Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB46)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-23
Coordinates
-6.0961, 71.5143
Coral cover
26%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
2.0%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
29
Site summary

Sitting at 27 m in the Three Brothers lagoon, BITB46 has the lowest coral cover of its group (25.8%), mostly Porites, spread over one of the thickest pink coralline crusts in Chagos (29.1% of the bottom, 4th of 109 sites), the sign of a well-grazed pavement and not a weedy reef. Gray and whitetip reef sharks, schooling surgeonfish and fusiliers, a cloud of baitfish, and a giant clam make the fish life a real highlight. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
27.3 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.0°C
+1.1°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
Bottom time
60 min
in at 15:06

Five other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

28 of these 29 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

15

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB46 is a protected submerged bank reef inside the Three Brothers lagoon at 27 m, surveyed 23 March 2015, and it is the low-cover site of its group: 25.8% coral against 55.3% algae, 84th of 109 Chagos sites for cover and 13th for algae (e.g., Image 17, Image 23, Image 30, Image 33).

General benthic features

But algae here means something specific — crustose coralline algae alone is 29.1% of the benthos, the 4th-highest value of all 109 sites, so more than half the algal budget is hard pink-mauve pavement rather than fleshy weed, and the photographs show a well-grazed crust binding rubble and dead framework, not a degraded weedy reef (e.g., Image 1, Image 8, Image 10, Image 12, Image 22, Image 24).

Across 22 genera, 69th of 109, Porites dominates at 11.35% of the benthos, 44% of every coral point and nearly three times the next genus.

Coral cover

The two strata differ more sharply than anywhere else in this group: cover more than halves from 35.1% to 16.5% while Acropora collapses 95% from 7.36% of the benthos to 0.40% and Porites comes to hold 58% of the deep stratum's coral — but that stratum rests on two transects, so it is descriptive rather than a demonstrated depth effect. Image methods read 7 to 10 points lower (CoralNet 18.8%, Coralscapes 16.2%) on a scored subset of only 11 frames, and should not be averaged.

Stressors

Bleaching is 2.02% on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, 89th of the 98 sites carrying a value, and both runs agree, so the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) figure is the same. All 29 frames were reviewed with no acute bleaching field anywhere; one very large table carries sharply bounded partial mortality across 40% of its plate, already colonized by coralline algae and so an older lesion (e.g., Image 4).

No crown-of-thorns, disease, or predation.

Fish and other fauna

Fauna is exceptional: a gray reef shark and a whitetip reef shark, surgeonfish and fusilier schools, a baitfish cloud, and a giant clam (e.g., Image 2, Image 3, Image 5, Image 6, Image 9, Image 11, Image 13, Image 14, Image 16, Image 18, Image 20, Image 21, Image 25, Image 26, Image 27, Image 29, Image 32).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)25.8
CoralNet27.5
In-house DINOv315.2
CoralSCOP edited31.3
Claude18.4

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.