Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA91)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-24
Coordinates
-5.3396, 72.2633
Coral cover
57%
± 3.9% SE, n = 15 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
12%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
18
Site summary

A back reef on the windward side of Salomon lagoon (dived to 21.3 m; station CTD-cast midpoint 30.8°C), with 57% coral cover and a different coral in charge at every depth: Acropora, then Goniopora, then Porites, then a deep transect where Montipora makes up 77% of the coral. Published bleaching was 12%, with bone-white colonies beside pigmented neighbors. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
21.3 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.8°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.9–31.7°C
+1.7°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.9–31.7°C. Anderson's sampling-sheet note for the dive gives nearly 32°C (31.7°C) above a thermocline at about 6-7 m; the CTD cast is the station value shown.
Bottom time
64 min
in at 15:46

Five independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Nine other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

2 of the 18 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

25678911121314151617192023

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISA91 is a back reef inside Salomon lagoon, windward from its position on the east side of Salomon atoll relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds (leeward on Anderson's field sheet), surveyed 24 April 2015 on a dive to 21.3 m (station CTD-cast midpoint 30.8°C).

General benthic features

Across 28 genera the site average looks even, three genera at 11% to 12% of the benthos with no clear leader — but that evenness is an averaging artifact, and it is the site's real finding: each depth stratum is dominated by a different genus. The shallowest is Acropora ground at 23% of the benthos, the next hands over entirely to Goniopora at 21%, the third to Porites at 20%, and the single deepest transect is 26% Montipora (77% of its coral) with only nine genera; half of the site's Montipora figure comes from that one transect and 63% of its Acropora from two. Only Lobophyllia is abundant through D1–D3, and it is absent from the single D4 transect.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 12% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). In the photographs, three frames show unambiguous colony-scale bleaching — a bone-white branching colony beside a pigmented neighbor, a brilliant white massive colony among pigmented ones, and a large polyp-expanded colony pale over most of its living surface. One colony is tan across half its surface and vivid pink across the other with continuous polyp structure between, reading as a chromoprotein response; the rose-pink masses recurring here may be sponges or Lobophyllia; the frames do not settle which (e.g., Image 3, Image 4).

No crown-of-thorns starfish or disease signs appear in the photographs. Anderson's sampling sheet records 12 colonies sampled here at 4.8–20.2 m: 11 Pocillopora acuta by RFLP; one P. acuta by field call; the condition notes run from healthy to 100% bleached, with some partly dead colonies. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.1% cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Thriving Oceans surveyed a nearby station (SAL Fouquet Lagoon) in 2015, 2018, and 2021, 0.42 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Within 5 km, five independent stations recorded station-year means of 9.9–43% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2020; the nearest of these, Lange et al. (2021) at Salomon Atoll, 1.21 km away, read 9.9–43% between 2006 and 2020.

Other notes

Anderson's field sheet records the aspect (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'backreef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef). The aspect shown, 'windward', comes from the station's GPS position on the east side of Salomon atoll relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds (about 34° off the upwind direction; the reef-edge reading agrees), which takes precedence over slope facing, lagoon shelter, imagery, and field labels. Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Salomon atoll; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin on the lagoon-side back reef of the eastern island, consistent with the sheet.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)57.0
CoralNet46.7*n = 13 · SE 3.2
In-house DINOv355.6*n = 13 · SE 3.4
CoralSCOP edited44.0*n = 13 · SE 5.8
Claude40.3*n = 13 · SE 4.0

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 15.3 pp (40.3–55.6%) and read 1.4–16.7 pp below the in-water transect (57.0%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 13 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)2006–20201 station, 1.21 kmRecords ↓
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 2.83 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20153 stations, 3.87–4.71 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%15%30%45%60%200620132020Lange et al. (2021) 2006: 29%Lange et al. (2021) 2010: 43%Lange et al. (2021) 2016: 9.9%Lange et al. (2021) 2019: 14%Lange et al. (2021) 2020: 12%Sheppard et al. (2008) 2006: 32%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 19%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 28%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 34%LOF Global Reef Expedition 2015: 57%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)

Within 5 km, 5 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 13 records between 2006 and 2020. The one station surveyed in more than one year declined by 17 points between its first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 1.21 km away), went from 29% in 2006 to 12% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (57%) sits 14 points above the range of these station-year means up to 2 km away (9.9–43%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)Salomon Atoll2006–20209.9–43% (range of yearly means; 5 records)1.21 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-021-02184-w
Sheppard et al. (2008)Salomon200632% (5 records)2.83 kmdoi:10.3354/meps07436
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36014201534%3.87 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36013201528%4.18 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36016201519%4.71 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF
  3. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  4. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI