Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank (BIVB81)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-21
Coordinates
-5.5344, 72.2159
Coral cover
43%
± 5.3% SE, n = 9 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
5.1%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
5
Site summary

A submerged rim reef on Victory Bank, leeward on Anderson's field sheet (dived to 31.1 m), with 43% coral, led by Acropora, over silty turf and macroalgae. Cover runs from 34% in the mid-depth stratum to 78% on the single deepest transect, and photos show a near-continuous stand of whorled plate coral and stark-white branching colonies beside pigmented ones. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
31.1 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.7°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.5–29.9°C
+0.7°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.5–29.9°C.
Bottom time
27 min
in at 16:57

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of the 5 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIVB81 is a submerged rim reef on Victory Bank, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 21 April 2015 on a dive to 31.1 m (see Dive record below).

General benthic features

The coral is packed into just 17 genera, and Acropora alone holds 43% of all coral present.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 5.1% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). The photographs show small stark-white fine-branching colonies beside pigmented table, plating, and massive colonies (e.g., Image 1, Image 2), like the fully bleached Seriatopora colonies that Anderson's notes record as fairly common at 25-30 m, the only depths reached on this late-afternoon dive, and a near-continuous whorled foliose stand (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

One of the two Seriatopora colonies sampled was 100% bleached (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's late-afternoon dive on 21 April 2015 entered the water at 16:57 and lasted 27 minutes, to a maximum depth of 31.1 m (the field sheet); the notes describe a very deep submerged bank with beautiful corals at 25-30 m, calm and reasonably clear water but low light so late in the day, and no P. acuta; the shallows could not be found. Anderson sampled two Seriatopora sp. colonies: ChSe100 (collected 17:05 at 31.0 m; large, 100% bleached with a neon-blue hue, fairly common at 25-30 m) and ChSe101 (17:09, 30.0 m; a fluorescent green colony with short, thin, tapered branches, “never before seen,” health unclear). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'submerged rim reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Victory Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows only open water over the submerged bank at the pin, so the aspect cannot be checked from imagery.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)42.9
CoralNettoo few photos (n=5)
In-house DINOv3too few photos (n=5)
CoralSCOP editedtoo few photos (n=5)
Claudetoo few photos (n=5)

CoralNet: this method was run on 5 of 5 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

In-house DINOv3: this method was run on 5 of 5 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

CoralSCOP edited: this method was run on 5 of 5 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Claude: this method was run on 5 of 5 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.