Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA107)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation โ€” Global Reef Expedition
โฌ‡ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-30
Coordinates
-5.3102, 72.2689
Coral cover
25%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
7.1%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021โ€“2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
47
Site summary

A deep (35 m) exposed forereef outside Salomon atoll paved with the thickest crust of pink coralline algae of any Chagos site, with Acropora and Stylophora at 25% cover. The most actionable find was an abandoned fishing net draped across live coral inside the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) no-take marine protected area; three sharks and a spiny lobster were also seen. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.8 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.3ยฐC
+0.2ยฐC vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1ยฐC)
Bottom time
57 min
in at 07:20

Five independent survey stations shown with the programโ€™s logo โ€” click one to see how far it is from this site.

Eight other CRD dive sites within 5ย km shown in orange โ€” click a marker to open its page.

3 of these 47 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

46789101113141516171820212223242526272930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISA107 is a deep exposed emergent forereef outside Salomon atoll at 34.75 m, surveyed 30 April 2015.

General benthic features

Across 25 genera Acropora holds 41% of the coral and Stylophora an unusually high 15%, while Porites is nearly absent at 4%. Cover more than doubles down the profile, 16.4% to 20.4% to 37.0%, Millepora confined to the shallowest transect, Stylophora peaking at the middle one, and Acropora surging to 55% of the coral at the deepest โ€” yet algae outweighs coral at every depth.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 24.6% coral against 65.4% algae โ€” 85th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 2nd of 109 for algae โ€” but that is not an overgrowth story: coralline algae alone holds 34.9% of the benthos, the highest such value of any of the 109 sites, against only 8.6% fleshy turf, so the dominant surface is cemented pink pavement rather than weed (e.g., Image 3).

Image methods recover about half the transect cover (CoralNet 12.5%, Coralscapes 12.8%) and rest on just 12 frames from a fun dive. Coral cover: 25%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 65.4% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 24.6% ยท CoralNet points 12.5% ยท Coralscapes masks 12.8% (12 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.

Stressors

Published bleaching is 7.1%, at the archipelago median, 50th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column; no colony in the 20 frames reviewed shows unambiguous white-against-pigmented contrast, and a pale coralline surface covering a third of the benthos makes any color-based call unreliable here. The most actionable observation is an abandoned fishing net photographed draped across live coral and pavement inside the BIOT no-take MPA. No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.

Fish and other fauna

Three shark encounters and a spiny lobster were also recorded (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).

Comparisons with other data

No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. โš  The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. โš  SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)24.6
CoralNet18.0
In-house DINOv320.6
CoralSCOP edited21.7
Claude18.5

Independent surveys nearby

Data availability near this site
Agency / programYear(s)Stations / distanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)2006โ€“20201 station, 4.53 kmRecords โ†“
MERMAID*20201 station, 4.35 kmRecords โ†“
XL Catlin Seaview Survey20153 stations, 1.99โ€“4.39 kmRecords โ†“
Hard coral cover over time — this site and every independent station within 5 km. Programs are shown separately because they use different methods at different stations; the lines are not one comparable series.
0%12%24%36%48%200620132020Lange et al. (2021) 2006: 29%Lange et al. (2021) 2010: 43%Lange et al. (2021) 2016: 9.9%Lange et al. (2021) 2019: 14%Lange et al. (2021) 2020: 12%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 17%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 19%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 28%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 33%XL Catlin Seaview Survey 2015: 34%MERMAID* 2020: 30%Dr. Coral (CRD) 2015: 25%Year-averaged across all programs: no detectable trend (-1.42 pp per year, not separable from zero; 6 years)
Lange et al. (2021) XL Catlin Seaview Survey MERMAID* Dr. Coral (CRD)Year-average (no detectable trend)

Within 5 km, 5 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 12 records between 2006 and 2020. Of the 1 station surveyed in more than one year, 1 declined between their first and latest surveys. The longest record, Salomon Atoll (Lange et al. 2021, 4.53 km away), went from 29% in 2006 to 12% in 2020. The most recent nearby survey is from 2020, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (25%) sits within the range of these surveys (9.9โ€“43%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.

Collected by other programs using different methods (MERMAID is a data platform: each MERMAID row names the organization that did the survey, and its method is in the row's hover text; the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation. *Conducted by citizen scientists), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
Lange et al. (2021)Salomon Atoll2006โ€“20209.9โ€“43% (5 surveys)4.53 kmHeatCRD database
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36014201534%1.99 kmโ€”
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36016201519%2.26 kmโ€”
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36013201528%4.39 kmโ€”
MERMAID*Salomon 219202030% (4 surveys)4.35 kmMERMAID

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF