Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BICC36)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-20
Coordinates
-6.2321, 71.5883
Coral cover
5.8%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
6.4%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
15
Site summary

BICC36 is one of the lowest-cover reefs in the Chagos Archipelago (5.8%), its hard pavement crusted mainly in coralline algae rather than fleshy turf, with only 11 coral genera recorded. A spiny lobster, a large octopus, and a mantle-extended cowrie were the highlights of an otherwise sparse reef. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.5 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.5°C
+0.6°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
Bottom time
43 min
in at 10:32

4 of these 15 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

56789101112131415

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BICC36 is a deep submerged bank reef in Central Chagos, forereef aspect under intermediate exposure at 34.4 m, surveyed 20 March 2015.

General benthic features

Coralline algae alone takes 25.9% of the benthos, 8th-highest of 109, while fleshy turf is just 4.85%, and non-coral invertebrates hold a further 25.8%. Only 11 genera were recorded, 104th of 109, with Acropora, Porites, Pocillopora, and Montipora holding 86% of the little coral present.

Coral cover

It is one of the lowest-cover sites in the archipelago: 5.8% coral against 60.4% algae, 106th of 109 Chagos sites for cover and 6th for algae — but that algae is hard pavement, not weed (e.g., Image 2, Image 4).

The two depth strata run in opposite directions: the shallower carries 9.8% coral in a four-genus assemblage over turf-and-sediment ground, while the deeper collapses to 1.8% as coralline algae quadruples to 41.6% and Pocillopora replaces Acropora as leading genus — though that stratum rests on only two transects. Unusually, the image methods read higher than the transects here — CoralNet 13.1%, Coralscapes 7.7% against 5.8% — the known over-read on low-cover reefs.

Stressors

Published bleaching is 6.4%, mid-pack at 58th of 98 on the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column, and the 15-frame review found no unambiguous pallor, no disease, no crown-of-thorns.

Fish and other fauna

The macrofauna is the set's strength: a spiny lobster, a large octopus, a mantle-extended cowrie, and a glassfish shoal over black coral (e.g., Image 1, Image 3).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)5.8
CoralNet19.4
In-house DINOv318.2
CoralSCOP edited24.7
Claude6.4

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.