Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank (BIVB109)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-30
Coordinates
-5.5476, 72.2188
Coral cover
48%
± 5.4% SE, n = 15 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
8.7%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
33
Site summary

A submerged bank reef on isolated Victory Bank (dived to 16.4 m), where fire coral (Millepora) leads the coral at over a third, ahead of Acropora and Porites (about a sixth each), over pink coralline pavement. One depth stratum holds almost all the fire coral and 24 of the site's 26 genera, including the endemic Ctenella chagius, and nurse sharks were photographed several times. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
16.4 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.0°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.6–30.5°C
+1.0°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.6–30.5°C.
Bottom time
51 min
in at 12:23

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

6 of the 33 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

145689101112131416171921222325262728313233353637

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIVB109 is a submerged bank reef on Victory Bank, an isolated offshore bank at the north of the archipelago, surveyed 30 April 2015 on a dive to 16.4 m.

General benthic features

Across 26 genera the hydrocoral Millepora leads at 36% of the coral, ahead of Acropora (18%) and Porites (17%). The one depth stratum that holds almost all the Millepora (10 transects; see Coral cover) also carries 24 of the site's 26 genera, including the Chagos endemic Ctenella chagius; the deepest stratum, a single transect, is led by Platygyra, with Porites and Goniastrea next.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 8.7%, and Anderson's field notes from the dive support it: most of the reef was dominated by Millepora, "much of which was bleached," and diseased Pocillopora colonies were common at the site. In the photographs, white branching, knobby, massive, and table colonies stand beside pigmented neighbors (e.g., Image 2, Image 7, Image 15, Image 18).

Anderson's sampling sheet records four pocilloporid colonies sampled here for a collaborator (species by field call): Pocillopora sp. ChJo281 (16.2 m, healthy, dark pigmentation), ChJo282 (15.5 m, 80% dead, 20% dying), ChJo283 (16.0 m, 50% diseased), and ChJo284 (14.3 m, large, healthy). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.1% recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Nurse sharks were photographed several times (e.g., Image 3, Image 20), and no crown-of-thorns was seen; Anderson's sheet also notes a sailfish seen from the boat.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Other notes

Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) leaves the reef type and aspect blank, so no aspect is printed; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Victory Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows only open water over the submerged bank at the pin, so the aspect cannot be checked from imagery.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)47.6
CoralNet35.0n = 32 · SE 2.1
In-house DINOv339.0n = 33 · SE 2.4
CoralSCOP edited24.9n = 33 · SE 3.2
Claude35.0n = 33 · SE 2.4

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 14.1 pp (24.9–39.0%) and read 8.6–22.7 pp below the in-water transect (47.6%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.