Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos and Chagos Archipelago

A windward fore reef on the south rim of Peros Banhos (33% coral against 41% algae) that alternates between dense coral thickets and open sand-and-rubble flats, sheltering sweetlips, triggerfish, and anemonefish in their anemones. Several colonies show clear bleaching, including one large table coral almost entirely white. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Three independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Peros Banhos, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
BIPB64 is a windward fore reef on the south rim of Peros Banhos, dived to a maximum depth of 29.9 m on 15 April 2015; Anderson's notes describe a fairly steep fore-reef wall with mild current and very high coral cover; the transects, which average every depth, give 33%, with cover falling as algae takes over the deeper strata.
Porites is the leading genus at 10% of the benthos, followed by Acropora, Pocillopora, and Montipora, and coral cover declines with depth as algae takes over the deeper strata. Photographs show a structurally complex reef alternating between dense coral thickets and open sand-and-rubble flats, with sheltering sweetlips, triggerfish, and anemones hosting anemonefish (e.g., Image 1, Image 2, Image 3, Image 5, Image 6, Image 9, Image 10, Image 12, Image 13, Image 14, Image 18, Image 19, Image 25).
Several colonies show clear, colony-scale bleaching consistent with the published figure, including one large table coral photographed almost entirely white (e.g., Image 4, Image 17).
Anderson's sampling sheet records three pocilloporid colonies sampled here for a collaborator (species by field call): Pocillopora sp. ChJo167 (20.9 m, bleached and diseased, healthy part sampled); Pocillopora verrucosa ChJo168 (14.9 m, 40% bleached) and ChJo169 (10.8 m, healthy). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.2% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. Within 5 km, three independent stations recorded station-year means of 20–29% hard coral cover in 2015; the nearest, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36005, 1.50 km away, read 20% in 2015.
Reef type and aspect follow Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'fringing reef', 'windward'); the south rim faces south, into the southeast trades. The LOF habitat map has no reef polygon within 65 m of the pin (nearest 'deep fore reef slope' 125 m); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (fringing reef).
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 33.0 | |
| In-house DINOv3 | 26.2 | n = 21 · SE 3.4 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 33.3 | n = 21 · SE 3.1 |
| Claude | 22.8 | n = 21 · SE 3.6 |
The three computer-vision methods disagree by 10.5 pp (22.8–33.3%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (33.0%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spalding et al. (2025) | — | 2 stations, 4.28 km | Records ↓ |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | 2015 | 3 stations, 1.50–4.58 km | Records ↓ |
Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (33%) sits 13 points above the one survey station up to 2 km away (20%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test. 2 further rows in the table have no survey date, so they are listed but not part of this summary.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names. Values above 70% are marked “best patch”: surveys often target the densest coral on a reef, so these may overstate the site as a whole.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36005 | 2015 | 20% | 1.50 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36007 | 2015 | 29% | 3.92 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36006 | 2015 | 27% | 4.58 km | doi:10.14264/uql.2019.930 |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | Peros Banhos - Vache Marine, lagoon (W, 5-10 m) | pre-bleaching baseline | 80% best patch | 4.28 km | — |
| Spalding et al. (2025) | Peros Banhos - Vache Marine, lagoon (W, 2-3 m) | pre-bleaching baseline | 35% | 4.28 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.