Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle and Chagos Archipelago

BIEA52, despite being filed under Eagle Island, sits close enough to Three Brothers that it likely belongs there instead. It carries a balanced, no-single-taxon-dominant coral assemblage at 34% cover, unusually high non-coral invertebrate cover (28.5%), and a photograph showing a crown-of-thorns starfish beside forceps - evidence of an active, deliberate removal rather than a chance sighting. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Eagle Island, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
4 of these 15 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BIEA52 is a protected submerged bank reef inside the lagoon at 20.0 m, surveyed 25 March 2015 and filed to Eagle Island — a label this rebuild disputes, since the site sits east of every Eagle Island station and inside the Three Brothers longitude range, was dived a week after Eagle Island work ended, and maps to the Three Brothers CRD page (e.g., Image 2).
The striking figure is neither: non-coral invertebrates hold 28.5% of the benthos, more than the entire algal budget, unresolved to taxon. Across 25 genera no taxon exceeds 37% of the coral — Porites 12.38% of the benthos, Acropora 5.85%, Pocillopora 3.98% — an unusually balanced mix (e.g., Image 1, Image 4).
The profile runs from an invertebrate-dominated shallow band at 13.7% coral and 55.3% invertebrates, through two coral-abundant mid-depth bands at 46.2% and 42.7% carrying 17 and 24 genera, to a single deep transect at 34.0% where Acropora drops out and Pachyseris takes 18% of the coral. A third shows a dead table colonized by a dozen live Acropora recruits.
Formal transects recorded 34.1% coral against 24.1% algae, 67th of 109 Chagos sites for cover and 102nd for algae, among the eight least algae-dominated reefs in the archipelago, with fleshy turf at just 3.0%, 105th of 109. The site has no multi-method row, so the transect figure is its only verified cover number. Coral cover: 34%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 24.1% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it.
Bleaching on the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column is 0.00%, 109th of 110 dives and the lowest of any site with a figure, both runs agreeing — yet one of the 26 frames shows a small intact bone-white colony among pigmented neighbors, so the reef should not be called unbleached. Another frame shows a crown-of-thorns starfish beside a stainless-steel bone-cutting forceps laid on the substrate, a deliberate removal rather than a chance encounter; one individual, no aggregation (e.g., Image 3).
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 34.1 |
| CoralNet | 38.1 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 21.8 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 39.1 |
| Claude | 34.5 |
Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2006. The most recent nearby survey is from 2006, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (34%) sits 7.1 points below the range of these surveys (41%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | Great Chagos Bank | 2006 | 41% (5 surveys) | 4.70 km | HeatCRD database |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.