Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos and Chagos Archipelago

A Peros Banhos fringing forereef (31.2% coral against 42.7% algae) that alternates between dense coral thickets and open sand-and-rubble flats, sheltering sweetlips, triggerfish, and anemonefish in their anemones. Several colonies show clear bleaching, including one large table coral almost entirely white. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Three independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Peros Banhos, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
BIPB64 is an emergent fringing forereef on Peros Banhos, surveyed at intermediate wave exposure to a maximum depth of 27 m.
Porites is the leading genus at just under 9% of the benthos, followed by Acropora, Pocillopora, and Montipora, and coral cover declines with depth as algae takes over the deeper transects. Photographs show a structurally complex reef alternating between dense coral thickets and open sand-and-rubble flats, with sheltering sweetlips, triggerfish, and anemones hosting anemonefish (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 3, Image 5, Image 6, Image 9, Image 10, Image 12, Image 13, Image 14, Image 18, Image 19, Image 25).
Published surveys recorded 31% live coral cover against a higher 42.7% algal cover, with 9.5% of coral imagery showing signs of bleaching (e.g., Image 8, Image 15, Image 16, Image 20, Image 21, Image 22, Image 24, Image 26, Image 27).
The bleaching percentage is a computer vision figure — CoralNet annotation of the informal survey images, not a diver's field estimate — and human-vs-model agreement is weaker for bleaching (r = 0.40) than for coral cover (r = 0.72). Image-based methods read this reef 14–17 points lower than the transects (CoralNet 14.6%, Coralscapes 16.8%); the three are not interchangeable and should not be averaged (see the full report).
Several colonies show clear, colony-scale bleaching consistent with the published figure, including one large table coral photographed almost entirely white (e.g., Image 4, Image 17).
No crown-of-thorns starfish (COTS) or other corallivores evident.
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 31.2 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 26.2 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 33.3 |
| Claude | 22.8 |
Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (31%) is indistinguishable from the range of these surveys (20–29%): the 2.4-point gap is inside the ±7 percentage-point noise between methods; the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36005 | 2015 | 20% | 1.50 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36007 | 2015 | 29% | 3.92 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36006 | 2015 | 27% | 4.58 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.