Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank / Great Chagos Bank North and Chagos Archipelago

A sheltered lagoon-rim reef on Victory Bank at 29 m with 51.7% coral, mostly Acropora, over unusually silty turf and macroalgae. Cover jumps from 34% at mid-depth to 78% on the deepest transect, and photos show a near-continuous stand of whorled plate coral the survey did not record. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Victory Bank, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
4 of these 5 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BIVB81 sits on the protected, submerged rim of Victory Bank, inside the lagoon at 29.4 m, surveyed 21 April 2015.
The coral is packed into just 17 genera (88th of 109), and Acropora alone holds 58% of all coral present.
Formal transects recorded 51.7% coral against 44.3% algae — 22nd of 109 Chagos sites for cover — but the algal budget is unusual: 22.8 points of it is sediment-laden turf and 11.8 points macroalgae, with crustose coralline algae at only 4.8%, 103rd of 109 (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).
The depth profile is the real finding: cover dips to 34.0% at mid-depth, then more than doubles to 78.0% at the deepest transect, where Acropora accounts for 83% of the coral there — so the site-level figure describes no single station. Image-based methods read this reef well below the transects — CoralNet 32.7%, Coralscapes 36.6% against 51.7% — and the three are not interchangeable. Coral cover: 52%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 44.2% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 51.7% · CoralNet points 32.7% · Coralscapes masks 36.6% (5 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.
Published bleaching is 5.1%, and the rank of 69th of 98 comes off the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column. The photographs show mostly normally pigmented colonies, several white elements logged as ambiguous rather than confirmed bleaching, no disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns, and a near-continuous whorled foliose stand the transect genus list does not account for (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).
No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 51.7 |
| CoralNet | 37.8 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 44.7 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 49.2 |
| Claude | 56.7 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.