Chagos Archipelago - Salomon / Blenheim / Speakers Bank
Regional summary of 25 dive sites. Figures are averages across the sites that report them (n = sites with a value); each site's own page has its individual values. Part of the Chagos Archipelago overview.
Northern Chagos lagoon, bank, and forereef sites at Salomon, Blenheim, and Speakers Bank, dived in 2015, include multi-layered canopies of table corals and the archipelago's most coral-diverse site, with 37 genera. Salomon's exposed forereefs were among the most heavily bleached in Chagos.
Heat stress
sea surface temperature (SST) (left axis)DHW under 2DHW 2–3DHW 3–5DHW 5–8DHW 8–10DHW over 10 (🔥 above 12)
Daily SST (line) and weekly maximum Degree Heating Weeks (bars), Jan 2023–Oct 2026, NOAA Coral Reef Watch 5-km Chagos Archipelago, UK virtual station. Dashed line: bleaching threshold (maximum monthly mean 29.0°C + 1°C). DHW ≥ 4: bleaching likely; ≥ 8: severe bleaching and mortality likely. A bar is drawn only where DHW exceeds zero, so a stretch with no bar is accumulated heat stress of zero, not missing data — the SST line runs the full period.
Long-term record: 3 years from 1985 through 2025 reached 8 or more °C-weeks at NOAA’s Chagos Archipelago, UK station. Download the annual DHW data (CSV).
25 sites in this region — click a marker to open that site.
Regional setting
Salomon and Blenheim Reef are two of the five true atolls that Spalding et al. (2001) recognize in the Chagos Archipelago, and Speakers Bank is one of its submerged banks. Salomon, like the other northern atolls, has only small islands scattered along its rim, and the atlas pictures a small coral cay sitting on its reef flat. It is also the atoll the authors single out for human impact. As of 2001 the outer islands had no residents, but visiting yachts were thought to be causing local anchor damage and sewage pollution in Salomon's enclosed lagoon. A 1996 photograph of shallow Salomon lagoon reefs is captioned as showing reefs later devastated by the 1998 bleaching. Across the archipelago, coral had typically covered 50–80% of seaward and lagoon slopes down to about 40 m before 1998, and seaward coral loss in that event averaged an estimated 80–85%. The Chagos reefs hold some 220 scleractinian species, among the richest coral faunas in the Indian Ocean, including Ctenella chagius, a coral that may occur only here apart from a single reported sighting at Mauritius. Spalding et al. (2001) estimate about 3,770 km² of reef across the whole archipelago, and Souter et al. (2021), using a newer map, give 2,731 km² for the Chagos ecoregion.
Reefs in the Chagos showed encouraging recovery in the years after 1998, according to Wilkinson's (2006) summary of the 2004 status report. Souter et al. (2021) trace coral cover in the Chagos subregion rising until about 2015 and falling again after the 2016 bleaching, an event that killed more than 42% of living hard coral across South Asia. Region-wide, smaller and more localized bleaching between 2017 and 2019 prolonged the decline, and algal cover crept up from about 10% before 2008 to 14% by 2018. Because the Chagos atolls combine restricted access with the region's largest marine protected area (MPA), Souter et al. (2021) rank them among the South Asian reefs under least human pressure and name bleaching as the chief threat. Fishing was not absent, though: as of 2001, Spalding et al. reported illegal fishing for sharks and sea cucumbers, countered by a British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) fisheries protection vessel.
Overview
This unit pools 25 stations in three neighboring northern survey areas dived between 22 April and 3 May 2015: the Blenheim forereefs, the lagoon and outer forereefs of Salomon atoll, and the lagoon and bank reefs of Speakers Bank. Logged maximum depths ran from 15.5 m at BISA97 to 31.1 m on the Blenheim forereef at BIBL82 (BISA98 and BISA106 have station CTD casts only). Speakers Bank reefs are dominated by Acropora tables. Acropora makes up 80% of the coral at BISP101, and at BISP96 overlapping tables form a multi-layered canopy. Salomon's lagoon reefs are often not Acropora reefs at all. Porites, Lobophyllia, and Goniopora lead at BISA105, and Acropora is almost absent at BISA94. At BISA91 the lead passes with depth from Acropora through Goniopora and Porites to a deep transect of 77% Montipora.
Cover ranged from 26% on the BISA92 wall, where sponges, sea squirts, meter-wide sea fans, and black wire corals outweigh the coral, to 82% at BISP96, with BISA107 (25%) at the low end beside BISA92 and BISA98 at 71% from a single transect. Coral diversity is high: BIBL87 carries 37 genera, and BISA93 carries 34. The Chagos-endemic Ctenella was recorded at BISA93, BISA104, BISP90, BISP95, BISP96, and BISP115. At Blenheim, fleshy turf covers 22% of the benthos at BIBL86, and fire coral (Millepora) is its leading coral taxon. BISP96 also has 12% algal cover.
The Salomon forereefs carried published bleaching of 34% at BISA84, 31% at BISA104, 24% at BISA103, and 19% at BISA102 (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1), with stark-white colonies beside pigmented neighbors. Published values at Speakers Bank ran from 2.1% at BISP90 to 9.2% at BISP89, but Anderson's dive notes and sampling sheets record heavy bleaching there as well: all four Seriatopora hystrix sampled at BISP90 were 95-100% bleached, 90%-bleached Pocillopora verrucosa were very common at 20 m at BISP95, and most pocilloporids at BISP100 were bleached, diseased, or partly dead. In the Salomon lagoon, Anderson's notes describe most corals at 10-20 m as bleached or bleaching at BISA105 (published 5.6%) and many bleached corals in the shallows at BISA94 (2.8%); at Blenheim, published values near 10% sit beside the notes that most corals were bleaching at BIBL86, particularly fire coral, and that at least half the colonies had bleached at BIBL87. BISP115 has no published figure; its photographs show several bleached colonies, and three of the five pocilloporids Anderson sampled were 90-100% bleached, though the dive note judged the bleaching not severe in terms of percentage of colonies. At BISA107 an abandoned fishing net was photographed draped across live coral inside the no-take marine protected area. No crown-of-thorns was reported at the sites that recorded its absence, but Anderson's sampling sheet records diseased or possibly diseased Pocillopora colonies among those sampled at BIBL83, BISP89, BISP96, BISP100, and BISP101. Wildlife included a hawksbill turtle resting at BIBL83, a silvertip-type shark and two giant morays at BISA102, and three sharks and a spiny lobster at BISA107.
Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA84): Published bleaching 34%; white branching and plating colonies beside pigmented neighbors in five to six of the 10 frames, and all seven colonies Anderson sampled here were partly or fully bleached. No crown-of-thorns or disease signs in the photographs.
Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA93): Published bleaching 12%; stark-white plating and massive colonies beside pigmented neighbors in many of the photographs, including a massive colony white across half its surface. No crown-of-thorns, disease band, or fresh predation scar.
Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA92): Published bleaching 9.1%; pale-to-white branching colonies at the reef top; stark-white encrusting and massive colonies on the wall; and two large sea anemones with stark white tentacles, described as genuine thermal stress. No crown-of-thorns or disease.
Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA91): Published bleaching 12%; three frames show unambiguous colony-scale bleaching, including a bone-white branching colony and a brilliant white massive colony. No crown-of-thorns or disease.
Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA88): Published bleaching 12%; several sharply white colonies, and the condition of the 13 colonies Anderson sampled ran from healthy to 100% bleached. No crown-of-thorns or disease in the 19 photographs.
Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA97): Published bleaching 8.8%; branching colonies and one large table are white in the photographs, and Anderson's notes record very bad bleaching in P. verrucosa, with almost all colonies at the site badly bleached.
Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP115): No published bleaching figure; bleached colonies in several frames, including a white table on a turf-covered dead one, and three of the five pocilloporids Anderson sampled were 90-100% bleached, though the note judged the bleaching not severe in terms of percentage of colonies. No disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns seen in the photographs.
Chagos Archipelago - Blenheim (BIBL86): Published bleaching 10%; extensive white branching thickets, including the fire coral that Anderson's dive notes record as bleaching. No crown-of-thorns or disease in the 27 photographs.
Chagos Archipelago - Blenheim (BIBL82): Bleaching 7.8%, limited mostly to branching Acropora and Pocillopora; massive and meandroid corals fully pigmented.
Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP95): Published bleaching 6.5%; compact branching colonies partly bleached in the photographs, and Anderson's notes record 90%-bleached Pocillopora verrucosa as very common at 20 m (three of the four pocilloporids sampled were bleached or bleaching).
Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP100): Published bleaching 4.8%; one compact branching colony with many white branch ends in the photographs, and Anderson's notes record most pocilloporids at the site bleached, diseased, or partly dead.
Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP96): Published bleaching 4.2%; the table canopy is largely pigmented, with two small wholly white colonies beneath the tables, and Anderson's notes record badly bleached colonies within several meters of a healthy colony sampled.
Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP101): Published bleaching 7.1%; one compact field of pale lavender-to-white branching colonies among pigmented tables; Anderson's notes record many dead tables where the reef was scoured at about 15 m, and three of the four pocilloporids sampled were sickly or partly dead, possibly from disease.
Coral cover over time (pooled)
One point per year: the mean of every hard coral cover value available for this region that year — Anderson’s own dives and every independent survey station within 5 km of them. The vertical bar is the full range behind that mean. Different programs use different methods at different stations, so this is a regional summary, not a single comparable series. Years resting on fewer than three values are drawn as smaller points (2010, 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020). Non-CRD/LOF points are from XL Catlin Seaview Survey (University of Queensland), Sheppard et al. (2008), and Lange et al. (2021). Marker shape: Anderson’s own dives, other organizations’ surveys, a mix of both, that year, the year includes Global Reef Expedition dives made with the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation (CRD+LOF data).Sites in this region (25)
11 of these 17 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
CoralSCOP (SAM-based mask-sum), edited photos
33%
±8.0
18
11 of these 18 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
Claude (Anthropic), blind point count
30%
±11
18
11 of these 18 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
In-house DINOv3 point classifier
35%
±12
18
11 of these 18 values rest on 10–19 photographs (*)
In-water diver transect (line/point intercept)
45%
±13
22
—
The mean is an UNWEIGHTED mean of the dive site values — each dive site counts once, whatever its photo count — which is the convention of the published tables and of every other figure on this page. Each value is the one printed on that dive site's own page; a page that prints no value for a method (fewer than 10 photographs) is left out of that method's mean.
This table pools only the 22 dive sites in this unit that have a method comparison; the table for all 101 dive sites is on the Chagos Archipelago page.
Closest to the reference
Over the dive sites where an independent reference exists, CoralNet automated point classifier sits closest to it — a mean absolute deviation of 12.8 pp across 17 dive sites, then Claude (Anthropic), blind point count 14.7 pp (n=17). Not in this ranking: Coralscapes v1, Coralscapes v2, and CoralSCOP (edited), which measure coral area rather than points; DINOv3, which counts points over a different denominator; Manual point count, which is not comparable with this reference. A mean absolute deviation is not an accuracy score: a model with a consistent offset is correctable, while one with the same deviation scattered in both directions is not.
n under each value is the number of photographs that method scored at that dive site. ⚠ marks a cell that is not an independent check. * marks a value resting on only 10–19 photographs, which is less certain.
Reference: IN-WATER DIVER TRANSECT, independent of the imagery (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans 7:1). Denominator: line/point intercept along the transect; not a photo-point denominator. Source: the mean of all of each station's transects (Living Oceans Foundation per-transect benthic data); the published station values, which weight each depth equally, are in Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans 7:1, suppl. S1 (formal 38.7% cover / 30.5% bleaching, tourist-diver 35.1% / 31.8%) For all 104 dive sites in the comparison: ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea. Those are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is the mean of all of each station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data.
Nearby external survey stations
26 independent survey records within 5 km of a site in this region (each record counted once; 22 lines, and a line that pools several records says how many).
Show all 26 records
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2006): 29% hard coral cover, 0.97 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA103)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2006): 48% hard coral cover, 0.48 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA98)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2010): 43% hard coral cover, 0.97 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA103)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2010): 63% hard coral cover, 0.48 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA98)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2016): 9.9% hard coral cover, 0.97 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA103)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2018): 6.8% hard coral cover, 0.48 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA98)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2019): 14% hard coral cover, 0.97 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA103)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2019): 23% hard coral cover, 0.48 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA98)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2020): 12% hard coral cover, 0.97 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA103)
Lange et al. (2021) — Salomon Atoll (2020): 21% hard coral cover, 0.48 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA98)
Sheppard et al. (2008) — Salomon (2006): 32% hard coral cover, 1.27 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA88) (5 records)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36013 (2015): 28% hard coral cover, 0.82 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA84)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36014 (2015): 34% hard coral cover, 1.14 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA93)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36015 (2015): 28% hard coral cover, 0.66 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA94)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36016 (2015): 19% hard coral cover, 0.66 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA93)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36017 (2015): 22% hard coral cover, 0.43 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA102)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36018 (2015): 22% hard coral cover, 1.25 km from Chagos Archipelago - Salomons Island (BISA98)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36019 (2015): 29% hard coral cover, 0.42 km from Chagos Archipelago - Blenheim (BIBL82)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36020 (2015): 17% hard coral cover, 0.90 km from Chagos Archipelago - Blenheim (BIBL83)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36021 (2015): 21% hard coral cover, 2.93 km from Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP95)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36022 (2015): 30% hard coral cover, 1.99 km from Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP95)
XL Catlin Seaview Survey — transect 36023 (2015): 20% hard coral cover, 4.71 km from Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP95)
Spalding MD, et al. (2001) World Atlas of Coral Reefs. University of California Press, Berkeley. [PDF]
Wilkinson C (2006) Status of coral reefs of the world: summary of threats and remedial action. In: Côté IM, Reynolds JD (eds) Coral Reef Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [PDF]
Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
Sheppard C, Harris A, Sheppard A (2008). Archipelago-wide coral recovery patterns since 1998 in the Chagos Archipelago, central Indian Ocean. Marine Ecology Progress Series 362:109-117. PDF
Lange ID, Benkwitt CE, McDevitt-Irwin JM, Tietjen KL, Taylor B, Chinkin M, et al. (2021). Wave exposure shapes reef community composition and recovery trajectories at a remote coral atoll. Coral Reefs 40:1819-1829. PDF