Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank / Great Chagos Bank North and Chagos Archipelago

A submerged bank reef on Victory Bank (dived to 24.6 m) where coral cover nearly doubles below the silty shallows, reaching about 54% deeper down under Acropora dominance, with 29 genera including the Chagos-endemic Ctenella chagius. Bleaching is conspicuous: at least five of 15 frames show chalk-white tables beside fully pigmented neighbors. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Victory Bank, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
4 of the 15 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BIVB108 is a submerged bank reef at Victory Bank, surveyed 30 April 2015 on a dive to 24.6 m (see Dive record below).
Twenty-nine genera were recorded, with Acropora holding 41% of all coral, Porites 15%, and the archipelago's own Ctenella chagius and the blue octocoral Heliopora in the tail (e.g., Image 1).
Published bleaching is 11% — and the photographs suggest it is conservative, at least five of 15 frames carrying wholly chalk-white tables beside fully pigmented neighbors (e.g., Image 2, Image 3, Image 4).
No crown-of-thorns was seen in the photographs. Anderson's field notes from this dive record most pocilloporids as bleaching, bleached, or diseased, much of the reef above 20 m bleaching, and bleached colonies being smothered by algae and cyanobacteria (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.2% recently dead coral.
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
Anderson's morning dive on 30 April 2015 entered the water at 10:13 and lasted 59 minutes, to a maximum depth of 24.6 m (the field sheet); the notes describe murky water and a reef in bad shape, Seriatopora only below 20 m and quite rare, no P. acuta or P. damicornis, P. verrucosa common at all depths, and the first P. eydouxi seen in many dives, an enormous colony. Anderson sampled three Seriatopora colonies: S. hystrix ChSe153 (collected 10:17 at 24.6 m; small, 100% bleached, green fluorescence, partly smothered by algae), Seriatopora sp. ChSe154 (10:27, 20.7 m; potentially healthy, yellow-green fluorescence, intermediate between S. hystrix and S. aculeata), and S. hystrix ChSe155 (10:32, 20.7 m; 100% bleached, being overgrown by cyanobacteria, possibly dead). For a collaborator Anderson also sampled four pocilloporids (species by field call): Pocillopora verrucosa ChJo277 (10:42, 16.0 m; more than 90% bleached; most colonies were bleached) and ChJo278 (10:52, 14.7 m; more than 95% bleached, common at 15 m), Pocillopora eydouxi ChJo279 (10:59, 11.6 m; healthy, the only one seen), and Pocillopora sp. ChJo280 (11:05, 10.5 m; more than 95% bleached, with many bleached colonies nearby). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).
Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) leaves the reef type and aspect blank, so no aspect is printed; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Victory Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows only open water over the submerged bank at the pin, so the aspect cannot be checked from imagery.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 47.4 | |
| CoralNet | 25.1* | n = 10 · SE 2.4 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 23.9* | n = 11 · SE 4.3 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 28.2* | n = 11 · SE 5.7 |
| Claude | 11.7* | n = 11 · SE 4.5 |
The four computer-vision methods disagree by 16.5 pp (11.7–28.2%) and read 19.2–35.7 pp below the in-water transect (47.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
*Based on only 10 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain. (CoralNet)
*Based on only 11 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain. (In-house DINOv3, CoralSCOP edited, Claude)
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.