Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos (BIPB68)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-16
Coordinates
-5.2563, 71.7686
Coral cover
59%
± 4.5% SE, n = 14 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
0.9%
Observations
None tagged; see Stressors below
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
43
Site summary

A reef with two faces (59% cover): a gently descending slope of unbroken staghorn thickets stacked with meter-wide table corals, and shallower mounds packed shoulder to shoulder with salmon, chartreuse, lilac, and mustard corals. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
21.5 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.9°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 30.3–31.5°C
+1.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.1°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 30.3–31.5°C.
Bottom time
65 min
in at 13:49

Two other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

25 of the 43 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

135182425272829313435363738394041

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BIPB68 is a leeward back-reef coral framework on the lagoon side of the Peros Banhos north rim (LOF habitat map), dived to 21.5 m on 16 April 2015, at a station CTD-cast midpoint of 30.9°C and 34.5 salinity; Anderson's notes call it a stunning site, among the best of the BIOT dives, with live coral covering 100% of the reef from 2 to 12 m in the field notes (the page's cover headline comes from the expedition transects).

General benthic features

The reef has two faces. The first is a continuous, gently descending slope of branching and tabulate Acropora: Image 8 through Image 16 and Image 19 through Image 23 look along an unbroken thicket of thin-branched staghorn and corymbose colonies running out of sight into blue, with flat tabulate plates a meter and more across stacked in overlapping tiers through it (Image 17 is the clearest — three large tables shingled one above the next).

Between the tables the framework is not bare but crusted pink and mauve in coralline algae. The second face is a mounded, far more mixed assemblage on shallower, better-lit ground: Image 4, Image 26, Image 30, Image 32, and Image 43 show salmon and pink corymbose Acropora, chartreuse-green and mustard corymbose and digitate colonies, lilac and blue-tipped branching colonies, tan and yellow tabulate plates, cream and ochre massive domes with the fine, even porosity of Porites, brown honeycombed and meandering-valley massives, ruffled foliose and bowl-forming plates, and orange-tan encrusting sheets, all packed shoulder to shoulder with almost no open substrate between them.

Image 2 is given over to one large ruffled foliose colony, its concentric fronds edged in pink coralline crust; Image 7 shows tan plating and vase-shaped colonies with an orange encrusting growth beside them; Image 33 and Image 42 are anchored by big pale cream boulder-massives.

Twenty-seven coral genera were recorded, yet Acropora still carries roughly half of all coral present. Composition swings hard with depth: the shallowest stratum is close to a two-genus reef of Acropora and Porites at 58% cover, while the deepest drops to 35% cover with algae peaking at 47% and hands the reef over to Echinopora and Goniastrea.

Coral cover

Stressors

The wide slope frames show scattered pale to bone-white patches within the branching stands (e.g., Image 11, Image 13, Image 16), which may be exposed skeleton and rubble or bleached tissue; no crown-of-thorns or obvious disease lesion was seen. The published image-based bleaching figure is 0.87%, but Anderson's sampling sheet records three of the 11 colonies sampled here as 80% or more bleached, and three others as healthy but with pale branch tips or sections (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.2% cyanobacteria and 0.3% recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

Fish are sparse and incidental: small planktivores over the slope, a single blue-and-yellow fish beside the mushroom coral in Image 6.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's dive on 16 April 2015 entered the water at 13:49 and lasted 65 minutes, to a maximum depth of 21.5 m (the field sheet), in calm water. Anderson sampled 10 colonies identified in the field as Pocillopora acuta, found at all depths (CHPd81–CHPd90, collected 13:55–14:50 at 6.5–19.9 m): CHPd81–CHPd87 healthy (three with pale branch tips or sections), CHPd88 80% bleached and likely unhealthy, CHPd89 95% bleached with live tissue and polyps still extended, and CHPd90 (collected by Sam) apparently healthy. Anderson also sampled the only Seriatopora hystrix colony seen at the site, ChSe71 (14:04, 19.8 m; more than 90% bleached, likely unhealthy, in an area of very high coral cover). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Image 6 itself is a near-macro portrait of one large solitary free-living fungiid, radial septa in fine detail. Reef type and aspect follow the LOF habitat map: the pin lies 35 m from 'back reef coral framework' on the lagoon side of the north rim, sheltered from the open ocean. Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) records 'fringing reef', 'leeward'; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (fringing reef).

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)59.0
In-house DINOv338.5n = 43 · SE 2.0
CoralSCOP edited39.2n = 43 · SE 2.5
Claude36.8n = 43 · SE 2.6

The three computer-vision methods agree within 2.4 pp (36.8–39.2%) and read 19.8–22.2 pp below the in-water transect (59.0%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.