Part of the regional summaries: Chagos Archipelago - Great Chagos Bank West / Brothers / Eagle and Chagos Archipelago

A coral-abundant, genus-rich lagoonal patch reef, leeward on Anderson's field sheet (dived to 30.6 m), with 53% coral cover and 29 genera, including blue coral at mid-depth; cover climbs and algae fall as the reef deepens. A fogged camera left only two photos, so condition could barely be assessed from images, though the sampling sheet records the colonies sampled as healthy to 30% bleached or sickly. Surveyed on the Living Oceans Foundation's Global Reef Expedition.
🗺 Detailed map of the Global Reef Expedition dive sites, Three Brothers, Chagos (Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation; opens in a new window)
BITB47 is a lagoonal patch reef inside the Three Brothers lagoon, leeward on Anderson's field sheet, surveyed 24 March 2015 on a dive to 30.6 m: 53% coral against 37% algae, with 29 genera.
Only 5.8% of the benthos is bare substrate and 4.0% non-coral invertebrates. Acropora leads at 16% of the benthos and Porites at 11%, together 51% of all coral. The depth profile is the finding: cover climbs monotonically 48%, 55%, 58% while algae falls 44% to 24%, the middle stratum is the diversity peak carrying every one of the site's 29 genera, and leadership hands over at the bottom, where Porites jumps to 25% of the benthos, 43% of that stratum's coral and four times its mid-depth value, pushing Acropora into second. The blue coral Heliopora occurs at the middle stratum and nowhere else.
Published bleaching is 5.56% (CoralNet analysis of the survey images; Mayfield & Dempsey 2026, suppl. S1). Condition, though, cannot really be assessed from images: the camera housing fogged, so the photographic record is two frames (Anderson's sampling sheet: no good pictures of the colonies because of camera fogging). They show a dense mixed high-cover mosaic and one large gold table colony carrying an older partial-mortality lesion already colonized by coralline algae; no bleaching field, crown-of-thorns, or disease is visible, but from two frames that is weak evidence (e.g., Image 1, Image 2).
Anderson's sampling sheet records eight colonies sampled here at 11.6–30.5 m: one Pocillopora acuta by RFLP; three Seriatopora hystrix and one P. acuta by field call; three Pocillopora sp. sampled for a collaborator (field calls); the condition notes run from healthy to 30% bleached. Pocillopora acuta colonies from this archipelago were analyzed in Thomas et al. (2026, Global Ecology and Biogeography 35:e70305, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70305). The Living Oceans Foundation transects here recorded 0.2% cyanobacteria and no recently dead coral.
Apart from the Living Oceans Foundation survey shown here, we found no other surveys at this site as of 2026. If you would like to share yours, please email us.
Aspect follows Anderson's field sheet (LOF fellowship 2016 workbook: 'lagoonal patch reef', 'leeward'); the expedition's 933-site table classes the station as 'protected' (patch reef). Esri World Imagery (no LOF habitat map covers this station; the LOF Chagos habitat map covers only Peros Banhos) shows open water at the pin about 17 km northeast of North Brother, on the Great Chagos Bank; no bottom or reef edge is visible, so the imagery cannot test the aspect.
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Transect mean (all transects) | 53.3 | |
| CoralNet | too few photos (n=2) | |
| In-house DINOv3 | too few photos (n=2) | |
| CoralSCOP edited | too few photos (n=2) | |
| Claude | too few photos (n=2) |
CoralNet: this method was run on 2 of 2 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
In-house DINOv3: this method was run on 2 of 2 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
CoralSCOP edited: this method was run on 2 of 2 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
Claude: this method was run on 2 of 2 photos, under the 10 needed for a value, so it is not shown and is left out of any mean; every other row rests on its own photo count.
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from the Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation Global Reef Expedition and Coral Reef Diagnostics.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.