Part of the regional summaries: Taiwan (mainland + offshore islands) and Taiwan
Three fieldwork dives here in 2008 — checking an artificial reef and swapping settlement tiles — found the water murky from run-off but surprisingly nice coral. No coral-cover measurement of its own was taken; Reef Check's closest station, 0.35 km away, recorded 10% hard coral in 2009, and a second station of the same name, 0.97 km away, recorded 19% in 2019.
2008年在此進行了三次野外工作潛水——檢查一座人工魚礁並更換附著板——發現海水因地表逕流而混濁,但珊瑚卻出乎意料地漂亮。此地沒有自己的珊瑚覆蓋率測量;最近的 Reef Check 測站位於 0.35 km 外,於2009年記錄到10%的石珊瑚,另一個同名測站位於 0.97 km 外,於2019年記錄到19%。
本摘要由 AI 翻譯;以英文版本為準。
Seven independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
The contemporaneous log notes water very murky from Kaohsiung-area run-off but surprisingly nice coral, and good soft coral with about 30 ft of visibility on the last dive.
The closest Reef Check site is a station named Beauty Cave, 0.35 km from this approximate pin; its only survey date, 1 September 2009, recorded 10% hard coral (mean of 2 surveys, 5 m and 10 m; Reef Check data, a separate station, not a survey of this site). A second Reef Check station, also named Beauty Cave, lies 0.97 km away; its latest survey, on 30 October 2019, recorded 19% hard coral (mean of the 5 m and 10 m surveys), the value shown in the coral-cover tile.
Three dives here on 29 August 2008, to 23.8 m, 10.1 m and 7.9 m. The first checked on the status of an artificial reef and turned up an octopus and a turtle; the third swapped out settlement tiles — so this was fieldwork, not sightseeing.
No underwater photographs from this site are on file.
Within 5 km, 7 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 48 surveys between 2009 and 2019. Of the 4 stations surveyed in more than one year, 3 declined (by 8.0–31 points) and 1 increased (by 9.6 points) between their first and latest surveys. Two stations share the longest span (2010–2019); one, Beauty Cave (Reef Check, 0.97 km away), went from 9.4% in 2010 (mean of 2 surveys) to 19% in 2019 (mean of 2 surveys). The most recent nearby survey is from 2019, so these values predate recent heat stress.
Collected by other programs using different methods (Reef Check uses point-intercept transects), so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reef Check | Beauty Cave | 2009 | 10%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 10 m) | 0.35 km |
| Reef Check | Geban Bay | 2009 | 10%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 14 m) | 2.56 km |
| Reef Check | Houshi Fringing Reef | 2009–2017 | 13–51% (range of yearly means; 8 surveys) | 3.56 km |
| Reef Check | Beauty Cave | 2010–2019 | 9.4–32% (range of yearly means; 14 surveys) | 0.97 km |
| Reef Check | Geban Bay | 2010 | 6.9%, mean of 2 surveys (5 m and 10 m) | 3.11 km |
| Reef Check | Houshi | 2010–2019 | 6.6–38% (range of yearly means; 8 surveys) | 3.97 km |
| Reef Check | Yuchengwei | 2014–2019 | 7.5–19% (range of yearly means; 12 surveys) | 1.17 km |
Data on this page are from Coral Reef Diagnostics (the dive record) and the organizations named in the data sources above; Coral Reef Diagnostics has no coral cover estimate of its own at this site.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.