Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle and Chagos Archipelago

BICC50 is a low-cover Central Chagos lagoon reef (12.1%) where cover was actually higher at depth than in the shallows. Two shark passes were logged and no disease or crown-of-thorns seen; a published bleaching figure for this site is considered unreliable, apparently inflated by a photograph of pale-mantled gastropods being misread as bleached coral. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Central Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
4 of these 11 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BICC50 is a submerged bank reef inside the Central Chagos lagoon at 20.0 m under intermediate exposure, surveyed 25 March 2015 (the photo archive files it as BITB50).
The algal budget is 33.2% sediment-laden turf and 14.6% erect algae, while coralline algae is all but absent at 2.9%, second-lowest of 109. Only 14 genera were recorded, and Acropora, Montipora, and Porites hold 82% of the coral between them — though even the leading genus covers under 5% of the benthos, so this ranks which taxa are least scarce.
It is one of the lowest-cover sites in the archipelago: 12.1% coral against 57.9% algae, 102nd of 109 Chagos sites for cover and 10th for algae, with a further 24.3% bare substrate. The depth structure is inverted: the deeper stratum carries 18.78% coral against 5.33% shallower, the same genus order at both. Unusually, the image methods agree here — CoralNet 13.9%, Coralscapes 12.8% against 12.1% — a property of the low-cover regime, not interchangeability.
Published bleaching is 24.2%, 3rd of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column (the first CoralNet training run, not the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column), but that figure is unsafe here: 25 of 26 bleached point labels fall in four macro frames of a pair of mantle-extended gastropods whose white mantles were read as coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4), the Coralscapes masks report essentially zero bleached area, and the wide frames show a flat, turf-veneered plain with no bleaching field (e.g., Image 1).
Two shark passes were logged, no disease or crown-of-thorns (e.g., Image 2).
No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 12.1 |
| CoralNet | 29.4 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 30.0 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 28.8 |
| Claude | 15.7 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.