Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Victory Bank (BIVB108)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-30
Coordinates
-5.5265, 72.2265
Coral cover
47%
± 4.4% SE, n = 15 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
11%
Observations
bleachingdiseasealgal overgrowth
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
15
Site summary

A submerged bank reef on Victory Bank (dived to 24.6 m) where coral cover nearly doubles below the silty shallows, reaching about 54% deeper down under Acropora dominance, with 29 genera including the Chagos-endemic Ctenella chagius. Bleaching is conspicuous: at least five of 15 frames show chalk-white tables beside fully pigmented neighbors. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
24.6 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.2°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 30.1–30.3°C
+1.2°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.0°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 30.1–30.3°C.
Bottom time
59 min
in at 10:13

Three other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of the 15 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

56789111213161819

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIVB108 is a submerged bank reef at Victory Bank, surveyed 30 April 2015 on a dive to 24.6 m (see Dive record below).

General benthic features

Twenty-nine genera were recorded, with Acropora holding 41% of all coral, Porites 15%, and the archipelago's own Ctenella chagius and the blue octocoral Heliopora in the tail (e.g., Image 1).

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 11% — and the photographs suggest it is conservative, at least five of 15 frames carrying wholly chalk-white tables beside fully pigmented neighbors (e.g., Image 2, Image 3, Image 4).

No crown-of-thorns was seen in the photographs. Anderson's field notes from this dive record most pocilloporids as bleaching, bleached, or diseased, much of the reef above 20 m bleaching, and bleached colonies being smothered by algae and cyanobacteria (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded no cyanobacteria and 0.2% recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's morning dive on 30 April 2015 entered the water at 10:13 and lasted 59 minutes, to a maximum depth of 24.6 m (the field sheet); the notes describe murky water and a reef in bad shape, Seriatopora only below 20 m and quite rare, no P. acuta or P. damicornis, P. verrucosa common at all depths, and the first P. eydouxi seen in many dives, an enormous colony. Anderson sampled three Seriatopora colonies: S. hystrix ChSe153 (collected 10:17 at 24.6 m; small, 100% bleached, green fluorescence, partly smothered by algae), Seriatopora sp. ChSe154 (10:27, 20.7 m; potentially healthy, yellow-green fluorescence, intermediate between S. hystrix and S. aculeata), and S. hystrix ChSe155 (10:32, 20.7 m; 100% bleached, being overgrown by cyanobacteria, possibly dead). For a collaborator Anderson also sampled four pocilloporids (species by field call): Pocillopora verrucosa ChJo277 (10:42, 16.0 m; more than 90% bleached; most colonies were bleached) and ChJo278 (10:52, 14.7 m; more than 95% bleached, common at 15 m), Pocillopora eydouxi ChJo279 (10:59, 11.6 m; healthy, the only one seen), and Pocillopora sp. ChJo280 (11:05, 10.5 m; more than 95% bleached, with many bleached colonies nearby). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) leaves the reef type and aspect blank, so no aspect is printed; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Victory Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows only open water over the submerged bank at the pin, so the aspect cannot be checked from imagery.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)47.4
CoralNet25.1*n = 10 · SE 2.4
In-house DINOv323.9*n = 11 · SE 4.3
CoralSCOP edited28.2*n = 11 · SE 5.7
Claude11.7*n = 11 · SE 4.5

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 16.5 pp (11.7–28.2%) and read 19.2–35.7 pp below the in-water transect (47.4%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 10 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain. (CoralNet)

*Based on only 11 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain. (In-house DINOv3, CoralSCOP edited, Claude)

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.