Part of the regional summaries: Saudi Arabia - Jeddah / KAUST (Thuwal) / Rabigh, Saudi Arabia, and Red Sea

At Shark Reef, two visits at the peak of the 2024 bleaching event found roughly seven in ten corals bleached (73% and 71% of tissue), with whole slope faces of massive Porites, other massives, and Acropora glowing uniform white in frame after frame, plus three crown-of-thorns starfish photographed amid the dying reef. Anderson's field notes from the dives, which record severe bleaching, dead corals, and a dying reef, match what the images show; cover itself held around 16%, since bleached-but-alive coral still counts as cover.
في شعاب القرش، وجدت زيارتان في ذروة حدث الابيضاض في 2024 نحو سبعة من كل عشرة مرجانات مبيضّة (73% و71% من النسيج)، مع واجهات منحدر كاملة من Porites الكتلية ومرجانيات كتلية أخرى وAcropora تتوهج بيضاء موحدة إطارًا بعد إطار، إضافة إلى ثلاثة نجوم بحر من نوع تاج الشوك صُوّرت وسط الشعاب المحتضرة. وتتطابق ملاحظات أندرسون الميدانية من الغطسات، التي تسجّل ابيضاضًا شديدًا ومرجانًا ميتًا وشعابًا محتضرة، مع ما تُظهره الصور؛ وثبتت التغطية نفسها عند نحو 16%، لأن المرجان المبيضّ الحي لا يزال يُحتسب ضمن التغطية.
ترجمة هذا الملخص بالذكاء الاصطناعي؛ النص الإنجليزي هو المعتمد.
Three independent survey stations shown with the program’s logo — click one to see how far it is from this site.
11 of the 24 photographs on this page are shown beside the text that discusses them under "Site description" below.
The reef is a steep buttressed slope of large massive corals — knobby and columnar Porites and other domed and encrusting massives — over consolidated pavement, with pocilloporids and branching Acropora in the shallows and undercuts holding bluestripe snapper and moray eels (e.g., Image 2, Image 5).
The photographs leave no room for interpretation. In wide-angle frame after wide-angle frame the dominant color is white: whole slopes where the majority of visible colonies are stark, uniform, glowing white from top to bottom, running out of the frame in both directions (e.g., Image 3, Image 8, Image 9).
Anderson's field notes for this dive record severe bleaching; bleached pocilloporids, corals, and anemones; bleaching Porites; and dead and dying coral, among it dead Acropora, a mostly dead acroporid, pocilloporids that were nearly dead or dead, and dead coral covered in algae. And there are crown-of-thorns here: three separate Acanthaster individuals photographed amid bleached and dying coral, one on 31 August and two different ones on 14 September, a gray-green one on open rubble (e.g., Image 1) and a reddish-brown one in a crevice among bleached massives.
Pink-lavender colonies in Anderson's frames from both days (e.g., Image 21, Image 18), including one noted as a nearly dead pocilloporid (e.g., Image 22), are fluorescent (colorful) bleaching.
In one 14 September frame a rust-orange cyanobacterial mat is overgrowing dead coral framework (e.g., Image 23).
Two giant clams sit among bleached colonies (e.g., Image 5), and a blue-spotted stingray was photographed on the 14 September dives (e.g., Image 24).
Aeby et al. (2021) surveyed a nearby station (Qita al Kirsh) in 2015, 0.36 km from the pin. Within 5 km, three independent stations recorded station-year means of 23–60% hard coral cover between 2010 and 2015; the nearest, Monroe et al. (2018) at Midshelf reef 2, 0.36 km away, read 37% in 2015.
Two logged dives on 14 September 2024 (the 31 August visit is not in the log) at the peak of the 2024 Red Sea bleaching event, worked with Coastline (KAUST).
Shark Reef: surveyed 2 times, Aug 2024–Sep 2024 (CoralNet point counts; Mayfield 2025, Environments 12:248). Surveyed in partnership with Coastline (KAUST).
| Method | Hard coral cover (%) | Photos (n) ± SE |
|---|---|---|
| Published point count (CoralNet-assisted) | 15.9 | |
| CoralSCOP edited | 21.9 | n = 330 |
| Claude (edited photos) | 13.8 | n = 351 · SE 0.7 |
The two computer-vision methods differ by 8.1 pp (13.8–21.9%) and read within 6.0 pp of the published point count (15.9%); the headline is the published point count because it is the site's published value (CoralNet-assisted: most frames were annotated by CoralNet's AI, trained and checked by the author).
See a more detailed, stand-alone version of this table.
Coral bleached: computer-vision (CoralNet) estimate from the survey images, per dive, as published in Mayfield (2025, Environments 12:248), Supplementary File S1.
| Date | Time in | Max depth (m) | Bottom time (min) | Coral bleached (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | — | — | — | 72.8 |
| 2024-09-14 | 10:12 | 32.4 | 54 | 70.8 |
| 2024-09-14 | 12:29 | 30.3 | 59 | — |
| Agency / program | Year(s) | Stations / distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aeby et al. (2021) | 2015 | 1 station, 0.36 km | Records ↓ |
| Furby et al. (2013) | 2010 | 1 station, 0.36 km | Records ↓ |
| Monroe et al. (2018) | 2015 | 1 station, 0.36 km | Records ↓ |
Coral Reef DiagnosticsYear-average (illustrative only, programs differ)Within 5 km, 3 independent survey stations recorded hard coral cover in 5 records between 2010 and 2015. The most recent nearby survey is from 2015, so these values predate recent heat stress. This site's own estimate (16%) sits 7 points below the range of these station-year means (23–60%); the methods differ, so the comparison is context, not a like-for-like test.
Collected by other programs using different methods, so these are context for the figures above, not a like-for-like comparison. Where a station was surveyed more than once, the cell shows either the range of its values or, as a single value, the mean of surveys made in one year. Station names are not dive-site names.
| Agency | Site / location | Date | Hard coral cover (%) | Distance | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Furby et al. (2013) | Midshelf reef 2 | 2010 | 23% (3 records) | 0.36 km | doi:10.1007/s00338-012-0998-5 |
| Monroe et al. (2018) | Midshelf reef 2 | 2015 | 37% | 0.36 km | doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195814 |
| Aeby et al. (2021) | Qita al Kirsh | 2015 | 60% | 0.36 km | doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246854 |
All images from Coral Reef Diagnostics. Data are from Coral Reef Diagnostics and the organizations named in the data sources above.
© Coral Reef Diagnostics.