Coral Reef Diagnostics

Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West (BITB47)

Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation — Global Reef Expedition
⬇ Download this page as a report card
05
Photo: Anderson Mayfield/Coral Reef Diagnostics
Survey date(s)
2015-03-24
Coordinates
-6.0266, 71.6164
Coral cover
53%
± 3.1% SE, n = 17 transects · Benthic surveys
Coral bleached
5.6%
Observations
Heat stress
Most recent heat load record
26 Oct 2026 · Bleaching Warning
5-year thermal stress load
5-year mean max. degree heating weeks (DHW)
2021–2025
i 5-year mean max. DHW is the mean of the annual maximum DHWs over the five complete years named above, not conditions today.
More infoChagos Archipelago, UK (NOAA CRW virtual station)
Photographs
2
Site summary

A coral-abundant, genus-rich lagoonal patch reef, leeward on Anderson's field sheet (dived to 30.6 m), with 53% coral cover and 29 genera, including blue coral at mid-depth; cover climbs and algae fall as the reef deepens. A fogged camera left only two photos, so condition could barely be assessed from images, though the sampling sheet records the colonies sampled as healthy to 30% bleached or sickly. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.

Max. depth dived
30.6 m
sample-sheet maximum
Water temp. during survey
29.8°Cii
CTD-cast midpoint of 29.7–29.9°C
+0.9°C vs the 2015 mean sea temperature (28.9°C)
ii Station CTD-cast midpoint, not a dive reading: midpoint of the station's maximum and minimum CTD water temperature (Living Oceans Foundation Chagos station records); range 29.7–29.9°C.
Bottom time
57 min
in at 09:18

Site description

Setting

BITB47 is a lagoonal patch reef inside the Three Brothers lagoon, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 24 March 2015 on a dive to 30.6 m: 53% coral against 37% algae, with 29 genera.

General benthic features

Only 5.8% of the benthos is bare substrate and 4.0% non-coral invertebrates. Acropora leads at 16% of the benthos and Porites at 11%, together 51% of all coral. The depth profile is the finding: cover climbs monotonically 48%, 55%, 58% while algae falls 44% to 24%, the middle stratum is the diversity peak carrying every one of the site's 29 genera, and leadership hands over at the bottom, where Porites jumps to 25% of the benthos, 43% of that stratum's coral and four times its mid-depth value, pushing Acropora into second. The blue coral Heliopora occurs at the middle stratum and nowhere else.

Coral cover

Stressors

Published bleaching is 5.56% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). Condition, though, cannot really be assessed from images: the camera housing fogged, so the photographic record is two frames (Anderson's sampling sheet: no good pictures of the colonies because of camera fogging). They show a dense mixed high-cover mosaic and one large gold table colony carrying an older partial-mortality lesion already colonized by coralline algae; no bleaching field, crown-of-thorns, or disease is visible, but from two frames that is weak evidence (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).

Anderson's sampling sheet records eight colonies sampled here at 11.6–30.5 m: one Pocillopora acuta by RFLP; three Seriatopora hystrix and one P. acuta by field call; three Pocillopora sp. sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 30% bleached. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.2% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.

Comparisons with other data

Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.

Other notes

Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'lagoonal patch reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (patch reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows open water at the pin about 17 km northeast of North Brother, on the Great Chagos Bank; no bottom or reef edge is visible, so the imagery cannot test the aspect.

CV model comparison

Headline is the transect value; every other row is listed beside it for comparison and none is averaged in. ⚠ The reference here is NOT the same instrument as at Mauritius, Oman, Kenya, or the Red Sea.
More infoThose are point counts on the photographs; this is a diver swimming a transect. The models and the reference never saw the same thing. ⚠ SITE-LEVEL ONLY. None of the Chagos photographs (2,500 frames across all stations) can be matched to a transect taken within 200 m, so transect-vs-image comparisons use site means, never individual frames. The transect value is the mean of all of this station's own transects in the expedition's per-transect benthic data. The transect is THE coral-cover value for this site and stands alone. The rows below it are a methods comparison only: no computer-vision value is averaged with it, feeds the headline, or carries over to the site's cover figure.
MethodHard coral cover (%)Photos (n) ± SE
Transect mean (all transects)53.3
CoralNettoo few photos (n=2)
In-house DINOv3too few photos (n=2)
CoralSCOP editedtoo few photos (n=2)
Claudetoo few photos (n=2)

CoralNet: this method was run on 2 of 2 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

In-house DINOv3: this method was run on 2 of 2 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

CoralSCOP edited: this method was run on 2 of 2 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Claude: this method was run on 2 of 2 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.

Data & links

All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.

© Coral Reef Diagnostics.