Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BIEA52)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-25
Coordinates
-6.1988, 71.4931
Coral cover
34%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
0.0%
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
15
Site summary

BIEA52, despite being filed under Eagle Island, sits close enough to Three Brothers that it likely belongs there instead. It carries a balanced, no-single-taxon-dominant coral assemblage at 34% cover, unusually high non-coral invertebrate cover (28.5%), and a photograph showing a crown-of-thorns starfish beside forceps - evidence of an active, deliberate removal rather than a chance sighting. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
19.8 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.9°C
+1.0°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
Bottom time
58 min
in at 15:05

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

4 of these 15 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

56789101112131415

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIEA52 is a protected submerged bank reef inside the lagoon at 20.0 m, surveyed 25 March 2015 and filed to Eagle Island — a label this rebuild disputes, since the site sits east of every Eagle Island station and inside the Three Brothers longitude range, was dived a week after Eagle Island work ended, and maps to the Three Brothers CRD page (e.g., Image 2).

General benthic features

The striking figure is neither: non-coral invertebrates hold 28.5% of the benthos, more than the entire algal budget, unresolved to taxon. Across 25 genera no taxon exceeds 37% of the coral — Porites 12.38% of the benthos, Acropora 5.85%, Pocillopora 3.98% — an unusually balanced mix (e.g., Image 1, Image 4).

The profile runs from an invertebrate-dominated shallow band at 13.7% coral and 55.3% invertebrates, through two coral-abundant mid-depth bands at 46.2% and 42.7% carrying 17 and 24 genera, to a single deep transect at 34.0% where Acropora drops out and Pachyseris takes 18% of the coral. A third shows a dead table colonized by a dozen live Acropora recruits.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 34.1% coral against 24.1% algae, 67th of 109 Chagos sites for cover and 102nd for algae, among the eight least algae-dominated reefs in the archipelago, with fleshy turf at just 3.0%, 105th of 109. The site has no multi-method row, so the transect figure is its only verified cover number. Coral cover: 34%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 24.1% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.

Stressors

Bleaching on the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column is 0.00%, 109th of 110 dives and the lowest of any site with a figure, both runs agreeing — yet one of the 26 frames shows a small intact bone-white colony among pigmented neighbors, so the reef should not be called unbleached. Another frame shows a crown-of-thorns starfish beside a stainless-steel bone-cutting forceps laid on the substrate, a deliberate removal rather than a chance encounter; one individual, no aggregation (e.g., Image 3).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)34.1
CoralNet38.1
In-house DINOv321.8
CoralSCOP edited39.1
Claude34.5

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2006. The most recent nearby survey is from 2006, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (34%) sits 7.1 points below the range of these surveys (41%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Sheppard et al. (2008)Great Chagos Bank200641% (5 surveys)4.70 kmHeatCRD database

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF