Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB44)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-23
Coordinates
-6.0398, 71.5508
Coral cover
41%
Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
6.0%
Observations
Heat stress
Today’s heat load
16 Sep 2026 · No heat stress
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
NOAA Coral Reef Watch — Chagos virtual station
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
36
Site summary

The only lagoon-side Three Brothers site in its group, a sheltered bank reef at 29 m built mainly on Porites and Acropora over fairly open ground. A couple of colonies show textbook partial bleaching, but dense young Acropora recruits on old dead pavement show the reef actively recolonizing. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
18.5 m
dive-log maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.7°C
+0.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
Bottom time
60 min
in at 09:22

Three other CRD dive sites within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

22 of these 36 photographs are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

12121417182022232531323335

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BITB44 is the only one of the Three Brothers sites in this group that sits inside the lagoon — a protected leeward submerged bank reef at 29 m, surveyed 23 March 2015 — and it carries the group's highest cover (e.g., Image 4, Image 5, Image 8, Image 13, Image 16).

General benthic features

Across 25 genera the reef is a two-genus system with a long thin tail: Porites at 18.93% of the benthos, 47% of all coral, and Acropora at 9.36%, the two holding 70% between them (e.g., Image 7, Image 11, Image 28, Image 36, Image 37).

The strata differ far more in composition than in cover, 39.0% shallow against 42.0% deep, but the deeper one becomes close to a monoculture — Porites rising to 58% of its coral while Acropora nearly halves, genus count falling from 25 to just 9, algal cover halving, and bare substrate tripling to 27.0%.

Coral cover

Formal transects recorded 40.5% coral against 27.9% algae, 49th of 109 Chagos sites for cover and 92nd for algae, with an unusually open 17.7% bare substrate (e.g., Image 9, Image 10, Image 19, Image 38).

That contrast rests on only two transects, one of which recorded 20% dead coral, the highest reading at either depth here. Image methods read about 12 points lower (CoralNet 28.6%, Coralscapes 28.1%) and should not be averaged. Coral cover: 41%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 27.9% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 40.5% · CoralNet points 28.6% · Coralscapes masks 28.1% (36 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.

Stressors

Bleaching on the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column is 5.98%, 69th of 110 dives, mid-range and identical to the first run. Twenty-five of 36 frames were reviewed and agree in kind: two colonies show textbook partial bleaching, a pocilloporid with half its branch mass bone-white against intact brown tissue and a corymbose Acropora with discrete white branch clusters, but no site-wide field (e.g., Image 3, Image 40).

Broad areas of dead coralline-encrusted pavement carry dense juvenile Acropora recruits, so the reef is visibly recolonizing lost framework (e.g., Image 21, Image 26, Image 27, Image 30).

No crown-of-thorns, disease, or predation; a lobster aggregation was photographed (e.g., Image 15, Image 29).

Comparisons with other data

No prior survey data from this site. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. The 2,500 frames were not associated with any transect taken within 200 m of them, so transect-vs-image comparisons are site means, never frames. The transect value is already in the pin `cover` field (109 of 112 pins, sourced to the paper's suppl. S1) and is read from there, never re-imported. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure (Anderson, 2026-09-22).
MethodHard-coral cover (%)
Transect (published)40.5
CoralNet33.2
In-house DINOv329.4
CoralSCOP edited38.7
Claude26.9

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.