Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank / Great Chagos Bank North and Chagos Archipelago

A submerged rim reef on Victory Bank, leeward on Anderson's field sheet (dived to 31.1 m), with 43% coral, led by Acropora, over silty turf and macroalgae. Cover runs from 34% in the mid-depth stratum to 78% on the single deepest transect, and photos show a near-continuous stand of whorled plate coral and stark-white branching colonies beside pigmented ones. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Victory Bank, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
4 of the 5 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BIVB81 is a submerged rim reef on Victory Bank, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 21 April 2015 on a dive to 31.1 m (see Dive record below).
The coral is packed into just 17 genera, and Acropora alone holds 43% of all coral present.
Published bleaching is 5.1% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). The photographs show small stark-white fine-branching colonies beside pigmented table, plating, and massive colonies (e.g., Image 1, Image 2), like the fully bleached Seriatopora colonies that Anderson's notes record as fairly common at 25-30 m, the only depths reached on this late-afternoon dive, and a near-continuous whorled foliose stand (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).
One of the two Seriatopora colonies sampled was 100% bleached (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
Anderson's late-afternoon dive on 21 April 2015 entered the water at 16:57 and lasted 27 minutes, to a maximum depth of 31.1 m (the field sheet); the notes describe a very deep submerged bank with beautiful corals at 25-30 m, calm and reasonably clear water but low light so late in the day, and no P. acuta; the shallows could not be found. Anderson sampled two Seriatopora sp. colonies: ChSe100 (collected 17:05 at 31.0 m; large, 100% bleached with a neon-blue hue, fairly common at 25-30 m) and ChSe101 (17:09, 30.0 m; a fluorescent green colony with short, thin, tapered branches, “never before seen,” health unclear). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).
Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'submerged rim reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Victory Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows only open water over the submerged bank at the pin, so the aspect cannot be checked from imagery.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 42.9 | |
| CoralNet | too few photos (n=5) | |
| In-house DINOv3 | too few photos (n=5) | |
| CoralSCOP edited | too few photos (n=5) | |
| Claude | too few photos (n=5) |
CoralNet: this method was run on 5 of 5 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
In-house DINOv3: this method was run on 5 of 5 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
CoralSCOP edited: this method was run on 5 of 5 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
Claude: this method was run on 5 of 5 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.