Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Peros Banhos and Chagos Archipelago

An exposed forereef outside Peros Banhos at 31 m built on massive Porites mounds (half the coral) rather than the usual Acropora tables, at 44% cover. Bleaching was among the worst tenth in Chagos (17.4%), with fully white plate colonies and a brain coral gone pale mauve, and the deep sand slope holds gorgonians, black corals, and sponges. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
Two independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
One other CRD dive site within 5 km shown in orange — click a marker to open its page.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Peros Banhos, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
1 of these 9 photographs is shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
BIPB75 is an exposed, windward emergent fringing forereef outside Peros Banhos, surveyed 19 April 2015 at 31.0 m.
The assemblage is the departure: across 20 genera, Porites holds 51% of all coral while Acropora, normally the leading genus on an exposed Chagos forereef, manages only 3.0% of the benthos, so the reef's structure is carried by massive mounds rather than tables. Cover almost halves down the profile, from 63.25% at the shallowest transect — where Porites alone is 64% of the coral — to 35.5% and then 33.0%, with Montipora rising to a quarter of the coral at the deepest station.
Formal transects recorded 43.9% coral against a comparatively low 32.8% algae — 38th of 109 Chagos sites for cover, 81st for algae — with coralline algae unusually scarce at 6.8% and non-coral invertebrates taking 17.4% of the benthos. Image methods read lower than the transects — CoralNet 29.6%, Coralscapes 31.4% against 43.9%. Coral cover: 44%. Live hard coral measured on the in situ benthic transects of the LOF BIOT-1 expedition (Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, Oceans, supplemental S1), against algal cover of 32.8% of the benthos. The transect figure is this site's authoritative cover value; no image-derived product overrides it. Across methods the same reef reads: transects 43.9% · CoralNet points 29.6% · Coralscapes masks 31.4% (9 frames). These products have different sampling footprints and denominators and should not be averaged.
Published bleaching is 17.4%, and the top-decile rank of 10th of 98 comes off the site table's Mean(%bleaching) column, the first CoralNet training run rather than the canonical % bleaching (2nd training) column. The photographs back it at colony scale: two fully white plating colonies beside pigmented neighbors, lavender-white branch-tip paling in another frame, a whole brain colony gone pale mauve, plus a deep sand-slope frame of gorgonians, black corals, and sponges that explains the invertebrate reading (e.g., Image 1).
No disease or crown-of-thorns was seen.
No independent survey was made at this exact site; the nearest ones are listed in the table below.
| Method | Hard-coral cover (%) |
|---|---|
| Transect (published) | 43.9 |
| CoralNet | 39.2 |
| In-house DINOv3 | 42.2 |
| CoralSCOP edited | 43.7 |
| Claude | 32.4 |
Within 5 km, 2 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (44%) sits 17.5 points above the range of these surveys (21–26%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods (the XL Catlin Seaview Survey uses photo-transects with automated image annotation), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once the range is shown. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36012 | 2015 | 26% | 1.88 km | — |
| XL Catlin Seaview Survey | transect 36011 | 2015 | 21% | 3.81 km | — |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data-sources table above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.