Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Salomon / Blenheim / Speakers Bank and Chagos Archipelago

A back reef inside Salomon lagoon at 18 m in unusually warm water (30.8ยฐC), with 52% coral cover and a different coral in charge at every depth: Acropora, then Goniopora, then Porites, then a deep transect of 77% Montipora. Bleaching was in the worst fifth of Chagos, with bone-white colonies beside pigmented neighbors. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Six independent survey stations shown with the programโs logo โ click one to see how far it is from this site.
Nine other CRD dive sites within 5ย km shown in orange โ click a marker to open its page.
๐บ Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Salomon Atoll, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
2 of these 20 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BISA91 is a protected emergent back reef inside Salomon lagoon at 18.2 m, surveyed 24 April 2015 in 30.8 degrees C water, nearly a degree warmer than its neighbors.
Across 27 genera the site row looks unusually even, five genera between 7% and 10% of the benthos with no clear leader โ but that evenness is an averaging artifact, and it is the site's real finding: each depth stratum is dominated by a different genus. The shallowest is Acropora ground at 22.8% of the benthos, the next hands over entirely to Goniopora at 20.5%, the third to Porites at 20.3%, and the single deepest transect is 77% Montipora with only eight genera; 84% of the site's Montipora figure comes from that one transect and 79% of its Acropora from two. Only Lobophyllia is abundant across the whole profile.
Formal transects recorded 52.4% coral against 36.3% algae โ 21st of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 65th for algae โ with turf at 14.6% of the benthos and non-coral invertebrates very low at 2.7%. Image methods read 24 to 25 points below the transects (CoralNet 27.2%, Coralscapes 28.5%) and should not be averaged with them. Coral cover: 52%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 36.3% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 52.4% ยท CoralNet points 27.2% ยท Coralscapes masks 28.5% (18 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.
Bleaching on the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column is 12.37%, 24th of 110 dives, the worst fifth of the archipelago, and both runs agree. Here the photographs back the model: all 18 frames were reviewed and three show unambiguous colony-scale bleaching โ a bone-white branching colony beside a pigmented neighbor, a brilliant white massive colony among pigmented ones, and a large polyp-expanded colony pale over most of its living surface. One colony is tan across half its surface and vivid pink across the other with continuous polyp structure between, reading as a chromoprotein response; the rose-pink masses recurring here were logged as sponges by an earlier reviewer and may instead be Lobophyllia, an identification this rebuild offers but does not settle (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).
No crown-of-thorns or disease.
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 52.4 |
| CoralNet | 46.7 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 55.6 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 44.0 |
| Claude | 40.3 |
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lange et al. (2021) | 2006โ2020 | 1 station, 1.21 km | Records โ |
| MERMAID* | 2020 | 1 station, 4.91 km | Records โ |
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | 2006 | 1 station, 2.83 km | Records โ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015 | 3 stations, 3.87โ4.71 km | Records โ |
Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 17 records between 2006 and 2020. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 1.21 km away), went from 29% in 2006 to 12% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (52%) sits 9.9 points above the range of these surveys (9.9โ43%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lange et al. (2021) | Salomon Atoll | 2006โ2020 | 9.9โ43% (5 surveys) | 1.21 km | HeatCRD database |
| Sheppard et al. (2008) | Salomon | 2006 | 32% (5 surveys) | 2.83 km | HeatCRD database |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36014 | 2015 | 34% | 3.87 km | โ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36013 | 2015 | 28% | 4.18 km | โ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36016 | 2015 | 19% | 4.71 km | โ |
| MERMAID* | Salomon 219 | 2020 | 30% (4 surveys) | 4.91 km | MERMAID |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.