand looks like, as in Image 3 and Image 8.

The habitat is structurally intricate, its complexity generated by upright sheets rather than broad tables, with narrow channels and cavities between closely packed vertical blades. Red, pink, and purple encrusting surfaces are abundant beneath the sheets; some are compatible with crustose coralline algae — which the transects put at 14% — while others could be sponges or other encrusting organisms. The photographs document the blue-coral thicket itself — upright folded blades at multiple heights — plus heavy red-purple encrustation, a sandier outer margin, and localized bleaching restricted to compact branching colonies rather than the dominant sheets.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 6.8% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1), and Anderson's notes record numerous bleached pocilloporids and dying Seriatopora at 25-30 m, and all four Seriatopora colonies sampled were fully or likely fully bleached (see Dive record below). One frame shows several compact branching colonies nearly white across intact branches, immediately adjacent to purple-pigmented compact colonies and dark upright sheets (e.g., Image 10); smaller white colonies recur in wider frames (e.g., Image 4).

The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Small reef fishes use the narrow spaces between folds and branches throughout.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's early-morning dive on 27 April 2015, the one dive that day, entered the water at 07:27 and lasted 55 minutes, to a maximum depth of 31.2 m (the field sheet); the notes describe a site dominated by blue coral from 23 to 13 m (the shallowest depth, 13.5 m), a reef that looked spectacular below 30 m, mostly Halimeda and dying Seriatopora at 25-30 m, numerous bleached pocilloporids, and calm water with surge and a current that picked up as the dive progressed; there was no P. acuta. Anderson sampled one Pocillopora damicornis (confirmed by RFLP), CHPd141 (collected 07:56 at 24.0 m; healthy, the only one seen, at the base of the blue-coral reef, “likely to be the real P. damicornis”), and four Seriatopora hystrix: ChSe146 (07:34, 30.2 m; 100% bleached, common below 30 m, live tissue not evident), ChSe147 (07:38, 26.1 m; neon-green fluorescent, likely 100% bleached), ChSe148 (07:44, 25.1 m; 100% bleached, alone in the sand, possibly dead), and ChSe149 (07:54, 26.5 m; large, 100% bleached, being overgrown by algae, possibly dead). For a collaborator Anderson also sampled four Pocillopora sp. colonies: ChJo252 (07:49, 20.6 m; pale, likely healthy), ChJo253 (08:05, 15.9 m; 80% bleached), ChJo254 (08:10, 14.6 m; more than 90% bleached, with several 100% bleached colonies nearby), and ChJo255 (08:16, 14.4 m; more than 90% bleached, live tissue still evident). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'lagoonal patch reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (patch reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Victory Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows only open water over the submerged bank at the pin, so the aspect cannot be checked from imagery.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)60.0
CoralNet20.8*n = 11 · SE 3.6
In-house DINOv324.5*n = 11 · SE 3.3
CoralSCOP edited18.5*n = 11 · SE 4.8
Claude35.4*n = 11 · SE 5.0

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 16.9 pp (18.5–35.4%) and read 24.6–41.5 pp below the in-water transect (60.0%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 11 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.