Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank / Great Chagos Bank North and Chagos Archipelago

A submerged bank reef at 23 m inside the Nelson Island lagoon, dominated by Acropora with few other genera and heavy fleshy turf, at 32% coral cover. Photos show more stark white and pale colonies than its modest 5% published bleaching figure suggests, and a whitetip reef shark and dogtooth tuna were seen. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Four independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
One other CRD dive site within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Nelson Island, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
10 of these 26 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BINI79 is a protected submerged bank reef inside the Nelson Island lagoon at 23.4 m, surveyed 20 April 2015 (e.g., Image 7, Image 28).
Genus richness is in the bottom decile at 12 genera, 102nd of 109, Acropora holding 59% of all coral and the top five genera 97% of it. Cover peaks sharply at the middle station, 43.6% against 26.5% shallow and 24.5% deep, and at the deepest transect Acropora falls to a third of its mid-depth value while Porites nearly catches it and bare substrate reaches 30%.
Formal transects recorded 31.5% coral against 42.7% algae — 73rd of 109 Chagos sites for cover — and the algal budget is soft rather than cemented: fleshy turf takes 19.8% of the benthos, the 5th-highest turf value of the 109 sites, against only 9.4% coralline algae, with 16.3% bare substrate. The image methods recover roughly a third of the transect cover — CoralNet 10.8%, Coralscapes 11.3% against 31.5%. Coral cover: 32%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 42.7% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 31.5% · CoralNet points 10.8% · Coralscapes masks 11.3% (20 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.
Published bleaching is 5.0%, below median at 70th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column — and the photographs do not sit comfortably with it: six frames show stark white or strongly pale colonies beside pigmented neighbors, including two large tables white at the margins with fouled brown centers (e.g., Image 4, Image 9, Image 16, Image 20, Image 22, Image 23).
Those are logged as ambiguous, since a single still cannot separate partial bleaching from a recently dead skeleton.
A whitetip reef shark, dogtooth tuna, and one cushion star were recorded; no crown-of-thorns or disease (e.g., Image 24, Image 27).
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 31.5 |
| CoralNet | 19.4 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 21.6 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 21.2 |
| Claude | 17.9 |
Within 5 km, 4 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (32%) sits 14.3 points above the range of these surveys (3.4–17%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36026 | 2015 | 12% | 0.41 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36024 | 2015 | 17% | 1.58 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36025 | 2015 | 3.4% | 1.71 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36027 | 2015 | 15% | 4.83 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.