Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BICC50)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Coral Reef Diagnostics
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-25
Coordinates
-6.3994, 71.6173
Coral cover
12%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
24.2%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
11
Site summary

BICC50 is a low-cover Central Chagos lagoon reef (12.1%) where cover was actually higher at depth than in the shallows. Two shark passes were logged and no disease or crown-of-thorns seen; a published bleaching figure for this site is considered unreliable, apparently inflated by a photograph of pale-mantled gastropods being misread as bleached coral. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
20.1 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.0°C
+1.2°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.8°C)
Bottom time
48 min
in at 09:00

4 of these 11 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567891011

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BICC50 is a submerged bank reef inside the Central Chagos lagoon at 20.0 m under intermediate exposure, surveyed 25 March 2015 (the photo archive files it as BITB50).

General benthic features

The algal budget is 33.2% sediment-laden turf and 14.6% erect algae, while coralline algae is all but absent at 2.9%, second-lowest of 109. Only 14 genera were recorded, and Acropora, Montipora, and Porites hold 82% of the coral between them — though even the leading genus covers under 5% of the benthos, so this ranks which taxa are least scarce.

Coral cover

It is one of the lowest-cover sites in the archipelago: 12.1% coral against 57.9% algae, 102nd of 109 Chagos sites for cover and 10th for algae, with a further 24.3% bare substrate. The depth structure is inverted: the deeper stratum carries 18.78% coral against 5.33% shallower, the same genus order at both. Unusually, the image methods agree here — CoralNet 13.9%, Coralscapes 12.8% against 12.1% — a property of the low-cover regime, not interchangeability.

Stressors

Published bleaching is 24.2%, 3rd of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column (the first CoralNet training run, not the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column), but that figure is unsafe here: 25 of 26 bleached point labels fall in four macro frames of a pair of mantle-extended gastropods whose white mantles were read as coral (e.g., Image 3, Image 4), the Coralscapes masks report essentially zero bleached area, and the wide frames show a flat, turf-veneered plain with no bleaching field (e.g., Image 1).

Fish and other fauna

Two shark passes were logged, no disease or crown-of-thorns (e.g., Image 2).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)12.1
CoralNet29.4
In-house DINOv330.0
CoralSCOP edited28.8
Claude15.7

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.