Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Speakers Bank (BISP100)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-04-28
Coordinates
-4.7843, 72.3445
Coral cover
41%
± 4.7% SE, n = 13 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
4.8%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
7
Site summary

A high-cover but patchy bank reef at the north tip of Speakers Bank (41% coral), dominated by Acropora tables. Cover rises with depth, from 37% in the main depth stratum to 72% on a single deep transect where Acropora is almost the only coral, and Anderson found most pocilloporids bleached, diseased, or partly dead. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
15.7 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
30.0°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.8–30.1°C
+0.8°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (29.2°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.8–30.1°C.
Bottom time
48 min
in at 08:15

One other CRD dive site with its own page within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

4 of the 7 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

567

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

BISP100 is a high-cover but visibly patchy bank reef at the north tip of Speakers Bank, surveyed 28 April 2015 on a dive to 15.7 m (see Dive record below), with 41% transect coral cover against only 34% algae.

General benthic features

Bare substrate is the notable substrate figure at 21%, with turf 12%, coralline algae 7.0%, macroalgae 4.3%, non-coral invertebrates 4.2%, and erect algae 0.4%. The assemblage is strongly Acropora-led across 16 non-zero genera. Acropora holds 23% of the benthos — 56% of all coral recorded — then Porites and Montipora 4.1% each, Astreopora 2.4%, Leptastrea 1.7%, Pocillopora 1.5%, Psammocora 0.9%, and Goniastrea 0.7%. Pavona and Montastrea hold 0.6% each, and six further genera sit below 0.5%: Favia, Favites, Hydnophora, Platygyra, Acanthastrea, and Cyphastrea. The site mean of 23% Acropora therefore averages a moderately diverse main stratum with two single deeper transects that are nearly all Acropora. The reef architecture alternates between locally dense coral patches and open framework. One frame shows several overlapping tables and branched colonies set at different heights, producing shaded cavities and small fish refuges (e.g., Image 4); two others show the same arrangement at wider scale, with live plates spaced by pale pavement and older irregular substrate (e.g., Image 3).

Formal surveys give 41% coral, 34% algae, and 4.2% non-coral invertebrates, the coral 56% Acropora and reaching 64% of the benthos on the single deepest transect. The photographs document a patchy canopy of overlapping tables and branching colonies separated by pale pavement, one partly bleached colony, and a large holothurian.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 4.8% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1), and Anderson's notes record most pocilloporids at the site bleached, diseased, or partly dead (see Dive record below). In the photographs, a compact branching colony is mostly brown with many white branch ends and several larger white patches (e.g., Image 2).

Much of the pale ground in the open frames is old eroded framework or sediment rather than bleached tissue. The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.2% cyanobacteria and 0.4% recently dead coral.

Fish and other fauna

The same frame holds a large dark reticulated sea cucumber beneath the colony (e.g., Image 2). Small black-and-white fishes shelter among the branches.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Dive record

Anderson's morning dive on 28 April 2015 entered the water at 08:15 and lasted 48 minutes, to a maximum depth of 15.7 m (the field sheet); the notes record a mild current that picked up through the dive, only one depth within swimmable distance, no Seriatopora hystrix or P. acuta, and most pocilloporids bleached, diseased, or partly dead. For a collaborator Anderson sampled six pocilloporids (species by field call): Pocillopora sp. ChJo256 (collected 08:23 at 15.2 m; healthy, dark pigmentation and green fluorescence, common at the site), ChJo258 (08:39, 15.3 m; many pigment anomalies, 10% bleached or dead), ChJo260 (08:50, 14.9 m; large, 10% diseased), and ChJo261 (08:56, 14.6 m; 10% bleached, diseased, or dead; the healthy part was sampled), and Pocillopora verrucosa ChJo257 (08:30, 15.3 m; 15% bleached or diseased) and ChJo259 (08:44, 15.4 m; mostly diseased). Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook) leaves the reef type and aspect blank, so no aspect is printed; the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (bank reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers Speakers Bank; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin on the northern tip of the Speakers Bank rim (open bank water; aspect not testable at this scale).

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)40.6
CoralNettoo few photos (n=7)
In-house DINOv3too few photos (n=7)
CoralSCOP editedtoo few photos (n=7)
Claudetoo few photos (n=7)

CoralNet: this method was run on 7 of 7 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

In-house DINOv3: this method was run on 7 of 7 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

CoralSCOP edited: this method was run on 7 of 7 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Claude: this method was run on 7 of 7 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.