Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos and Chagos Archipelago

A leeward lagoonal pinnacle reef in Peros Banhos (dived to 25.8 m) where Acropora makes up 91% of the coral, as dense staghorn thickets and table shelves over old dead framework in the shallows; cover across the station is 56%. Published bleaching is 2.0%, but several photos show white table corals, and three of the Seriatopora colonies Anderson sampled were more than 90% bleached. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
Five other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Peros Banhos, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
24 of the 31 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
A leeward lagoonal pinnacle reef in Peros Banhos (branching coral dominated on the LOF habitat map), dived to 25.8 m on 15 April 2015.
The reef is overwhelmingly a single-genus system: Acropora makes up 91% of all coral recorded, forming dense staghorn thickets and tabular shelf structures over standing dead-coral framework in the shallows (e.g., Image 1, Image 3, Image 7, Image 8, Image 10, Image 11, Image 12, Image 13, Image 14, Image 16, Image 17, Image 21, Image 24, Image 32).
Coral cover and Acropora dominance both fall sharply with depth, giving way in the deepest stratum to a sparse, algae-dominated community of scattered massive corals (e.g., Image 5, Image 9, Image 23, Image 26, Image 30).
Published bleaching is 2.0% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1), but several photographs show colony-scale white pallor among the tabular corals (e.g., Image 4, Image 15, Image 20, Image 29, Image 33), and Anderson's sampling sheet records three Seriatopora hystrix colonies more than 90% bleached (ChSe65–ChSe67) and a 20%-bleached pocilloporid (CHPd74).
The bleaching percentage is a computer vision figure: CoralNet annotation of the informal survey images, not a diver's field estimate (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). Anderson's sampling sheet records nine colonies sampled here at 9.5–25.5 m: three Pocillopora acuta and one P. damicornis by RFLP; three Seriatopora hystrix by field call; two Pocillopora sp. sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to >90% bleached, with some partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.2% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, two independent stations recorded station-year means of 27–44% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2015; the nearest, Sheppard et al. (2008) at Peros Banhos, 2.82 km away, read a mean of 44% in 2006.
Reef type follows the LOF habitat map: the pin lies 1 m from 'lagoonal pinnacle reefs - branching coral dominated' inside the lagoon; a lagoon pin has no rim facing. Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) records 'lagoonal patch reef', 'leeward'; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (patch reef).
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 56.0 | |
| In-house DINOv3 | 33.3 | n = 29 · SE 3.2 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 38.4 | n = 29 · SE 3.3 |
| Claude | 35.0 | n = 29 · SE 5.3 |
The three computer-vision methods agree within 5.1 pp (33.3–38.4%) and read 17.6–22.7 pp below the in-water transect (56.0%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | 2006 | 1 station, 2.82 km | Records ↓ |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | — | 2 stations, 1.91 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015 | 1 station, 4.62 km | Records ↓ |
Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 6 records between 2006 and 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (56%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km. 2 further rows in the table have no survey date, so they are listed but not part of this summary.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | Peros Banhos | 2006 | 44% (5 records) | 2.82 km | doi:10.3354/meps07436 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36006 | 2015 | 27% | 4.62 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | Peros Banhos - lagoon Knoll (N, 9-12 m) | pre-bleaching baseline | 80% best patch | 1.91 km | — |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | Peros Banhos - lagoon Knoll (N, 6-9 m) | pre-bleaching baseline | 70% | 1.91 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.