Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA106)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Survey date(s)
2015-04-29
Coordinates
-5.3442, 72.2039
Coral cover
47%
± 2.5% SE, n = 10 transects · Benthic surveys
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Site summary

A sheltered forereef outside Salomon lagoon (station CTD cast to 20.5 m) with a steady 47% coral cover and 28 genera: Acropora in the shallows, a Porites core through the middle depths, and plate-forming Pachyseris at the bottom. Anderson did not dive it, so no photographs exist and its condition is unknown. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

CTD station depth
20.5 m
no logged dive; no surveys were done beyond 35 m
Water temp. during survey
30.5°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.9–31.2°C
+1.4°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.9–31.2°C.

Six independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Seven other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

Site description

Setting

BISA106 is a protected, submerged fringing forereef outside Salomon lagoon (station CTD cast to 20.5 m), surveyed 29 April 2015.

General benthic features

Across 28 genera, Porites leads at 19% of the benthos, 41% of live coral, then Acropora 6.2% and Lobophyllia 4.9%, over a floor where coralline algae cover 22% of the benthos (57% of the algal cover), with almost no sediment-laden turf. Total cover is nearly flat down the profile — 44%, 52%, 45%, 53%, 36% — while the assemblage turns over completely: an Acropora-led shallow fringe, a Porites core through the middle three strata that peaks at 42% of the benthos and 79% of that stratum's coral, then a deep inversion where Acropora returns at 13%, Pachyseris jumps from 0.1% to 12% and only six genera remain. The free-living fungiids Herpolitha and Fungia, with Goniopora and Alveopora, read more sheltered than the forereef label implies.

Coral cover

Stressors

Condition cannot be assessed: Anderson did not dive here and no photographs exist, so there are no CoralNet or Coralscapes products and no observation of bleaching, disease, predation, crown-of-thorns, or fauna — unavailable, not zero. No mean bleaching value was published for this site, so it contributes nothing to any archipelago bleaching statistic, and the transect figure is its only cover number. The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 1.7% cyanobacteria and 0.2% recently dead coral; they carry no bleaching, disease, or crown-of-thorns field.

Comparisons with other data

Sannassy Pilly et al. (2024) surveyed a nearby station (Ile Passe), 0.21 km from the pin. Within 5 km, six independent stations recorded station-year means of 6.8–63% hard coral cover between 2006 and 2020; the nearest of these, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36018, 1.69 km away, read 22% in 2015.

Other notes

The transect record's value to the archive is reliability rather than extremity.

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)2006–20201 station, 3.23 kmRecords ↓
Sheppard et al. (2008)20061 station, 4.05 kmRecords ↓
Spalding et al. (2025)—1 station, 1.53 kmRecords ↓
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20154 stations, 1.69–3.95 kmRecords ↓
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%17%34%51%68%200620132020Lange et al. (2021) 2006: 48%Lange et al. (2021) 2010: 63%Lange et al. (2021) 2018: 6.8%Lange et al. (2021) 2019: 23%Lange et al. (2021) 2020: 21%Sheppard et al. (2008) 2006: 32%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 22%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 22%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 28%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 28%LOF Global Reef Expedition 2015: 47%Year-averaged across all programs: illustrative only; the programs differ in stations and method, so no trend is claimed (6 years)

Within 5 km, 6 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 14 records between 2006 and 2020. The one station surveyed in more than one year declined by 27 points between its first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 3.23 km away), went from 48% in 2006 to 21% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (47%) sits 25 points above the one survey station up to 2 km away (22%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. One further row in the table has no survey date, so it is listed but not part of this summary.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)Salomon Atoll2006–20206.8–63% (range of yearly means; 5 records)3.23 kmdoi:10.1007/s00338-021-02184-w
Sheppard et al. (2008)Salomon200632% (5 records)4.05 kmdoi:10.3354/meps07436
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36018201522%1.69 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36015201528%2.27 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36017201522%2.69 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36013201528%3.95 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930
Spalding et al. (2025)Salomon - Boddam Lagoon (N, 1-4 m)pre-bleaching baseline65%1.53 km—

Data & links

Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF
  2. Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
  3. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  4. Sannassy Pilly S, Roche RC, Richardson LE, Turner JR (2024). Depth variation in benthic community response to repeated marine heatwaves on remote Central Indian Ocean reefs. Royal Society Open Science 11:231246. DOI
  5. Spalding M, Bourasseau M, et al. (2025). Coral bleaching and mortality in the Chagos Archipelago, 2024. British Indian Ocean Territory Administration report (gray literature). PDF
  6. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI