Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BIEA25)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-17
Coordinates
-6.1907, 71.3184
Coral cover
18%
± 2.1% SE, n = 19 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
18%
Observations
bleachingrecent mortality
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
20
Site summary

BIEA25 has 18% coral cover on the survey transects. Its photographs move from a low-relief plain of pale rubble and sparse Porites-type heads to dense corymbose Acropora-type thickets over white sand, and a large octopus occupies three consecutive frames. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.4°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.3–29.6°C
+0.5°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.3–29.6°C.
Bottom time
61 min
in at 08:26

One independent survey station shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.

Six other CRD dive sites with their own pages within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.

14 of the 20 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.

178202124

Photo credit & attribution

Site description

Setting

Fringing reef, leeward from its position on the north side of the Eagle Islands reef platform relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds (windward on Anderson's field sheet); the photographs show two habitats.

General benthic features

Porites was the most common coral genus on this station's transects (10% of the benthos), followed by Pocillopora (3.5%), Montipora (1.9%), Pavona (0.8%), and Acropora and Astreopora (0.5% each); bare substrate covered 17%, behind crustose coralline algae (26%), the largest single living non-coral group (LOF transects; all algae together 61%). Among the algal classes, crustose coralline algae led (26% of the benthos), followed by turf (20%) and sediment-laden turf (7.7%). The first frames are over a low-relief plain of pale consolidated carbonate, rubble, and coarse sand carrying small, well-spaced colonies — olive knobby and domal Porites-type heads, scattered small branching colonies, old tabular plates already given over to turf and coralline algae (four frames all show the same ground) (e.g., Image 2, Image 3, Image 9).

Later frames reach broad corymbose Acropora-type thickets standing clear of white sand — a run of six consecutive frames — and frame-level live cover jumps from single figures to 60% (e.g., Image 16, Image 18, Image 19).

Coral cover

Stressors

Two frames matter for condition. One is a macro of a cream-white knobby branching colony (e.g., Image 15): it is one of the four Pocillopora colonies sampled on this dive for a collaborator (ChJo73 on Anderson's sampling sheet, collected at 08:54), pale (about 10% of the colony) but likely healthy, per the sheet.

The other is a downward macro of pavement carrying a dense field of small dark boreholes or oscula — bioerosion or a boring sponge, not resolvable — ringed by pale coral recruits with blue-white polyp tips, which are healthy and should not be read as bleaching (e.g., Image 17).

No crown-of-thorns starfish was seen in review. Published bleaching is 18% (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1); of the four colonies Anderson sampled here, one was 10% bleached or pale and one had 10% recent mortality (see Dive record below). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 1.1% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral on the transect lines.

Fish and other fauna

The macrofauna is dominated by one animal. A large octopus occupies three consecutive frames wedged against a maroon- and pink-encrusted ledge, mantle, papillae, and red-rimmed eye filling the frame; the last is the clearest (e.g., Image 13, Image 14, Image 23).

The thickets swarm with blue-green chromis, a blue-and-yellow damselfish in the branches of one frame, and a humbug-type damselfish in another (e.g., Image 10).

One frame is the site's best fish frame: three lined surgeonfish and two powder-blue surgeonfish over a broad mauve-pink corymbose table (e.g., Image 4).

The deepest and most algal frame — an eroded ridge falling into blue under pink CCA, maroon crusts, and yellow-green turf — carries a stream of fusiliers (Caesionidae) and a dark blotched mass that is probably an encrusting sponge but is not resolvable (e.g., Image 5).

Conspicuous fauna and sessile invertebrates appear as sponges in 7 frames, sea cucumbers in 3 frames, and anemones in 3 frames.

Comparisons with other data

Perry et al. (2015) surveyed a nearby station (Eagle Island middle site, Great Chagos Bank) in April 2015, 0.30 km from the pin; we could not confirm that it is the same reef. Cover values from that work are not among the survey records shown on this page. Within 5 km, one independent station, XL Catlin Seaview Survey at transect 36003, 2.35 km away, read 13% in 2015.

Dive record

Anderson sampled four pocilloporid colonies on this dive for a collaborator (the sampling sheet; Pocillopora sp.): ChJo71 (collected 08:41 at 29.9 m; small and healthy, too young to identify), ChJo72 (08:48, 20.3 m; 10% recent mortality, identity unsure; the healthy part was sampled), ChJo73 (08:54, 15.4 m; 10% bleached or pale, though likely healthy; the pale part was sampled), and ChJo74 (09:06, 10.9 m; large and healthy, either P. meandrina or P. eydouxi, very common at the site). The notes record calm, clear water, low coral cover at 10 m, and no Pocillopora damicornis, P. acuta, or Seriatopora. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305).

Other notes

The opening sequence is a methodology record, not a benthic one. One frame shows a diver kneeling on the pavement working a black-and-white banded transect pole, camera housing and strobe beside them; another a second diver with slate and housing; a third two divers with the pole strung between them. One frame is the fullest apparatus frame at the site — five divers in open water, the banded pole, a camera tray, and at upper right a diver carrying a distinct white rectangular open frame that reads as a photoquadrat; another has a diver in the background blue holding the same frame. Anderson's field sheet records the aspect (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'fringing reef', 'windward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'intermediate' (fringing reef). The aspect shown, 'leeward', comes from the station's GPS position on the north side of the Eagle Islands reef platform relative to the prevailing southeast trade winds (about 153° off the upwind direction; the reef-edge reading agrees), which takes precedence over slope facing, lagoon shelter, imagery, and field labels. Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) puts the pin on the northwest side of Eagle Island, facing northwest (about 300°): windward for the northwest monsoon winds of the March survey and leeward for the southeast trades of April to November.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)18.2
CoralNet29.5*n = 19 · SE 5.4
In-house DINOv325.6*n = 19 · SE 5.2
CoralSCOP edited29.8*n = 19 · SE 4.4
Claude16.4*n = 19 · SE 4.1

The four computer-vision methods disagree by 13.4 pp (16.4–29.8%) and read on both sides of the in-water transect (18.2%); the headline is the in-water transect because a diver transect is independent of the photographs.

*Based on only 19 reef-habitat photos; this estimate is less certain.

Independent surveys nearby

Within 5 km, 1 independent survey station recorded hard coral cover in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (18%) is not compared with these surveys: none lies within 2 km.

Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.

Independent survey data near this site
AgencySite / locationDateHard coral cover (%)DistanceLink
XL Catlin Seaview Surveytransect 36003201513%2.35 kmdoi:10.14264/uql.2019.930

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition, Coral Reef Diagnostics, and the organizations named in the data sources above.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.

References

  1. Mayfield AB, Dempsey AC (2026). Using tourist diver images to estimate coral cover and bleaching prevalence in a remote Indian Ocean coral reef system. Oceans 7(1):1. PDF
  2. Perry CT, Murphy GN, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Januchowski-Hartley FA, East HK (2015). Remote coral reefs can sustain high growth potential and may match future sea-level trends. Scientific Reports 5:18289. DOI
  3. Gonzalez-Rivero M, et al. (2019). Seaview Survey photo-quadrat and image classification dataset. The University of Queensland (UQ eSpace) data collection. DOI