Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank (BIVB108)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-30
Coordinates
-5.5265, 72.2265
Coral cover
46%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
10.7%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
19
Site summary

A sheltered Victory Bank reef at 26.5 m where coral cover nearly doubles below the silty shallows, reaching about 54% deeper down under Acropora dominance, with 28 genera including the Chagos-endemic Ctenella chagius. Bleaching is conspicuous: at least five of 15 frames show chalk-white tables beside fully pigmented neighbors. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
24.6 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.2°C
+1.2°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
Bottom time
59 min
in at 10:13

Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of these 19 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

5678911121316181920212223

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIVB108 is a protected submerged lagoon-side reef at Victory Bank, 26.5 m, surveyed 30 April 2015 — the published reef-type cell is blank, so no class is asserted.

General benthic features

Twenty-eight genera were recorded, 36th of 109, with Acropora holding 41% of all coral, Porites 17%, and the archipelago's own Ctenella chagius and the blue octocoral Heliopora in the tail (e.g., Image 1).

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 45.7% coral against 43.8% algae, 34th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, and the algal budget is turf-led rather than coralline: fleshy turf 13.9% of benthos against coralline algae at 11.9%. Cover nearly doubles down the profile, from 29.5% at the shallowest stratum — where Acropora, Pocillopora, and Porites are nearly co-dominant over turf-and-sediment ground — to 54.1% and 53.4% deeper, where Acropora takes 42-47% of the coral and turf-plus-sediment falls from 15.5% to under half a percent. The image methods read some 27 points below the transects (CoralNet 18.9%, Coralscapes 19.1%) and rest on only three scored frames, so they are fragile and should not be averaged in. Coral cover: 46%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 43.8% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 45.7% · CoralNet points 18.9% · Coralscapes masks 19.1% (3 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.

Stressors

Published bleaching is 10.7%, 25th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column — and the photographs suggest it is conservative, at least five of 15 frames carrying wholly chalk-white tables beside fully pigmented neighbors; an independent point recount also runs higher, at 12.8% (e.g., Image 2, Image 3, Image 4).

No disease, predation, or crown-of-thorns was seen.

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)45.7
CoralNet25.1
In-house DINOv323.9
CoralSCOP edited28.2
Claude11.7

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.