Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle and Chagos Archipelago

The only lagoon-side Three Brothers site in its group, a sheltered bank reef at 29 m built mainly on Porites and Acropora over fairly open ground. A couple of colonies show textbook partial bleaching, but dense young Acropora recruits on old dead pavement show the reef actively recolonizing. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Three Brothers, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
22 of these 36 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BITB44 is the only one of the Three Brothers sites in this group that sits inside the lagoon — a protected leeward submerged bank reef at 29 m, surveyed 23 March 2015 — and it carries the group's highest cover (e.g., Image 4, Image 5, Image 8, Image 13, Image 16).
Across 25 genera the reef is a two-genus system with a long thin tail: Porites at 18.93% of the benthos, 47% of all coral, and Acropora at 9.36%, the two holding 70% between them (e.g., Image 7, Image 11, Image 28, Image 36, Image 37).
The strata differ far more in composition than in cover, 39.0% shallow against 42.0% deep, but the deeper one becomes close to a monoculture — Porites rising to 58% of its coral while Acropora nearly halves, genus count falling from 25 to just 9, algal cover halving, and bare substrate tripling to 27.0%.
Formal transects recorded 40.5% coral against 27.9% algae, 49th of 109 Chagos sites for cover and 92nd for algae, with an unusually open 17.7% bare substrate (e.g., Image 9, Image 10, Image 19, Image 38).
That contrast rests on only two transects, one of which recorded 20% dead coral, the highest reading at either depth here. Image methods read about 12 points lower (CoralNet 28.6%, Coralscapes 28.1%) and should not be averaged. Coral cover: 41%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 27.9% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 40.5% · CoralNet points 28.6% · Coralscapes masks 28.1% (36 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.
Bleaching on the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column is 5.98%, 69th of 110 dives, mid-range and identical to the first run. Twenty-five of 36 frames were reviewed and agree in kind: two colonies show textbook partial bleaching, a pocilloporid with half its branch mass bone-white against intact brown tissue and a corymbose Acropora with discrete white branch clusters, but no site-wide field (e.g., Image 3, Image 40).
Broad areas of dead coralline-encrusted pavement carry dense juvenile Acropora recruits, so the reef is visibly recolonizing lost framework (e.g., Image 21, Image 26, Image 27, Image 30).
No crown-of-thorns, disease, or predation; a lobster aggregation was photographed (e.g., Image 15, Image 29).
No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 40.5 |
| CoralNet | 33.2 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 29.4 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 38.7 |
| Claude | 26.9 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.